This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Teddy Eagle 01 Oct 23 9.47am | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 01 Oct 23 10.14am | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
monkey Sittingbourne,but made in Bromley 01 Oct 23 10.18am | |
---|---|
Good old Darren England strikes again, just pure incompetence, what is he doing at the highest level?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 01 Oct 23 11.17am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
If you consider it though Teddy, with Dermot the ref will still be correct. The excuses will be "only had the information available to him". When, realistically, it should be "how the f*** has he not seen that?". I'd put money on it.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Putitout Oxford 01 Oct 23 11.26am | |
---|---|
They brought VAR in to tidy refereeing up ,get more correct decisions. Two opinions better than one, one possibly more considered. That didn’t always work, so they increased the opinions to three, and guess what already within a few early games the decisions become three times more bizarre . Is there a way out of this? Well if there is it doesn’t look like having more opinions is the way . What about better refs in the first instant.?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Phil’s Barber Crowborough 01 Oct 23 12.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by monkey
Good old Darren England strikes again, just pure incompetence, what is he doing at the highest level? VAR Ref axed!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 01 Oct 23 12.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Putitout
They brought VAR in to tidy refereeing up ,get more correct decisions. Two opinions better than one, one possibly more considered. That didn’t always work, so they increased the opinions to three, and guess what already within a few early games the decisions become three times more bizarre . Is there a way out of this? Well if there is it doesn’t look like having more opinions is the way . What about better refs in the first instant.? Show games live and open up the phone lines so the public can vote on all decisions. Matches will go on for 10+ hours each but that will increase the advertising revenue during breaks and give the players plenty of time to rest, recover, refuel, review their investments, restyle their hair, redefine their gender or what whatever else they do.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
monkey Sittingbourne,but made in Bromley 01 Oct 23 1.41pm | |
---|---|
I couldn’t believe it at the time, they didn’t really query it live, when it was clearly onside, you could tell by the cut of the grass. Gary Neville was rambling on about his leg was only dangling or something somehow defending the decision. I bet he’ll say different now Also on the subject of Neville, a decision that was right, Neville and Redknapp saying Jones didn’t deserve a red, well what ever era you’ve watched or played the game in, even in this day and age, if you go over the top of the ball with a challenge it’s a sending off, those numptys wind me up more than the poor decisions
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 01 Oct 23 5.14pm | |
---|---|
My son sent me this but I cannot open it but the headline says it all. I suspect/hope he is now sacked. Next stop Saudi who want to recruit our refs
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
monkey Sittingbourne,but made in Bromley 01 Oct 23 5.20pm | |
---|---|
Should’ve happened after the Villa game
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 02 Oct 23 7.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
My son sent me this but I cannot open it but the headline says it all. I suspect/hope he is now sacked. Next stop Saudi who want to recruit our refs Apparently England, the AVAR and Oliver the 4th Official had all been in UAE on Thursday with FA approval. What is going on here?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CrazyBadger Ware 02 Oct 23 9.57am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Putitout
They brought VAR in to tidy refereeing up ,get more correct decisions. Two opinions better than one, one possibly more considered. That didn’t always work, so they increased the opinions to three, and guess what already within a few early games the decisions become three times more bizarre . Is there a way out of this? Well if there is it doesn’t look like having more opinions is the way . What about better refs in the first instant.? I know I've said it before, but VAR in it's current incarnation is broke. Whether it's the technology is not easy enough to use, or the people using it are incompetent, it is currently not fit for purpose. It should be removed for analysis, so 'they' can get it right.
"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.