This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Colonel Gadaffi to buy Palace?
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Jay_Palace  17 Jul 04 1.28am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Only at Palace could anything like this be reported! Whether there is any truth in this story remains to be seen, but there are direct quotes in the article by Jordan acknowledging this pupropted interest from Gadaffi. This proves that at the very least there is a shred of credibility in this story.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
SelhurstParkFlyer  17 Jul 04 1.30am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Lookin2Curl1 at 17 Jul 2004 1:15am
Very good? Whether or not he is a kunt or not aint really the issue. Is he guna take the club forward or just use us as a tool to improve his image?? I really think that if this is true it can only be a bad thing- look how many people have stated on this thread they r gona stop coming if he takes over, or that they would rather as be poor and relegated! Probably one and the same, he could only improve his image, if you're correct and that's what he wants to do, if he took the club forward. And money is the real thing that'll take the club forward, of which he probably has bucketloads.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| supersyguy Milton Keynes 17 Jul 04 1.33am |
|
|---|---|
|
Malta where exactly would he take us? You think its hard signing players now? Try when we're owned by a world renowned terrorist! we will be boycotted and shunned by all respectable sections of the football world. His 'image' is of no concern to CPFC. Edited by supersyguy (17 Jul 2004 1:33am) Edited by supersyguy (17 Jul 2004 1:50am)
MKEM Number #2 Do u know what Nemesis means? A rightous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. In this case personified by an 'orrible Kant, ME! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| MacMan Southend-on-Sea 17 Jul 04 1.35am |
|
|---|---|
|
what tha fuk is happening to this club. i agree with sumone else taking over as SJ does not have the right amount of dollor. but not a fukkin terroist for fuks sake. fuk of gadaffi, rather see ron nodes, terry vennables or mark goldberg at the club than that w@nker. ad as for his son, well hes just a tw@t.
Say We Are Premier League, add me 2 msn: themac69@hotmail.com |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 17 Jul 04 1.41am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote maltaeagle at 17 Jul 2004 12:56am
also he's not all cnut. He's quite a charitable bloke, setting up and donating to many charities, lives humbly, often shagging and sleeping in his tent, and face it, he's never been associated with genocidal acts. I'm probably in the minority, but I say go for it, I'll forgive for whatever he's done, if he gets us into champions league Sheesh. Hot on the heels of the highly charged debate currently raging on General Talk about moslem extremists, we now have the Daddy of all fundamentalist islamic terrorists linked with buying Palace. I would have to seriously consider my position as a supporter if this should come to pass. The club would be dancing with the devil in no uncertain terms if this were to go ahead but I'm hoping that, as we are in the journalistic silly season, this proves to be the silliest story of them all.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Lookin2Curl1 Clapham 17 Jul 04 1.41am |
|
|---|---|
|
REASONS WHY THIS CAN ONLY BE BAD
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| maltaeagle 17 Jul 04 1.43am |
|
|---|---|
|
If gadaffi was a terrorist then he would be wanted for war crimes. He had association, just as Gerry Adams did. If he was a proven terrorist then with no doubts he can fcuk himself, but this guy is trying to raise his profile legitamately and thats good enough for me. I really don't think the club would be boycotted as I think if there was any chance of that the deal would be sanctioned by the FA. Again the hi-ups at the FA would I guess have a final say. Quote supersyguy at 17 Jul 2004 1:33am
Malta where exactly would he take us? You think its hard signing players now? Try when we're owned by a world renowned terrorist! we will be boycotted and shunned by all respectable sections of the football league. His 'image' is irrelivant. Edited by supersyguy (17 Jul 2004 1:33am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| mikeyeagle Worthing 17 Jul 04 1.44am |
|
|---|---|
|
Has anyone considered whether this takeover would actually be allowed to go through IF any offer was firstly, made and secondly, accepted? I'm dead sure that there would be a hell of a lot of objection...and not just from the Holmesdale stand... Ok, so this guy has some serious amount of wonga, and let face it - Simon Jordan would be unlikely to turn down the ridiculously massive offer that Gaddaffi Duck would probably pay. Would you turn down £150 for a Mars bar you just paid 35p for? (Well, one with no special offers anyway - Wimbledon have moved on so a "buy one, get one free" offer is out of the question As we all know, the media spout more bull**** than the UK's cattle population, so I don't think we currently have any reason to be alarmed. I'd be surprised if this bloke could tell any one of us who scored our play-off final winner, and I think the only reason that this story is doing the rounds is because SJ hinted at moving on back in June. If he takes over, I think that we will see the crowd drop quite a bit - I for one would be at another Stadium from now on...living where I do, probably Southampton! (I know I live nearer to Seaweed country but there are somethings you just don't do). Lets just remain optimistic, hope it's all media cattle faeces, and if ever it happens, I'd suggest that we all avoid leaving our cars where he might want to park his tank... But with all that said, I can't help feeling a little worried about what it might do to the team in the early stages of our Premier League campaign
 Are you the shepherd, or are you the sheep?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
).
| Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 17 Jul 04 1.48am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote maltaeagle at 17 Jul 2004 1:43am
If gadaffi was a terrorist then he would be wanted for war crimes. He had association, just as Gerry Adams did. If he was a proven terrorist then with no doubts he can fcuk himself, but this guy is trying to raise his profile legitamately and thats good enough for me. I really don't think the club would be boycotted as I think if there was any chance of that the deal would be sanctioned by the FA. Again the hi-ups at the FA would I guess have a final say. Quote supersyguy at 17 Jul 2004 1:33am
Malta where exactly would he take us? You think its hard signing players now? Try when we're owned by a world renowned terrorist! we will be boycotted and shunned by all respectable sections of the football league. His 'image' is irrelivant. Edited by supersyguy (17 Jul 2004 1:33am) Try saying all that to the relatives of PanAm flight 103, the residents of Lockerbie and the family of Yvonne Fletcher. The guy is indisputably a proven terrorist and has given aid and other support to other terrorist organisations, not least the IRA, over the years. His 'rehabilitation' is because he knew that he was going to be next after Saddam if he didn't change his ways and, in my book, that makes him smarter than your average terrorist but a terrorist nonetheless.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Lookin2Curl1 Clapham 17 Jul 04 1.49am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote maltaeagle at 17 Jul 2004 1:43am
If gadaffi was a terrorist then he would be wanted for war crimes. He had association, just as Gerry Adams did. If he was a proven terrorist then with no doubts he can fcuk himself, but this guy is trying to raise his profile legitamately and thats good enough for me. I really don't think the club would be boycotted as I think if there was any chance of that the deal would be sanctioned by the FA. Again the hi-ups at the FA would I guess have a final say. Quote supersyguy at 17 Jul 2004 1:33am
Malta where exactly would he take us? You think its hard signing players now? Try when we're owned by a world renowned terrorist! we will be boycotted and shunned by all respectable sections of the football league. His 'image' is irrelivant. Edited by supersyguy (17 Jul 2004 1:33am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| supersyguy Milton Keynes 17 Jul 04 1.54am |
|
|---|---|
|
Cucking and Curl you guys took the words right outta my mouth! This guy isn't known for being a humanist! Malta YOU are BADLY missing the point!
MKEM Number #2 Do u know what Nemesis means? A rightous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. In this case personified by an 'orrible Kant, ME! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| maltaeagle 17 Jul 04 1.59am |
|
|---|---|
|
well if the point is about image, and so it should be then he's no way good for the club, and I go along with everyone else on this thread, I was just looking at the injection of money, and the success it could bring Quote supersyguy at 17 Jul 2004 1:54am
Cucking and Curl you guys took the words right outta my mouth! This guy isn't known for being a humanist! Malta YOU are BADLY missing the point!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.