It is. There does though seem to be a very large number of parties involved which must make the subsequent negotiations and compromises very difficult.

Whether that means that introducing thresholds to make that process easier and quicker is justified is a reasonable question.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Good old Nick.

The debate has moved on to the realities of far too much immigration, but he is still talking about 'fascists'.

Power to the people!!!!

Is true but at least with PR compromises have to be negotiated so that some form of consensus can be found before a government is formed. That avoids big swings in policy.

Not so with first past the post. Extreme elements within a party can take control and once in power affect major changes. Which have to be undone once they get replaced, as they always do eventually. This has hampered our progress throughout my lifetime. We would never had suffered Brexit under PR.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

More voted for than against Brexit. PR in action.

You clearly don’t understand the Cornwall concept of one way Stirling. Stop putting facts in the way of his fiction

At least he's showing his handler that he's trying.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)