UFO’s

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

UFO’s

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 8 of 26 < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 15 Mar 21 11.09am
Originally posted by Palace Old Geezer A good year. Maybe I am an alien. Look out, I'm coming for you. Cue creepy music and flashing strobes: perhaps all life is alien? Red and Blue Army!
Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC

Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 15 Mar 21 11.09am

Originally posted by Palace Old Geezer

A good year. Maybe I am an alien.

Look out, I'm coming for you.

Cue creepy music and flashing strobes: perhaps all life is alien?

Red and Blue Army!

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 15 Mar 21 1.32pm
Originally posted by Palace Old Geezer Huh! Useless against the kind of advanced weaponry I have at my disposal. If it was good enough for James T. Kirk, then it's good enough for me. He downed a Gorn with a few bits of coal, sulphur, some diamonds and a bit of Bamboo. You don't need all that tech stuff. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (15 Mar 2021 1.37pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

15 Mar 21 1.32pm

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Originally posted by Palace Old Geezer

Huh! Useless against the kind of advanced weaponry I have at my disposal.

If it was good enough for James T. Kirk, then it's good enough for me.

He downed a Gorn with a few bits of coal, sulphur, some diamonds and a bit of Bamboo.

You don't need all that tech stuff.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (15 Mar 2021 1.37pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Palace Old Geezer Midhurst 15 Mar 21 1.37pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger If it was good enough for James T. Kirk, then it's good enough for me. He killed a Gorn with a few bits of coal, sulphur, some diamonds and a bit of Bamboo. You don't need all that tech stuff. Oh alright then. You win. I'll just go back to my home planet far, far away.
Alert a moderator to this post

Palace Old Geezer

Midhurst 15 Mar 21 1.37pm

Send a Private Message to Palace Old Geezer

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

If it was good enough for James T. Kirk, then it's good enough for me.

He killed a Gorn with a few bits of coal, sulphur, some diamonds and a bit of Bamboo.

You don't need all that tech stuff.

Oh alright then. You win. I'll just go back to my home planet far, far away.

Alert a moderator to this post

Lombardinho London 16 Mar 21 8.47pm
Here's something really juicy recorded just over a month ago. The main topic is Area 51 YouTube but you need two hours and 8 minutes spare to get to the end. But it's worth it. [Link] Love and laughter will protect us.
Alert a moderator to this post

Lombardinho

London 16 Mar 21 8.47pm

Here's something really juicy recorded just over a month ago.

The main topic is Area 51

YouTube but you need two hours and 8 minutes spare to get to the end. But it's worth it.

[Link]

Love and laughter will protect us.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 17 Mar 21 9.56am
Originally posted by Lombardinho Here's something really juicy recorded just over a month ago. The main topic is Area 51 YouTube but you need two hours and 8 minutes spare to get to the end. But it's worth it. [Link] Love and laughter will protect us. Got bored after eight minutes. The presentation didn't really lend itself to credibility did it. Some of the men tasked with clearing up Roswell told their families that it was aliens and that recovered technology was back engineered later. I have heard a similar story via people with some personal experience. Are they all really making it up? I suspect not. One has to weigh all the evidence and not just focus one incident at a time.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

17 Mar 21 9.56am

Originally posted by Lombardinho

Here's something really juicy recorded just over a month ago.

The main topic is Area 51

YouTube but you need two hours and 8 minutes spare to get to the end. But it's worth it.

[Link]

Love and laughter will protect us.

Got bored after eight minutes. The presentation didn't really lend itself to credibility did it.

Some of the men tasked with clearing up Roswell told their families that it was aliens and that recovered technology was back engineered later. I have heard a similar story via people with some personal experience.

Are they all really making it up?

I suspect not.

One has to weigh all the evidence and not just focus one incident at a time.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 17 Mar 21 10.17am
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Got bored after eight minutes. The presentation didn't really lend itself to credibility did it. Some of the men tasked with clearing up Roswell told their families that it was aliens and that recovered technology was back engineered later. I have heard a similar story via people with some personal experience. Are they all really making it up? I suspect not. One has to weigh all the evidence and not just focus one incident at a time. If I had to take a position I'd say that UFOs are real, though probably rare in relation to their reporting. As to what they are....that's a whole other layer. In relation to the witnesses I think it's similar to the Loch Ness monster. Some people will outright lie, some will experienced events they can't explain or that shook them up and attribute it to Nessie and others will be away with the fairies. Studies have come to the conclusion that there wouldn't be enough prey to support Nessie so I think it comes down to more of the imagination than reality. However, when it comes to UFOs, there is far more evidence that is harder to dispute. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

17 Mar 21 10.17am

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Got bored after eight minutes. The presentation didn't really lend itself to credibility did it.

Are they all really making it up?

I suspect not.

One has to weigh all the evidence and not just focus one incident at a time.

If I had to take a position I'd say that UFOs are real, though probably rare in relation to their reporting. As to what they are....that's a whole other layer.

In relation to the witnesses I think it's similar to the Loch Ness monster. Some people will outright lie, some will experienced events they can't explain or that shook them up and attribute it to Nessie and others will be away with the fairies.

Studies have come to the conclusion that there wouldn't be enough prey to support Nessie so I think it comes down to more of the imagination than reality.

