You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Israel / Palestine
November 24 2024 11.52pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Israel / Palestine

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 79 of 134 < 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 >

  

Stirlingsays Flag 30 Jul 14 4.55am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 30 Jul 2014 2.33am

[Link]


Here you link to a webpage that I can only describe as anti semitic.

On this page it too claims that Israel 'created' Hamas so that it could have an unacceptable enemy to fight.

You say it only did it to sow division yet you link to a webpage that says it went far beyond that.

From Hamas's wiki page on its creation in 1970.
'Yassin and his charity were completely peaceful towards Israel during this time'.

Israel may or may not have intended to sow division.....But it is completely unproven and nonsense to suggest that Israel intended to create another enemy for itself......Which the page you have linked to states.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
matt_himself Flag Matataland 30 Jul 14 5.22am Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 11.19pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 9.23pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 9.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 8.52pm

Quote pefwin at 29 Jul 2014 8.32pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 8.20pm

Quote pefwin at 29 Jul 2014 7.51pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 7.36pm

Quote pefwin at 29 Jul 2014 7.32pm

Quote ghosteagle at 29 Jul 2014 4.28pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 4.24pm

Have a look at the history of Palestine and Israel. A lot of Palestinians were happy to sell their land to Jewish settlers pre and post 1948.

The version being provided is too simplistic. This is, like the Balkans in the 1990's, a conflict we will never truly understand as we don't love there nor are really a part of it.

So, i can't have a moral opinion on the murder of children unless i've lived in the country of the murderer. Weird. Does this apply to any other crimes or just the slaughter of the innocent?


Careful Matt's believes he has been to Hebron probably in 1948, with these his views he's probably shot at some old women and children, just because they weren't Jewish.

I have really got to you, haven't I?

Yes, you have.

Anyone who is an apologist for the wiping out of a legitimate state, mass murder,or genocide really really "get my goat".

Your antithesis would be those beardy blokes that want to go to the Near East to support ISIS, who annoy me just as much. Those idiots that your politics are encouraging.


Then the above says you are a prejudiced idiot.

I have consistently said throughout these threads that my sympathies lie with the ordinary people of both sides, I believe that both their leaderships are c***s and that Israel is fact, just as much as Palestine is a fact. What I don't subscribe too is Israel bad, Palestine good. The situation is too complex for that easy analogy.

Good to see that this thread has changed your opinion, nobody is right or wrong, nor is blame an exercise in equality, nor condoning asymmetrical war ethical or pretty; however your grasp of Operation Protective edge is minimal.

Perhaps if you have one of your visits to Hebron, you may be close to Gaza enough that you may get an update to give you an update.

Don't try and pat yourself on the back. I have been consistent throughout these threads. These threads wouldn't change my mind because people like yourself and Gusset are so quick to label Israel and Israelis as bad.

Keep digging about me. It is pisspoor and as intellectually bankrupt as Gusset's 'blah blah blah, you want to see people suffer don't you' posts.

You haven't been consistent matt. As for your charge of me saying Israelis are bad. You are wrong. I have said I am against the right wing Israeli government, as I have also said I deplore Hamas. Get your facts right before dishing out insults.
Now kindly leave me alone and debate the facts and opinions before slating individuals, it contravenes this site's guidelines and puts you in danger of being seen as odious, which I'm sure you are not.


Give it up Gusset. You have labelled me everything from a cryto facist to a war mongering b******. You have told me to f*** off, a few times, on here. I have never sworn at you. Be careful before you start accusing others of contravening rules on here because I have been very respectful of others and never resorted to the base level others have.

The fact that you don't like being questionned you is your problem. I can take any questioning and encourage it. I have the hide of a rhino. That is to me, part of being an active member of a message board. If you can't take it, don't give it.

You are right now coming over as self righteous and appearing to put yourself in a category where you cannot be questioned. That ain't on.


Far from it. I don't mind being questioned. However you go beyond this. Your paranoia of the 'left' is laughable. As I have stated many times in this thread, Hamas and Netanyahu's lot are both culpable, yet you continue to say I haven't said this, followed up with base insults. I apologise for telling you to fack off. Now, like you I am thick skinned, however your sniping posting style shows your true colours and makes this message board both boring and even unpleasant for some.

Edited by nickgusset (30 Jul 2014 1.59am)

This is all part of your point scoring game.

The above actually made me laugh, given your behaviour and your labelling of people who disagree with you.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 30 Jul 14 9.32am

Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jul 2014 4.55am

Quote nickgusset at 30 Jul 2014 2.33am

[Link]


Here you link to a webpage that I can only describe as anti semitic.

On this page it too claims that Israel 'created' Hamas so that it could have an unacceptable enemy to fight.

You say it only did it to sow division yet you link to a webpage that says it went far beyond that.

