This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
jamiemartin721 Reading 17 May 16 9.34am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by fed up eagle
It's funny how a lot of these people are British when it suits them but then brag about being a proud Afghani or whatever. Edited by fed up eagle (16 May 2016 10.06pm) You can be both, people be British and ties to other countries. The nature of Britishness is cosmopolitian (you can be British and English / Scot / Welsh / Irish along with any number of small weird colony left overs. The people of the Falklands, for example, can be both British and Falklanders in their identity. So why not British and Afghani?
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 17 May 16 9.41am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Still going on with your implications of racism.......even though I've already said it doesn't matter about skin colour....don't you read? I used the white british point because the cenus is so biased against the English that it isn't even a bloody option to identify yourself as just English......So I made the white British point to explain that overall the the English population of London is a minority....Which to many people is actually a point!.....I even explained that I included those not white who would say they were English.....bloody Blimey. Here...shall I repeat myself for you seeing as you seem to miss points due to your prejudges. London is an English city which has a minority of English people in it....Sod white british or black british....It's an ENGLISH city....I don't care what colour they are.....You can be black and English or whatever colour and English. Some people on here, it's like tunnel vision. That's not true though. Plenty of the Black and Asian populations of London will have been born in England. However I get what you mean though, and its interesting. Living in Reading, there is a surprising number of people in the area who moved here from London. The determining factor in London's change is largely economic, the affluence of the 60s and 80s, saw a large number of people who benefitted from those changes from London, and these were largely people who were white, and had long historical family ties into the London boroughs. Migration from abroad filled the migration that was the suburban transit of a large number of people born into long term London families. The same era saw the growth of a lot of areas in the South East outside of London, where these people moved some for jobs, others for a different arguably perceived better life.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 17 May 16 9.44am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
That's not true though. Plenty of the Black and Asian populations of London will have been born in England. However I get what you mean though, and its interesting. Living in Reading, there is a surprising number of people in the area who moved here from London. The determining factor in London's change is largely economic, the affluence of the 60s and 80s, saw a large number of people who benefitted from those changes from London, and these were largely people who were white, and had long historical family ties into the London boroughs. Migration from abroad filled the migration that was the suburban transit of a large number of people born into long term London families. The same era saw the growth of a lot of areas in the South East outside of London, where these people moved some for jobs, others for a different arguably perceived better life.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 17 May 16 9.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by fed up eagle
I've served with Ghurkas, excellent soldiers, extremely tough and disciplined IMO. Funny you should mention the Gurkhas, as Reading has a Nepalese community, and a fair number of ex-Gurkhas in the area - We also have had problems with Nepalese organised crime and gangs. I also however agree, we have unemployed people that we should be getting into work. The problem for me, is one of geography and wages. The use of migrant labour, typically of young people from the poorer EU states, has kept wages down. Meanwhile benefits, have risen as they're tied to the actual cost of living. So we have a situation now that's very obvious, low skilled labour wages aren't sufficient to provide stability for families or even individuals. And you have a situation where people who do work are no better off than if they were unemployed. Given a minuimum wage around Reading, will probably mean you get to rent a room in a bedsit or house share for just over half you income. Its simply not worth working, when you can be better off on benefits, and maybe doing a few odd jobs or hours at the local Asda to top up (provided you do less than 16 hours a week). The outcome of this, you'll have more disposable income, than if you worked 37 hours a week - You won't have a lot, but you will have more - Plus you have more spare time. Why should people work. Also, people certainly can't to relocate to areas where such work is available, because they'd be massively worse off than staying where they are. We need to end the notion of profit being in and of itself the justification for everything. Fix a real working wage as the minimum, and subserdise the relocation of people from areas of high unemployment to fill jobs, whilst at the same time ending the EU work to rule. At present, society serves the interests of Corporations. Corporations must serve the needs of society. Successive governments failed to tie minimum wage to the costs of living.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
-TUX- Alphabettispaghetti 17 May 16 10.10am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
When we lived in Spain we met many couples who had children while living in the country.
