You are literally repeating the Democrat's contentions on Russia as some kind of proven fact.....and as for the right....I literally gave you Tucker Carlson saying this is Bulls*** right there and then.

There are however ethical representatives of both sides and I just gave you two there.

You do have some very odd ideas! Just because the "Democrats" accept what some well informed analysts have deduced doesn't mean that they are their "contentions" at all. It just means that they are able to recognise ducks quacks as probably coming from ducks. That the Trump apologists at Fox seek to pick holes, no matter how flimsy their reasoning might be, is just their normal propaganda.

I don't see any desire to "get" Assange! I see a determination to expose the truth and out traitors in an environment in which anything critical of the top man is presented as "fake news" both by him and his apologists.

I read this paragraph and once again it's hard to square your statements with reality....So you are saying 'Jimmy Dore' isn't a left wing commentator now?

Like I said, I think you have just fallen for BS, similar to your 'collusion delusions'.

As I said I haven't any experience of "Jimmy Dore" so no knowledge of his stance, beyond what I referenced. This suggests he is a bit of a mixture so to put him into a box marked "left wing commentator" is simplistic and disingenuous. To suggest that everything "left" is bad, and every "right" is good is as clearly nonsense as to suggest the reverse.

I don't see a quick resolution to this at all because there are likely to be challenges and appeals galore motivated by a desire by some to keep this buried for as long as possible. I hope though that you are right although I fear that Assange would simply refuse to say anything, as Manning has.

As to "collusion delusion" I have none, but suspect many think that the Mueller report can now gather dust as a filed document. I don't. I think it is the opening salvo in a battle which will be fought in many places as part of a much bigger war for the truth.

Edited by Wisbech Eagle (14 Apr 2019 10.26am)

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Traitor?

What on earth are you talking about? Assange is an Australian.....Traitor? What??

Nothing Wikileaks has ever released has needed to be retracted.

JRM has just pointed that Assange's main reason for whistle-blowing was to bring to account illegal actions of the US troops etc.

So if he is standing up for law and & order why did he try and evade justice himself. Sometimes you have to be a martyr Dr King and Gandhi understood that and were prepared to go to gaol Assange is nothing like them.

Edited by Badger11 (15 Apr 2019 10.52am)

I suggest that Asange would get straight into the first team at mighty Palace if they could get him on a free.