From Hamas's wiki page on its creation in 1970.
'Yassin and his charity were completely peaceful towards Israel during this time'.

Israel may or may not have intended to sow division.....But it is completely unproven and nonsense to suggest that Israel intended to create another enemy for itself......Which the page you have linked to states.


The Israeli government "encouraged" and "used " HAMAS, yes, of that there seems little doubt. To weaken Fatah and "divide and rule" in the occupied territories and to reduce political pressure for a feasible two state solution. HAMAS was happy to be used in the short -term to increase its own strength, "used" Israel for its own ends, and has arguably come out "ahead" in the longer "game". History is littered with unlikely bedfellows being "supportive" to prepare on both sides (as each sees it) better for the end game (viz Nazi-Soviet pact 1939-41).

But, as with so much short-term thinking, the genie has come out of the bottle and bit them back. Just the same as "us" re jihadists in Afghanistan in the late 70's/early 80's against the Soviet Union, "us" encouraging various jihadi groups to use London as a base in the 80's/90's,and in a contemporary context, just like us with groups like ISIS in Syria.

No more, no less.

Edited by legaleagle (30 Jul 2014 9.33am)

Edited by legaleagle (30 Jul 2014 9.34am)

Edited by legaleagle (30 Jul 2014 9.47am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 30 Jul 14 10.18am

Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jul 2014 4.55am

Quote nickgusset at 30 Jul 2014 2.33am

[Link]


Here you link to a webpage that I can only describe as anti semitic.

On this page it too claims that Israel 'created' Hamas so that it could have an unacceptable enemy to fight.

You say it only did it to sow division yet you link to a webpage that says it went far beyond that.

From Hamas's wiki page on its creation in 1970.
'Yassin and his charity were completely peaceful towards Israel during this time'.

Israel may or may not have intended to sow division.....But it is completely unproven and nonsense to suggest that Israel intended to create another enemy for itself......Which the page you have linked to states.

It's not anti semitic. It's written by a jew and discusses why it isn't anti semitic.
I think what's interesting is that it states that Hamas leaders who have striven for peace have been bumped off...

The perpetuation of war is very Orwell Ian don't you think?


Edited by nickgusset (30 Jul 2014 10.19am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 30 Jul 14 10.48am Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 30 Jul 2014 10.18am

Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jul 2014 4.55am

Quote nickgusset at 30 Jul 2014 2.33am

[Link]


Here you link to a webpage that I can only describe as anti semitic.

On this page it too claims that Israel 'created' Hamas so that it could have an unacceptable enemy to fight.

You say it only did it to sow division yet you link to a webpage that says it went far beyond that.

From Hamas's wiki page on its creation in 1970.
'Yassin and his charity were completely peaceful towards Israel during this time'.

Israel may or may not have intended to sow division.....But it is completely unproven and nonsense to suggest that Israel intended to create another enemy for itself......Which the page you have linked to states.

It's not anti semitic. It's written by a jew and discusses why it isn't anti semitic.
I think what's interesting is that it states that Hamas leaders who have striven for peace have been bumped off...

The perpetuation of war is very Orwell Ian don't you think?


Edited by nickgusset (30 Jul 2014 10.19am)


Going by the media and even on here it appears that the Israeli apologists/turning a blind eye types are getting fewer by the day. They, at last, are being forced to wake up to an unpalatable and brutal reality which has been going on for many years and which they thought was the preserve of only the do-gooding left to be concerned about which, by default, had meant tacit support from them for Likud's belligerence.

Hopefully, the slaughter and destruction in Gaza by Israel - this time started remember after the murder of those three teenagers NOT by Hamas and not even in or close to Gaza- has woken them from their apathy and they are now rightfully questioning Israel's real motives in the whole mess over the last 18 years since the election after Rabin's assassination.

I remember at the time just before his murder Israel was split roughly 50/50 for the pursuit of peace and a two-state solution.

A few days ago it was reported that nearly 90 per cent support what is happening in Gaza.

That's a massive shift and could help to explain how the government is able to operate now with impunity.

Has Israeli society become more inward looking? Enough to give the thumbs-up to the mass slaughter of children every few years?

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 30 Jul 14 11.00am

Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jul 2014 4.55am

Quote nickgusset at 30 Jul 2014 2.33am

[Link]


Here you link to a webpage that I can only describe as anti semitic.

On this page it too claims that Israel 'created' Hamas so that it could have an unacceptable enemy to fight.

You say it only did it to sow division yet you link to a webpage that says it went far beyond that.

From Hamas's wiki page on its creation in 1970.
'Yassin and his charity were completely peaceful towards Israel during this time'.

Israel may or may not have intended to sow division.....But it is completely unproven and nonsense to suggest that Israel intended to create another enemy for itself......Which the page you have linked to states.

