I'm just sick to death of you repeating yours for the hundredth time.

We get it. You can't accept democracy and everyone else is wrong.

The answer is entirely in your own hands. No-one is compelled to read what I have to say let alone respond to anything.

You don't get it at all so yes you are wrong. I respect democracy. I don't believe in referendums as they are not part of our system. They are a fudge. A cop out by our elected representatives seeking to avoid taking the blame. When the system is broke then we need to change it. FPTP is really broken.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

The Supreme Court did no such thing. It offered no opinion on the merits, or otherwise, of anything being done by the government, including Brexit.

All it did was rule that the PM deciding to prorogue in the way he did was unlawful as it restricted Parliament's duty to scrutinise.

It only did that because it was asked to rule. It did not bring the action itself!

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

MPs are public servants - as such their only duty was to serve the will of the people. They failed miserably and got the boot at the next election. The Supreme Court and the Speaker revealed their true colours and have and will also pay the price.
Those are the people to blame for Boris. Had they carried out their one duty they would still have jobs. Oh well, I'm not crying over so many stuffed shirts. At least the people got their will in the end. Democracy eventually served.

Red and Blue Army!

I will doubtless get criticised for repetition but you are yet another who doesn't understand the way our democracy actually works.

MP's are not public servants. They are our elected representatives, sent to Parliament to decide things for us. Our sole task is to choose who we want to represent us. After that they make their own decisions. They don't "serve the will of the people"! They determine what the people need and not what they want. If we don't like the results then we change them for others when we get the opportunity.

The Supreme Court simply did it's job. It was asked to rule on a matter of law and it did. If it had not been asked it would not have been involved in any way.

The Speaker also did his job. He protected the rights of Parliament and stood up for the back benchers. That he frustrated the government was obvious but that was their own fault as they attempted to over reach themselves and tried to sideline Parliament.

It is Parliament is that is sovereign and not the government. No government, or PM, can do very much unless it can carry Parliament with it. Right now, with an 80 seat majority and a new bunch of compliant Tory MPs, that's easy but the fact remains. It's Parliament, and not the government, which is the ultimate authority.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

This is the problem though. There are too many politicians being elected for reasons other than than their political expertise. For example those two parliamentary titans in north London, one of whom can’t put her shoes on the right feet and the other who thought Marie Antoinette won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1903. These are the intellectual powerhouses who should have made the decision for us.