However, when it comes to UFOs, there is far more evidence that is harder to dispute.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 17 Mar 21 10.37am
Originally posted by Stirlingsays If I had to take a position I'd say that UFOs are real, though probably rare in relation to their reporting. As to what they are....that's a whole other layer. In relation to the witnesses I think it's similar to the Loch Ness monster. Some people will outright lie, some will experienced events they can't explain or that shook them up and attribute it to Nessie and others will be away with the fairies. Studies have come to the conclusion that there wouldn't be enough prey to support Nessie so I think it comes down to more of the imagination than reality. However, when it comes to UFOs, there is far more evidence that is harder to dispute. Unfortunately, in the wacky world of television and internet, all these curiosities become fodder for entertainment purposes and the lines are blurred between what is highly plausible and what is totally bonkers.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

17 Mar 21 10.37am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

If I had to take a position I'd say that UFOs are real, though probably rare in relation to their reporting. As to what they are....that's a whole other layer.

Studies have come to the conclusion that there wouldn't be enough prey to support Nessie so I think it comes down to more of the imagination than reality.

However, when it comes to UFOs, there is far more evidence that is harder to dispute.

Unfortunately, in the wacky world of television and internet, all these curiosities become fodder for entertainment purposes and the lines are blurred between what is highly plausible and what is totally bonkers.

Alert a moderator to this post

Lombardinho London 17 Mar 21 10.48am
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Got bored after eight minutes. The presentation didn't really lend itself to credibility did it. Some of the men tasked with clearing up Roswell told their families that it was aliens and that recovered technology was back engineered later. I have heard a similar story via people with some personal experience. Are they all really making it up? I suspect not. One has to weigh all the evidence and not just focus one incident at a time. Yes it has a slow start. I was getting bored after twenty minutes and nearly switched off. But I stuck with it. The presentation has no relation to its credibility whatsoever. There's plenty of stuff to get your teeth into once you're done.
Alert a moderator to this post

Lombardinho

London 17 Mar 21 10.48am

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Got bored after eight minutes. The presentation didn't really lend itself to credibility did it.

Are they all really making it up?

I suspect not.

One has to weigh all the evidence and not just focus one incident at a time.

Yes it has a slow start. I was getting bored after twenty minutes and nearly switched off. But I stuck with it. The presentation has no relation to its credibility whatsoever.

There's plenty of stuff to get your teeth into once you're done.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 17 Mar 21 11.14am
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Unfortunately, in the wacky world of television and internet, all these curiosities become fodder for entertainment purposes and the lines are blurred between what is highly plausible and what is totally bonkers. If we can get an accurate answer to the Fermi paradox we can effectively take any censoring of information out of the equation and we would be far closer to answering questions on our place in the universe and our relationship to other life. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

17 Mar 21 11.14am

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

If we can get an accurate answer to the Fermi paradox we can effectively take any censoring of information out of the equation and we would be far closer to answering questions on our place in the universe and our relationship to other life.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 17 Mar 21 12.39pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays If we can get an accurate answer to the Fermi paradox we can effectively take any censoring of information out of the equation and we would be far closer to answering questions on our place in the universe and our relationship to other life. The obvious answer is that the Fermi paradox is just a symptom of censorship. It's quite likely that the universe is largely uniform but how many factors have to come together to allow for a complex life supporting planet is unknown. It is very possible that life is scarce in relative terms. In a galaxy with billions of stars, that still means there is likely to be a significant number of Earth like planets, but with solid evidence for only one and that one having a very complex path to supporting life, it is still a big question. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (17 Mar 2021 12.39pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

17 Mar 21 12.39pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

The obvious answer is that the Fermi paradox is just a symptom of censorship.
It's quite likely that the universe is largely uniform but how many factors have to come together to allow for a complex life supporting planet is unknown.
It is very possible that life is scarce in relative terms.
In a galaxy with billions of stars, that still means there is likely to be a significant number of Earth like planets, but with solid evidence for only one and that one having a very complex path to supporting life, it is still a big question.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (17 Mar 2021 12.39pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 17 Mar 21 1.31pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger The obvious answer is that the Fermi paradox is just a symptom of censorship. It's quite likely that the universe is largely uniform but how many factors have to come together to allow for a complex life supporting planet is unknown. It is very possible that life is scarce in relative terms. In a galaxy with billions of stars, that still means there is likely to be a significant number of Earth like planets, but with solid evidence for only one and that one having a very complex path to supporting life, it is still a big question. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (17 Mar 2021 12.39pm) I agree. I also like the idea....and there are many ideas on the Fermi paradox that this is a simulation and there is no requirement to build in other civilisations....essentially beyond a certain point we are observing a visual 'software toolbox' as it were. I'm not saying I go along with that but I like the contention......Some solutions to the paradox are quite scary while others simply fascinating....but only one can be true. Another one I like is the inter dimensional...At some point civilisations work out how to access other dimensions and that's why we don't see evidence of galaxy colonization. Edited by Stirlingsays (17 Mar 2021 1.43pm) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

17 Mar 21 1.31pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (17 Mar 2021 12.39pm)

I agree.

I also like the idea....and there are many ideas on the Fermi paradox that this is a simulation and there is no requirement to build in other civilisations....essentially beyond a certain point we are observing a visual 'software toolbox' as it were.

I'm not saying I go along with that but I like the contention......Some solutions to the paradox are quite scary while others simply fascinating....but only one can be true.

Another one I like is the inter dimensional...At some point civilisations work out how to access other dimensions and that's why we don't see evidence of galaxy colonization.

Edited by Stirlingsays (17 Mar 2021 1.43pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Lombardinho London 18 Mar 21 12.11am
I'm on a bit of a roll with this stuff YouTube just over an hour. This guy is fearless. No wonder he was taken out. The bit where he explained how he lost his fingers was particularly gripping ( no pun intended) [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Lombardinho

London 18 Mar 21 12.11am

I'm on a bit of a roll with this stuff

YouTube just over an hour.

This guy is fearless. No wonder he was taken out.

The bit where he explained how he lost his fingers was particularly gripping ( no pun intended)

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 8 of 26 < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

UFO’s

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors