This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 30 Jun 17 6.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ginger Pubic Wig
Is censorship by outcomes bad then? If so, why? I'm prepared to be won over because you seem like a bright bloke and I wouldn't pretend to be that smart. (And that's not false modesty). Up to now I would have thought it a good thing to think: I shouldn't say/do this bad thing because there might be a bad outcome for my employer and, by extension, me. Is censorship by outcomes bad then? If its affect upon society is negative then essentially in many cases, yes. My contention is a general one. Your argument about the effects upon a business of bad promotion has its merits. You made a forthright and sensible argument for practical business sense that deals with the bottom line. Also it's a sensible point that we don't have all the details. If an employee's actions have a negative affect then their value as an employee becomes more a liability than an asset. However, for just making a general point... I do think that principles matter and this guy's actions weren't deliberate just ill advised. I argue it required a warning personally.....so I'm having a moan. We are all seeing businesses cowering to bad press now and I'm reasonably sure that giving 'activists' all this power is a negative for society in general.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ginger Pubic Wig Wickham de L'Ouest 30 Jun 17 7.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Is censorship by outcomes bad then? If its affect upon society is negative then essentially in many cases, yes. My contention is a general one. Your argument about the effects upon a business of bad promotion has its merits. You made a forthright and sensible argument for practical business sense that deals with the bottom line. Also it's a sensible point that we don't have all the details. If an employee's actions have a negative affect then their value as an employee becomes more a liability than an asset. However, for just making a general point... I do think that principles matter and this guy's actions weren't deliberate just ill advised. I argue it required a warning personally.....so I'm having a moan. We are all seeing businesses cowering to bad press now and I'm reasonably sure that giving 'activists' all this power is a negative for society in general. Fair dues
If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 30 Jun 17 7.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I give up. Good. Shut the door on your way out.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 30 Jun 17 7.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Good. Shut the door on your way out. You know they will have to put your restraints back on after visiting time.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.