Prof. schools C4 News anchor on gender pay myth

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Prof. schools C4 News anchor on gender pay myth

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 8 of 9 < 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

Stirlingsays 29 Jan 18 10.20pm
Originally posted by DanH That’s literally what this board is 99% of the time. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

29 Jan 18 10.20pm

Originally posted by DanH

That’s literally what this board is 99% of the time.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Penge Eagle Beckenham 30 Jan 18 6.17pm
Originally posted by Cucking Funt You shouldn't post so much then.
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

Penge Eagle

Beckenham 30 Jan 18 6.17pm

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

You shouldn't post so much then.

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

Penge Eagle Beckenham 30 Jan 18 6.44pm
First and second wave feminism has meant that today men and women generally ARE equal. The vast majority of women do NOT consider themselves third-wave feminists. Third-wave feminists are a small but very loud bunch of Marxists and they want to control people. They are trying to bully us all into following their narrative, which is generally anti white male and the left-wing men (the male feminists/soy boys) conform to this. The feminist Marxists ignore the achievements and beauty of the likes of Ivanka and Melania Trump, who are successful women role models, simply because they hold right-wing views and are attractive (unlike them!). Same goes for Trump's female campaign manager Kellyanne Conway who should be a champion of REAL feminism. They would ignore the political achievements of women in UK politics, because they are Conservative (Maggie Thatcher). The hypocrisy is there to see as the Marxists say and do nothing about women being called "bitches" and "hoes" and being "raped" by rappers (many convicted felons) and the objectivity of women in hip-hop videos. They say and do nothing about women's rights in the Muslim world (FGM, underage marriage, sex slaves). They have forced bikini-clad women adverts from public transport in London. They don't allow women to be individuals (even this week, stopping women from being darts walk-on girls), but instead force them into a collective and they must conform to THEIR WAY or else... Abuse you online, write negative articles, smash up your property or jail you if elected. They care about a warped ideology, not equality. Karl Marx would be proud. Edited by Penge Eagle (30 Jan 2018 7.06pm)
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

Penge Eagle

Beckenham 30 Jan 18 6.44pm

First and second wave feminism has meant that today men and women generally ARE equal. The vast majority of women do NOT consider themselves third-wave feminists.

Third-wave feminists are a small but very loud bunch of Marxists and they want to control people. They are trying to bully us all into following their narrative, which is generally anti white male and the left-wing men (the male feminists/soy boys) conform to this.

The feminist Marxists ignore the achievements and beauty of the likes of Ivanka and Melania Trump, who are successful women role models, simply because they hold right-wing views and are attractive (unlike them!). Same goes for Trump's female campaign manager Kellyanne Conway who should be a champion of REAL feminism. They would ignore the political achievements of women in UK politics, because they are Conservative (Maggie Thatcher).

The hypocrisy is there to see as the Marxists say and do nothing about women being called "bitches" and "hoes" and being "raped" by rappers (many convicted felons) and the objectivity of women in hip-hop videos. They say and do nothing about women's rights in the Muslim world (FGM, underage marriage, sex slaves).

They have forced bikini-clad women adverts from public transport in London. They don't allow women to be individuals (even this week, stopping women from being darts walk-on girls), but instead force them into a collective and they must conform to THEIR WAY or else... Abuse you online, write negative articles, smash up your property or jail you if elected. They care about a warped ideology, not equality. Karl Marx would be proud.

Edited by Penge Eagle (30 Jan 2018 7.06pm)

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

DanH SW2 31 Jan 18 4.23pm
Originally posted by Cucking Funt You shouldn't post so much then. Oi. My political discourse may be GCSE but my #bantz is pure PhD level mate.
Alert a moderator to this post

DanH

SW2 31 Jan 18 4.23pm

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

You shouldn't post so much then.

Oi.

My political discourse may be GCSE but my #bantz is pure PhD level mate.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 31 Jan 18 4.28pm
Originally posted by DanH Oi. My political discourse may be GCSE but my #bantz is pure PhD level mate. You must come from Bantchester.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

31 Jan 18 4.28pm

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Originally posted by DanH

Oi.

My political discourse may be GCSE but my #bantz is pure PhD level mate.

You must come from Bantchester.

Alert a moderator to this post

johnfirewall 31 Jan 18 7.09pm
You could probably get me to accept for a split second that eradicating all objectification of women is fundamental to achieving equality. But then why would women bother presenting themselves appealingly if doing so for the purpose of attracting a mate is demeaning? Would that still be a valid scenario where a male is allowed to evaluate the appearance of a female? Because the feminist logic dictates otherwise. And that leaves the case of the males. How should this apply to them improving their appearance? Some may argue that this is irrelevant to the debate but the extremists still maintain a refusal to exist for the pleasure of males, even in the context of a casual fond glance.
Alert a moderator to this post

johnfirewall

31 Jan 18 7.09pm

You could probably get me to accept for a split second that eradicating all objectification of women is fundamental to achieving equality. But then why would women bother presenting themselves appealingly if doing so for the purpose of attracting a mate is demeaning? Would that still be a valid scenario where a male is allowed to evaluate the appearance of a female? Because the feminist logic dictates otherwise. And that leaves the case of the males. How should this apply to them improving their appearance?