Israel did encourage and support a fledgling Hamas back in its early days, as it undermined Fatah and the PLO. I don't think it was as deliberate as creating an enemy that was justifiable, but about breaking the power that Fatah, PLO and PFLP held over Gaza and the West Bank.

Ironically Hamas isn't an unacceptable enemy, as the PA works quite closely with the Israeli security. Its fact that the PA has no real capacity to enforce its authority on groups such as the Military wing of Hamas and the assorted spliter cells and factions operating in Palestine and the occupied territories.

Most people fail to realise that Hamas also provides about 60-75% of the welfare, education and housing support to Palestinians.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 30 Jul 14 11.24am Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Yep - 80% per cent of Gazans rely on aid to survive since the blockade started 7 years ago. Hamas may not be everyone's cup of tea but if they are helping to feed, healthcheck and school your child then you will be thankful even if you abhor what they stand for.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
serial thriller Flag The Promised Land 30 Jul 14 11.31am Send a Private Message to serial thriller Add serial thriller as a friend

Shady Israeli propaganda initiative #2319: [Link]

I feel like throughout this thread those of us who are siding with the Palestinians have been on the defensive. Arguments tend to go something like:

Nick: "Look at this awful thing Israel are doing"
Matt: "Shut up you lefty Guardianista, I suppose you support Hamas then"
Nick: "No, I dislike Hamas but the crimes Israel are committing are far worse"
Matt: "You basically don't care about innocent Israelis, try going there and leaving the comfort of your own bubble, like I once did"

So I'd like to go on the offensive, with two simple questions...

1) If we are in agreement that there are terrible atrocities being committed by both sides, why is it that the West still supports Israel, both in terms of arms, finance and politics, and how can this be justified?

2) It's easy to call for Hamas to destroy tunnels and their rockets, but this is equivalent to calling for Israel to destroy their iron dome, entire military facility, nuclear weapons programme, end arms ties with the US and end the blockade etc etc. because you are in effect asking a nation at war to totally sever its military capabilities. What would you say a reasonable compromise for the Israelis would be were Hamas/Fatah to agree to what Israel's demands?

 


If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 30 Jul 14 11.33am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Jul 2014 11.00am

Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jul 2014 4.55am

Quote nickgusset at 30 Jul 2014 2.33am

[Link]


Here you link to a webpage that I can only describe as anti semitic.

On this page it too claims that Israel 'created' Hamas so that it could have an unacceptable enemy to fight.

You say it only did it to sow division yet you link to a webpage that says it went far beyond that.

From Hamas's wiki page on its creation in 1970.
'Yassin and his charity were completely peaceful towards Israel during this time'.

Israel may or may not have intended to sow division.....But it is completely unproven and nonsense to suggest that Israel intended to create another enemy for itself......Which the page you have linked to states.

Israel did encourage and support a fledgling Hamas back in its early days, as it undermined Fatah and the PLO. I don't think it was as deliberate as creating an enemy that was justifiable, but about breaking the power that Fatah, PLO and PFLP held over Gaza and the West Bank.

Ironically Hamas isn't an unacceptable enemy, as the PA works quite closely with the Israeli security. Its fact that the PA has no real capacity to enforce its authority on groups such as the Military wing of Hamas and the assorted spliter cells and factions operating in Palestine and the occupied territories.

Most people fail to realise that Hamas also provides about 60-75% of the welfare, education and housing support to Palestinians.


Of course the non charity aspects of Hamas are unacceptable. It is labelled a terrorist group by most democracies as far as I'm aware.

Its constitution is akin to a Nazi one in regards to Jews.

Some of the right in Israel may regard Hamas as an excuse but most are right to see it for what it is.....An organization that if it had the means is an existential threat to their existence.


Edited by Stirlingsays (30 Jul 2014 12.02pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 30 Jul 14 11.42am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote Kermit8 at 30 Jul 2014 11.24am

Yep - 80% per cent of Gazans rely on aid to survive since the blockade started 7 years ago. Hamas may not be everyone's cup of tea but if they are helping to feed, healthcheck and school your child then you will be thankful even if you abhor what they stand for.


In a war there is a dehumanization process that occurs. The rocket fire enables Israeli citizens in general have far less sympathy than would be normal.

It is a fear and fight response that is typical of human nature and an easy example can be seen in the general support for civilian bombing campaigns by both the German and British peoples during the second world war.

Hamas declares continual war on Israel with ceasefires/truces only intended as strategy. This gives Israel the right to attack it.....Just not in the fashion it currently is using.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 30 Jul 14 11.44am Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

If there's a blockade on Gaza, how are they getting the missiles they're firing at Israel?

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 30 Jul 14 11.50am Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Another UN School shelter hit by Israel today with 3,000 in the compound

Move over Mladic and Karadzic you blockading, siege- enforcing murdering b@stards. Oh,...wait. My mistake. Not necessary.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 79 of 134 < 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Israel / Palestine