Time to move forward together. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 17 May 16 1.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
We are all British according to our passport but that is just something that pro mass immigration people hide behind to deny the vast numbers of migrants and their offspring who now occupy our cities. Labeling someone as British has no meaning in the real world. The term English has no meaning at all apparently.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 17 May 16 1.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by -TUX-
When we lived in Spain we met many couples who had children while living in the country. Were they Spanish citizens? I don't particularly think of myself patricianly as British but I am, legally defined entirely as being a British Subject. I know a lot of people who are of Indian Ethnic Heritage, and they regard themselves as British and English (as do their parents). But ultimately, if you don't regard yourself as British, you are still British, its just your definition of what it means to be British is different to others. Just because you consider it less significant, it doesn't mean its less relevant.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 17 May 16 1.18pm | |
---|---|
You can swim against the tide of globalisation as much as you like but it will envelope you at some point. Better to ride the wave than fight it. After all, we were integral in starting it in the way our Empire worked. And many of us benefit from it, just look at where our Palace diaspora now live. Banging on about immigration all the time isn't going to make much of a difference but certainly takes up a lot of space on this site. It's getting beyond ridiculous. Barely room for any football talk. Personally I don't consider anyone to be English unless they can trace their blood line directly - without any outside influence - to the original inhabitants of Albion. The Greeks thought they came from Armorica, so we are all Frogs. Except then we had some Italians, Irish, Swedes, Norwegians, Icelanders, Danes, Germans, Dutch, more French and countless others who also decided they were English. And oddly we now consider ourselves Anglo Saxon. To me a South Londoner is a South Londoner. Don't care if they are part of a coven or worship the Goddess Annoia (the Goddess of Things That get Stuck in Drawers). If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidae on our hands.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 17 May 16 1.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
You can swim against the tide of globalisation as much as you like but it will envelope you at some point. Better to ride the wave than fight it. After all, we were integral in starting it in the way our Empire worked. And many of us benefit from it, just look at where our Palace diaspora now live. Banging on about immigration all the time isn't going to make much of a difference but certainly takes up a lot of space on this site. It's getting beyond ridiculous. Barely room for any football talk. Personally I don't consider anyone to be English unless they can trace their blood line directly - without any outside influence - to the original inhabitants of Albion. The Greeks thought they came from Armorica, so we are all Frogs. Except then we had some Italians, Irish, Swedes, Norwegians, Icelanders, Danes, Germans, Dutch, more French and countless others who also decided they were English. And oddly we now consider ourselves Anglo Saxon. To me a South Londoner is a South Londoner. Don't care if they are part of a coven or worship the Goddess Annoia (the Goddess of Things That get Stuck in Drawers). If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidae on our hands. Very interesting. I have Normans in my ancestry among others so does that mean I'm not entirely English? This stuff is not really relevant. What is relevant is what you consider yourself to be, who you align yourself with and who other people consider you to be. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (17 May 2016 1.46pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 17 May 16 2.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
What a load of crap. 'The rest are born in England, that makes them English'.....really a total load of BS. Sorry mate but you don't get to define what an individual feels what their identity is. You know...that's kind of what a census is....You get to put down your identity....not what your passport says. Now if Mo feels he is English that's fine with me but don't give me that crap about diversity being what British is.....Firstly I was talking about the English in London and secondly you don't get to define what British is either. Each British...or in the case of what I was talking about English person gets to define that for themselves not for anyone else. Edited by Stirlingsays (16 May 2016 9.59pm) I wonder what people like Punch, Zaha, Kaikai or Boateng would think id they read some of these threads. It's not exactly a stretch to think some of their family might. Or are they different?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Superfly The sun always shines in Catford 17 May 16 2.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Not at all They may make very poor milkmen & be a constant worry to Mr Grimsdale but they're 100% English
Lend me a Tenor 31 May to 3 June 2017 John McIntosh Arts Centre with Superfly in the chorus |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 17 May 16 3.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Superfly
Not at all They may make very poor milkmen & be a constant worry to Mr Grimsdale but they're 100% English That post displays no Wisdom at all.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.