This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
No black and Asian protesters
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Mapletree  Croydon 14 Jul 18 10.59pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Brentmiester_General
So racism wasn’t punishable by a custodial sentence before the internet? By 1986 there had been 35 prosecutions under The Race Relations Act 1976. 25 people were convicted.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Brentmiester_General Front line in the battle against t... 14 Jul 18 11.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
By 1986 there had been 35 prosecutions under The Race Relations Act 1976. 25 people were convicted. Thank you Mapletree.
"We love you Palace, we f@cking hate Man U, We love you Palace, we hate the brighton too, We love you Palace we play in red 'n' blue, so f@ck you, and you ... |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 14 Jul 18 11.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Brentmiester_General
Thank you Mapletree. Worldwide web started in 1990 by the way. I can emphatically assure you. If you are emphatic enough, often people won’t question you Edited by Mapletree (14 Jul 2018 11.43pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 14 Jul 18 11.45pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
By 1986 there had been 35 prosecutions under The Race Relations Act 1976. 25 people were convicted. These were free speech prosecutions? Because that's what we are talking about here. If you could link me to this information. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Jul 2018 11.48pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 14 Jul 18 11.47pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Worldwide web started in 1990 by the way. I can emphatically assure you. If you are emphatic enough, often people won’t question you Edited by Mapletree (14 Jul 2018 11.43pm) It wasn't popular until the late nineties as stated.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 14 Jul 18 11.50pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
These were free speech prosecutions? Because that's what we are talking about here. If you could link me to this information. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Jul 2018 11.48pm) I merely report what I find on Hansard. My point was in direct response to what seemed a clear question. The question also did not mention social media Edited by Mapletree (14 Jul 2018 11.55pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 14 Jul 18 11.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
I merely report what I find on Hansard. You write, 'If you are emphatic enough, often people won’t question you '. It is blindingly obvious to even a simpleton that real restrictions on free speech in this country weren't introduced until Tony Blair's era.....and they haven't been pursued aggressively until relatively recently. Yet in a debate about restrictions on free speech before the rise of social media you present the 'race relations act' as some form of claim that they were An act which was far more concerned about the restrictions of services and rights than the expression of free speech. Disingenuous. Edited by Stirlingsays (15 Jul 2018 12.07am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 15 Jul 18 12.08am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
You write, 'If you are emphatic enough, often people won’t question you '. It is blindingly obvious to even a simpleton that real restrictions on free speech in this country weren't introduced until Tony Blair's era.....and they haven't been pursued until relatively recently. Yet in a debate about restrictions on free speech before the rise of social media you present the 'race relations act' as some form of claim that they were An act which was far more concerned about the restrictions of services and rights than the expression of free speech. Disingenuous. Edited by Stirlingsays (15 Jul 2018 12.02am) Oh dear me. Clutching at straws. I responded to a question. I answered that question correctly. You somehow read into that answer a variety of intentions and accuse me of being disingenuous. I am used to you accusing me of things but this is a bit silly. Just take the shame. Your emphatic answer was not correct given the question asked. I guess you must have been trying to answer a different question
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 15 Jul 18 12.12am |
|
|---|---|
|
This post was inaccurate.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 15 Jul 18 12.17am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Oh dear me. Clutching at straws. I responded to a question. I answered that question correctly. You somehow read into that answer a variety of intentions and accuse me of being disingenuous. I am used to you accusing me of things but this is a bit silly. Just take the shame. Your emphatic answer was not correct given the question asked. I guess you must have been trying to answer a different question There's no shame here, that's a silly concept the left have taken from the religious. If you only intended your response to apply to the racism question and not spill over into the free speech one then yep.....I take back the disingenuous comment.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dannyboy1978 15 Jul 18 6.47am |
|
|---|---|
|
Just an observation again to those who keep saying there are lots of different ethnicities protesting. Their really isn't!!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| laddo london 15 Jul 18 7.36am |
|
|---|---|
|
The fact this is even a thread is a fcuked up. Who gives a sh*te if there are black, brown, pink, blue faces on the march. Trump is a c**t who uses this language of division to get votes. But, let's be frank here, softy bullsh*t liberals gave birth to Trump as their political correctness bollox meant people protested in the ballot box, fearing legitimate debate would be yelled down as racist. We did the same with brexit.
laddo "People say, live fast, die young. I say live fast, die old. That's me, the non-conformist". |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.