You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > The meeting with the premier league
November 26 2024 3.30am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The meeting with the premier league

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 8 of 12 < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

  

Sg Bilko Flag Deurne Holland 24 Apr 14 8.43am Send a Private Message to Sg Bilko Add Sg Bilko as a friend

Nothing will come of this, the FL like THE FA are usually very quick to charge in football related matters, they haven't done that, they've called the clubs to a meeting to hear both sides.

THE FA have not got involved, this shows they are not interested, anything that may or may not have taken place obviously does not contravene FA rules otherwise they would have charged Moody and/or Palace, and if it is not in contravention of FA rules then it's not in contravention of FL rules.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 24 Apr 14 9.42am

I think something will actually come out of this, but that we won't suffer unduly (at worst three points and a fine, but most likely a fine).

However I suspect to see more 'defined' FA and PL rules regarding information obtained from other clubs etc rather than the catch all good faith stuff.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
james03 Flag Bangkok 24 Apr 14 9.56am Send a Private Message to james03 Add james03 as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 24 Apr 2014 9.42am

I think something will actually come out of this, but that we won't suffer unduly (at worst three points and a fine, but most likely a fine).

However I suspect to see more 'defined' FA and PL rules regarding information obtained from other clubs etc rather than the catch all good faith stuff.

Sorry but I think you are wrong. Absolutely no points deduction and no fine. Cardiff will fail to prove that as a club we did more than any other club would and does do.

I fully expect a 'no case to answer' verdict.

 


The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made. Groucho Marx

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Bomber 1945 Flag Northampton 24 Apr 14 9.58am Send a Private Message to Bomber 1945 Add Bomber 1945 as a friend

Totally agree with that!!!


Palace supporter since Div 3 south in 1950's

Quote collier row eagle at 23 Apr 2014 11.21pm

Quote Bondy at 23 Apr 2014 11.18pm

I predict a massive zero point reduction accompanied with an enormous £0 fine


And tan to get deported.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jason7 Flag croydon 24 Apr 14 10.15am Send a Private Message to jason7 Add jason7 as a friend

If we do have 3 points deducted, then maybe wait till the end of the season and then blow a massive hole in the premiership winners glory,by claiming liverpool did the same to us on may 5.See if the men in charge dock them 3 points,and hand the title to man city/Chelsea.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
silvertop Flag Portishead 24 Apr 14 10.23am Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Quote Sg Bilko at 23 Apr 2014 5.16pm

Quote silvertop at 23 Apr 2014 3.52pm

Quote Sg Bilko at 23 Apr 2014 3.42pm

Quote jiepandy at 23 Apr 2014 2.45pm

I would have thought that Cardiff would give their side first.
Hopefully the EPL will laugh them out of the room!

I think there's every chance of that, especially when the part that only 9 of the players on the list Moody obtained actually played, shows their claim does not stand up.

I had Cardiff's lineup Saturday morning, it was not the lineup they fielded as Jones and Daehli, were not on it, but Bellamy and Gunnarsson were, and all assumed teams are listed on most live score APPS, even Real Madrid and Bayern Munich are on those live score APPS, even though the teams are not announced yet.


Isn't that the point. OGS claims to have had to alter the team when he heard that we had seen the list in advance.

Well that's bull squirt to start, because he(OGS) openly said Zaha would play in place of Gunnarsson who was injured so not available for selection, and Jones was played in place of Bellamy, he was put in there for his aerial strength.


Easy sport. I didn't say it was my point.

