I've always thought "assists" is a bit of a pointless statistic, Wilf has 2 this season, but this shows chances created as well which shows hlm well out in front. It's not his fault if he sets someone up who then misses it.
Similarly passes is pretty meaningless without knowing if it was a sideways tap or 40 yard defence splitter but it does show some notable performers.

[Link]

Fantastic

“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

Most of the statistics used to determine how well a team or a player is doing are pretty pointless.

Shots on target - a weak, scuffed shot straight to the keeper is a shot on target but one that hits the post or crossbar is a miss.

Passing accuracy - always looks good for players that constantly pass sideways and back.

Goals scored include penalties. Luka scored lots of goals one season but only one wasn't a penalty.

Fouls committed - there's a difference between a little push and a Luke Ayling style cruncher.

For me its about options.

Lets assume we get rid of Benteke...I know, unlikely.

But then we'd have JPM, OE, LP, WZ and JA that could play up top

Then we'd have WZ, MO, JA, EE, and OE that could fill the wide spots.

Unless something mad happens over the summer, Wilf starts if fit. So if we get a better striker than JPM, Zaha stays wide. If we get a great new wide man, Wilf moves up top.

I'd go so far to say that one of our strengths is that we have a really adaptable front line. With probably only JPM and MO that ply in 1 position.