Worried by an unpicked harvest but not by exploited people who harvest it,

That is just spin. Labour foolishly set it in motion by the admission of one of their own leaders. They could have chosen not to. That is the key point.

And your stats are highly selective. Seven of the ten highest net immigration years have been under Labour.

Where exactly is the hypocrisy in enlightening another, in debate, about where an aspect of Britain that get up their nose had its nascence?

All I write here is merely political historical truth.

If you can show that the left are indeed responsible and signed on the dotted line for globalisation, mass immigration. banking deregulation and the selling of social housing stock without replenishment then go for it.

Edited by Kermit8 (13 Nov 2017 10.19pm)

I see, you are just 'educating' us are you? As Stalin said: "Education is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed."
Of the four items that you list, which ones are you in favour of - or shall we take a wild guess?
However, you can't blame any party of government for globalisation, it is a result of improved logistics and the Information Technology Revolution.
Labour (cheered on by the Liberals and Greens and far left parties) have been the party that has facilitated and encourage mass immigration despite your claims of 'political historical truth' - here's some though "rub the Right’s nose in diversity" ... "a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural" [Andrew Neather]; "In 2004 when as a Labour government, we were not only welcoming people to come into this country to work, we were sending out search parties for people and encouraging them, in some cases, to take up work in this country." [Lord Mandelson] He also stated that the influx of immigrants meant the party’s traditional supporters are now unable to find work. Between 1997 and 2010, net migration to Britain totalled more than 2.2million, more than twice the population of Birmingham. The annual net figure quadrupled under Labour from 48,000 people in 1997 to 198,000 by 2009.
Blair's governments carried out massive deregulation of banks. Since 1997 the Labour governments of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown developed a programme of what they called "better regulation". This included a general programme for government departments to review, simplify or abolish their existing regulations, and a "one in, one out" approach to new regulations. In 1997, The Chancellor of the Exchequer announced the "freeing" of the Bank of England to set monetary policy. They freed the Bank of England from direct government control and removed the power by the Bank of England[citation needed] (and therefore by the government) from controlling the financial activities of banks in the UK[citation needed]. In 2006, new primary legislation (the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006) was introduced to establish statutory principles and a code of practice and it permits ministers to make Regulatory Reform Orders (RROs) to deal with older laws which they deem to be out of date, obscure or irrelevant. This act has often been criticised and called "The abolition of Parliament Act".
The Labour governments did very little to replenish housing stocks. Under Labour, between 1997 and 2010 there were 2,780 council homes built with a peak of 320 in 2010. Since then, there have been 10,310 homes built by councils. since 2010 the housing stock in Labour councils rose by 3.5%, lower than the 4% in Tory-controlled ones.

Edited by hedgehog50 (14 Nov 2017 8.22am)

I see, you are just 'educating' us are you? As Stalin said: "Education is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed."
Of the four items that you list, which ones are you in favour of - or shall we take a wild guess?
However, you can't blame any party of government for globalisation, it is a result of improved logistics and the Information Technology Revolution.
Labour (cheered on by the Liberals and Greens and far left parties) have been the party that has facilitated and encourage mass immigration despite your claims of 'political historical truth' - here's some though "rub the Right’s nose in diversity" ... "a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural" [Andrew Neather]; "In 2004 when as a Labour government, we were not only welcoming people to come into this country to work, we were sending out search parties for people and encouraging them, in some cases, to take up work in this country." [Lord Mandelson] He also stated that the influx of immigrants meant the party’s traditional supporters are now unable to find work. Between 1997 and 2010, net migration to Britain totalled more than 2.2million, more than twice the population of Birmingham. The annual net figure quadrupled under Labour from 48,000 people in 1997 to 198,000 by 2009.
Blair's governments carried out massive deregulation of banks. Since 1997 the Labour governments of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown developed a programme of what they called "better regulation". This included a general programme for government departments to review, simplify or abolish their existing regulations, and a "one in, one out" approach to new regulations. In 1997, The Chancellor of the Exchequer announced the "freeing" of the Bank of England to set monetary policy. They freed the Bank of England from direct government control and removed the power by the Bank of England[citation needed] (and therefore by the government) from controlling the financial activities of banks in the UK[citation needed]. In 2006, new primary legislation (the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006) was introduced to establish statutory principles and a code of practice and it permits ministers to make Regulatory Reform Orders (RROs) to deal with older laws which they deem to be out of date, obscure or irrelevant. This act has often been criticised and called "The abolition of Parliament Act".
The Labour governments did very little to replenish housing stocks. Under Labour, between 1997 and 2010 there were 2,780 council homes built with a peak of 320 in 2010. Since then, there have been 10,310 homes built by councils. since 2010 the housing stock in Labour councils rose by 3.5%, lower than the 4% in Tory-controlled ones.

Edited by hedgehog50 (14 Nov 2017 8.22am)

Really? Perhaps we should just let your hypocrisy speak for itself.