I believe this is all part of a sino-cultural face saving exercise. In other words, there is no substance whatever. Unfortunately, I can see the commission fudging it and making a decision to keep all sides happy. From my long experience in the world of litigation, that actually means both sides walking away disapointed.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
EagleRider Flag Seasalter, Kent 24 Apr 14 10.30am Send a Private Message to EagleRider Add EagleRider as a friend

Quote jason7 at 24 Apr 2014 10.15am

If we do have 3 points deducted, then maybe wait till the end of the season and then blow a massive hole in the premiership winners glory,by claiming liverpool did the same to us on may 5.See if the men in charge dock them 3 points,and hand the title to man city/Chelsea.

how can the league dock 3 points from the team that loses, mate?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Sg Bilko Flag Deurne Holland 24 Apr 14 11.19am Send a Private Message to Sg Bilko Add Sg Bilko as a friend

Quote silvertop at 24 Apr 2014 10.23am

Quote Sg Bilko at 23 Apr 2014 5.16pm

Quote silvertop at 23 Apr 2014 3.52pm

Quote Sg Bilko at 23 Apr 2014 3.42pm

Quote jiepandy at 23 Apr 2014 2.45pm

I would have thought that Cardiff would give their side first.
Hopefully the EPL will laugh them out of the room!

I think there's every chance of that, especially when the part that only 9 of the players on the list Moody obtained actually played, shows their claim does not stand up.

I had Cardiff's lineup Saturday morning, it was not the lineup they fielded as Jones and Daehli, were not on it, but Bellamy and Gunnarsson were, and all assumed teams are listed on most live score APPS, even Real Madrid and Bayern Munich are on those live score APPS, even though the teams are not announced yet.


Isn't that the point. OGS claims to have had to alter the team when he heard that we had seen the list in advance.

Well that's bull squirt to start, because he(OGS) openly said Zaha would play in place of Gunnarsson who was injured so not available for selection, and Jones was played in place of Bellamy, he was put in there for his aerial strength.


Easy sport. I didn't say it was my point.

I believe this is all part of a sino-cultural face saving exercise. In other words, there is no substance whatever. Unfortunately, I can see the commission fudging it and making a decision to keep all sides happy. From my long experience in the world of litigation, that actually means both sides walking away disapointed.

The "bull squirt" quote was towards OGS and not yourself, as he also has not covered himself with glory over this, as a coach and a professional he could and should have distanced himself from Tans tantrums.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Percy of Peckham Flag Eton Mess 24 Apr 14 11.42am Send a Private Message to Percy of Peckham Add Percy of Peckham as a friend

Surely litigation like this is all about who throws most money at the issue to get the result they desire? Fu Man Chu has got a few quid to make a fuss and line the pockets of his lawyers. Common sense will not prevail. Expect a fudge up with the outcome biased towards Mr Moneybags.

 


Denial is not just a river in Egypt!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Southampton_Eagle Flag At the after party 24 Apr 14 12.20pm Send a Private Message to Southampton_Eagle Add Southampton_Eagle as a friend

[Link]

The game won the LMA award so how seriously is this complaint going to be taken?

I stick by my opinion that we will not receive points deduction or even a fine.

Some people need to chill out.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jpegnall Flag Surrey 24 Apr 14 12.21pm Send a Private Message to jpegnall Add jpegnall as a friend

Quote Percy of Peckham at 24 Apr 2014 11.42am

Surely litigation like this is all about who throws most money at the issue to get the result they desire? Fu Man Chu has got a few quid to make a fuss and line the pockets of his lawyers. Common sense will not prevail. Expect a fudge up with the outcome biased towards Mr Moneybags.

He can line the pockets of his lawyers all day long and they can jump up and down as much as they want in return but that doesn't influence the outcome. The only time that works in litigation is when the defendant can't afford or doesn't want to risk it going to court so the litigant can extract nuisance value (i.e. get the defendant to settle). This won't work here, money won't change that. It is all about lawyers jumping up and down as instructed by angry Tan - they will have probably advised him they have a weak claim but being rich and powerful he won't listen.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Goalpost1 Flag Worcester Park 24 Apr 14 12.57pm Send a Private Message to Goalpost1 Add Goalpost1 as a friend

We might be in for a points deduction if Mr Tan targets the Premier League Headquarters with his satellite based weapons system...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 8 of 12 < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > The meeting with the premier league