Forgive me for not finding the exact quotes but in one of the usual BBC comments forum exchanges about Man City expenditure there was the understandable complaint from Villa fans, when it was pointed out that they were the 7th biggest spenders over recent years, that their spending couldn't continue at Villa at the same level because of the Financial Fair Play rules. Or is it Profit and Responsibility now?

Basically the impression I got was they had maxed out on their losses - though to their credit they had spent well with a good manager.

So they will get some extra money from the Champions League, though will need to qualify for the group stages I think, but will be still be restricted in their spending.

Can anyone more knowledgeable confirm? I think Newcastle are in a similar position where despite untold riches backing them are going to have to sell to buy.

I wouldn't think a one off season in the Champions League would swing it for either Olise or Eze to become a squad player at Villa. They obviously have a pretty good side already and 4th place next year is going to be even more competitive.

Villa have Spurs to thank for imploding for this years qualification.

I think Palace will end on a high, 4-1

You were half right!