Some may argue that this is irrelevant to the debate but the extremists still maintain a refusal to exist for the pleasure of males, even in the context of a casual fond glance.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 31 Jan 18 7.34pm
I have observed that the people most likely to object to pretty, scantily clad women are usually fat ugly ones. Likewise, people who object to flirting and admiring attractive women are usually ones who don't get any sex. One word. Jealousy.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

31 Jan 18 7.34pm

I have observed that the people most likely to object to pretty, scantily clad women are usually fat ugly ones.

Likewise, people who object to flirting and admiring attractive women are usually ones who don't get any sex.

One word. Jealousy.

Alert a moderator to this post

johnfirewall 31 Jan 18 7.39pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger I have observed that the people most likely to object to pretty, scantily clad women are usually fat ugly ones. Likewise, people who object to flirting and admiring attractive women are usually ones who don't get any sex. One word. Jealousy. I don't know, most of my exes claimed to be feminist...
Alert a moderator to this post

johnfirewall

31 Jan 18 7.39pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

I have observed that the people most likely to object to pretty, scantily clad women are usually fat ugly ones.

Likewise, people who object to flirting and admiring attractive women are usually ones who don't get any sex.

One word. Jealousy.

I don't know, most of my exes claimed to be feminist...

Alert a moderator to this post

Penge Eagle Beckenham 01 Feb 18 2.12am
F1 grid girls now BANNED by the feminists! [Link] [Tweet Link] Edited by Penge Eagle (01 Feb 2018 2.13am)
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

Penge Eagle

Beckenham 01 Feb 18 2.12am

F1 grid girls now BANNED by the feminists! [Link]

[Tweet Link]

Edited by Penge Eagle (01 Feb 2018 2.13am)

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

Stirlingsays 01 Feb 18 5.15am
Originally posted by johnfirewall You could probably get me to accept for a split second that eradicating all objectification of women is fundamental to achieving equality. But then why would women bother presenting themselves appealingly if doing so for the purpose of attracting a mate is demeaning? Would that still be a valid scenario where a male is allowed to evaluate the appearance of a female? Because the feminist logic dictates otherwise. And that leaves the case of the males. How should this apply to them improving their appearance? Some may argue that this is irrelevant to the debate but the extremists still maintain a refusal to exist for the pleasure of males, even in the context of a casual fond glance. The pursuit of so called 'equality' is anti choice.....as seen by the sacking of these grid girls and the dart girls before them. Feminists use words like 'equality' when in reality they want a repressive society that ignores nature in favour of social constructs that most women and men simply aren't happy with. They want equality of outcome and our mainstream TV media aren't allowing enough challenge to them in the public space. Channel 4 did recently with Jorden Peterson and instantly regretted it. Fcuk activists......and fcuk the corporations and politicians who support them. Edited by Stirlingsays (01 Feb 2018 5.16am) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

01 Feb 18 5.15am

Originally posted by johnfirewall

Some may argue that this is irrelevant to the debate but the extremists still maintain a refusal to exist for the pleasure of males, even in the context of a casual fond glance.

The pursuit of so called 'equality' is anti choice.....as seen by the sacking of these grid girls and the dart girls before them.

Feminists use words like 'equality' when in reality they want a repressive society that ignores nature in favour of social constructs that most women and men simply aren't happy with.

They want equality of outcome and our mainstream TV media aren't allowing enough challenge to them in the public space. Channel 4 did recently with Jorden Peterson and instantly regretted it.

Fcuk activists......and fcuk the corporations and politicians who support them.

Edited by Stirlingsays (01 Feb 2018 5.16am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 01 Feb 18 7.48am
Originally posted by Penge Eagle F1 grid girls now BANNED by the feminists! [Link] [Tweet Link] Edited by Penge Eagle (01 Feb 2018 2.13am) That sums it up nicely. The difference of course, is that Islam is not subject to commercial considerations.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

01 Feb 18 7.48am

Originally posted by Penge Eagle

F1 grid girls now BANNED by the feminists! [Link]

[Tweet Link]

Edited by Penge Eagle (01 Feb 2018 2.13am)

That sums it up nicely.

The difference of course, is that Islam is not subject to commercial considerations.

Alert a moderator to this post

Penge Eagle Beckenham 02 Feb 18 7.23pm
Where are the feminists?? [Tweet Link]
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

Penge Eagle

Beckenham 02 Feb 18 7.23pm

Where are the feminists??

[Tweet Link]

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

Page 8 of 9 < 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Prof. schools C4 News anchor on gender pay myth

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors