Climate Change Activists

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Climate Change Activists

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 8 of 48 < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

cryrst The garden of England 23 Jul 22 8.23pm
I just watched a documentary about the Great Barrier Reef and shipwrecks. That was the first half. Then it went on to how in the last 600,000 years it has dried out with a drop in water levels allied to the ice caps forming and then melting 6 times. This was proved with a piece from close to the bottom bought up and anylyzed. They were impressed with how it re grew. So the only reference to ‘climate change’ ish was the speed it was happening. The last time was 20,000 years ago. Not one scientist specifically mentioned the last 200 years and our fault. Why not I wonder. Just saying it’s all bollox and maybe the colours nailed to the mast by so many are fading.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 23 Jul 22 8.23pm

I just watched a documentary about the Great Barrier Reef and shipwrecks. That was the first half. Then it went on to how in the last 600,000 years it has dried out with a drop in water levels allied to the ice caps forming and then melting 6 times. This was proved with a piece from close to the bottom bought up and anylyzed. They were impressed with how it re grew. So the only reference to ‘climate change’ ish was the speed it was happening. The last time was 20,000 years ago. Not one scientist specifically mentioned the last 200 years and our fault. Why not I wonder. Just saying it’s all bollox and maybe the colours nailed to the mast by so many are fading.

Alert a moderator to this post

Grumbles 23 Jul 22 8.33pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Well, haystacks can spontaneously combust, if that answers your question. So can flour dust. Flour dust can actually be explosive.
Alert a moderator to this post

Grumbles 23 Jul 22 8.33pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Well, haystacks can spontaneously combust, if that answers your question. So can flour dust.

Flour dust can actually be explosive.

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 23 Jul 22 9.16pm
Originally posted by Grumbles Flour dust can actually be explosive. I’ve seen the same movie
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 23 Jul 22 9.16pm

Originally posted by Grumbles

Flour dust can actually be explosive.

I’ve seen the same movie

Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle 23 Jul 22 10.50pm
Who are the "swivel eyed loons" in this debate? Why isn't it the fleck-faced finger pointers screaming "Denier!" at people who think it not unreasonable that a planet's climate might change over the course of time and don't feel particularly responsible for it?
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

23 Jul 22 10.50pm

Who are the "swivel eyed loons" in this debate? Why isn't it the fleck-faced finger pointers screaming "Denier!" at people who think it not unreasonable that a planet's climate might change over the course of time and don't feel particularly responsible for it?

Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree Croydon 23 Jul 22 11.37pm
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle Who are the "swivel eyed loons" in this debate? Why isn't it the fleck-faced finger pointers screaming "Denier!" at people who think it not unreasonable that a planet's climate might change over the course of time and don't feel particularly responsible for it? No. It’s unthinkable it would change anywhere near this speed The swivel eyed loons are those that took the GCCs message and not only promoted it but accelerated it. Even though it was entirely based on lies and stopped us properly addressing the impending nightmare. [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree

Croydon 23 Jul 22 11.37pm

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

No. It’s unthinkable it would change anywhere near this speed

The swivel eyed loons are those that took the GCCs message and not only promoted it but accelerated it. Even though it was entirely based on lies and stopped us properly addressing the impending nightmare.

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 24 Jul 22 4.38am
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle Who are the "swivel eyed loons" in this debate? Why isn't it the fleck-faced finger pointers screaming "Denier!" at people who think it not unreasonable that a planet's climate might change over the course of time and don't feel particularly responsible for it? Exactly. I’ve stated many times that I believe we are affecting the climate. My point has always been to what degree and why I think most and a huge most of the change is cyclical and natural. Bearing in mind the earth is a living ‘thing’. A fella called Darwin came up with life being allied to something called evolution. Maybe just maybe the earth is just, well, evolving and we happen to be lucky/unlucky and intelligent enough to be around to study this.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 24 Jul 22 4.38am

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Exactly. I’ve stated many times that I believe we are affecting the climate. My point has always been to what degree and why I think most and a huge most of the change is cyclical and natural. Bearing in mind the earth is a living ‘thing’. A fella called Darwin came up with life being allied to something called evolution. Maybe just maybe the earth is just, well, evolving and we happen to be lucky/unlucky and intelligent enough to be around to study this.

Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle 24 Jul 22 5.49am
One thing we could try would be to convince people they won't necessarily die of dehydration without having a bottle of water to hand 24/7. 91% of plastic produced isn't recycled and 1.2 million bottles are used every minute.
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

24 Jul 22 5.49am

One thing we could try would be to convince people they won't necessarily die of dehydration without having a bottle of water to hand 24/7.
91% of plastic produced isn't recycled and 1.2 million bottles are used every minute.

Alert a moderator to this post

Dubai Eagle 24 Jul 22 7.24am
bottles of water & coffee in takeaway cups are modern day fashion must haves. We grew up drinking water from the kitchen tap when we were thirsty. Originally posted by Teddy Eagle One thing we could try would be to convince people they won't necessarily die of dehydration without having a bottle of water to hand 24/7. 91% of plastic produced isn't recycled and 1.2 million bottles are used every minute.
Alert a moderator to this post

Dubai Eagle

24 Jul 22 7.24am

bottles of water & coffee in takeaway cups are modern day fashion must haves.

We grew up drinking water from the kitchen tap when we were thirsty.

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Alert a moderator to this post

W12 24 Jul 22 3.15pm
Originally posted by cryrst Exactly. I’ve stated many times that I believe we are affecting the climate. My point has always been to what degree and why I think most and a huge most of the change is cyclical and natural. Bearing in mind the earth is a living ‘thing’. A fella called Darwin came up with life being allied to something called evolution. Maybe just maybe the earth is just, well, evolving and we happen to be lucky/unlucky and intelligent enough to be around to study this. Also the assumption that warming is apocalyptic is just wrong. There were vineyards in Scotland when the Romans were here and everything is easier to grow with a warm climate. At the heart of it the idea that CO2 is some kind of pollutant is just madness. It’s literally the gas of life.
Alert a moderator to this post

W12 24 Jul 22 3.15pm

Originally posted by cryrst

Also the assumption that warming is apocalyptic is just wrong.

There were vineyards in Scotland when the Romans were here and everything is easier to grow with a warm climate.

At the heart of it the idea that CO2 is some kind of pollutant is just madness. It’s literally the gas of life.

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 24 Jul 22 3.59pm
Originally posted by W12 Also the assumption that warming is apocalyptic is just wrong. There were vineyards in Scotland when the Romans were here and everything is easier to grow with a warm climate. At the heart of it the idea that CO2 is some kind of pollutant is just madness. It’s literally the gas of life. Well that is definitely my take. I also agree with another poster and have researched methane as being 28 times more powerful over a 100 year period of warming the planet than CO2. Read my post from yesterday about the Great Barrier Reef draining and ice caps melting. It has reborn itself 6 x in 600,000 years. I have also stated that yes, we are affecting the climate with emissions but I feel our input is negligible compared to natural climate change.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 24 Jul 22 3.59pm

Originally posted by W12

Also the assumption that warming is apocalyptic is just wrong.

There were vineyards in Scotland when the Romans were here and everything is easier to grow with a warm climate.

At the heart of it the idea that CO2 is some kind of pollutant is just madness. It’s literally the gas of life.

Well that is definitely my take. I also agree with another poster and have researched methane as being 28 times more powerful over a 100 year period of warming the planet than CO2. Read my post from yesterday about the Great Barrier Reef draining and ice caps melting. It has reborn itself 6 x in 600,000 years. I have also stated that yes, we are affecting the climate with emissions but I feel our input is negligible compared to natural climate change.

Alert a moderator to this post