This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 30 Jul 14 4.55am | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 30 Jul 2014 2.33am
On this page it too claims that Israel 'created' Hamas so that it could have an unacceptable enemy to fight. You say it only did it to sow division yet you link to a webpage that says it went far beyond that. From Hamas's wiki page on its creation in 1970. Israel may or may not have intended to sow division.....But it is completely unproven and nonsense to suggest that Israel intended to create another enemy for itself......Which the page you have linked to states.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 30 Jul 14 5.22am | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 11.19pm
Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 9.23pm
Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 9.13pm
Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 8.52pm
Quote pefwin at 29 Jul 2014 8.32pm
Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 8.20pm
Quote pefwin at 29 Jul 2014 7.51pm
Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 7.36pm
Quote pefwin at 29 Jul 2014 7.32pm
Quote ghosteagle at 29 Jul 2014 4.28pm
Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 4.24pm
Have a look at the history of Palestine and Israel. A lot of Palestinians were happy to sell their land to Jewish settlers pre and post 1948. The version being provided is too simplistic. This is, like the Balkans in the 1990's, a conflict we will never truly understand as we don't love there nor are really a part of it. So, i can't have a moral opinion on the murder of children unless i've lived in the country of the murderer. Weird. Does this apply to any other crimes or just the slaughter of the innocent?
I have really got to you, haven't I? Yes, you have. Anyone who is an apologist for the wiping out of a legitimate state, mass murder,or genocide really really "get my goat". Your antithesis would be those beardy blokes that want to go to the Near East to support ISIS, who annoy me just as much. Those idiots that your politics are encouraging.
I have consistently said throughout these threads that my sympathies lie with the ordinary people of both sides, I believe that both their leaderships are c***s and that Israel is fact, just as much as Palestine is a fact. What I don't subscribe too is Israel bad, Palestine good. The situation is too complex for that easy analogy. Good to see that this thread has changed your opinion, nobody is right or wrong, nor is blame an exercise in equality, nor condoning asymmetrical war ethical or pretty; however your grasp of Operation Protective edge is minimal. Perhaps if you have one of your visits to Hebron, you may be close to Gaza enough that you may get an update to give you an update. Don't try and pat yourself on the back. I have been consistent throughout these threads. These threads wouldn't change my mind because people like yourself and Gusset are so quick to label Israel and Israelis as bad. Keep digging about me. It is pisspoor and as intellectually bankrupt as Gusset's 'blah blah blah, you want to see people suffer don't you' posts. You haven't been consistent matt. As for your charge of me saying Israelis are bad. You are wrong. I have said I am against the right wing Israeli government, as I have also said I deplore Hamas. Get your facts right before dishing out insults.
The fact that you don't like being questionned you is your problem. I can take any questioning and encourage it. I have the hide of a rhino. That is to me, part of being an active member of a message board. If you can't take it, don't give it. You are right now coming over as self righteous and appearing to put yourself in a category where you cannot be questioned. That ain't on.
Edited by nickgusset (30 Jul 2014 1.59am) This is all part of your point scoring game. The above actually made me laugh, given your behaviour and your labelling of people who disagree with you.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 30 Jul 14 9.32am | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jul 2014 4.55am
Quote nickgusset at 30 Jul 2014 2.33am
On this page it too claims that Israel 'created' Hamas so that it could have an unacceptable enemy to fight. You say it only did it to sow division yet you link to a webpage that says it went far beyond that. From Hamas's wiki page on its creation in 1970. Israel may or may not have intended to sow division.....But it is completely unproven and nonsense to suggest that Israel intended to create another enemy for itself......Which the page you have linked to states.
But, as with so much short-term thinking, the genie has come out of the bottle and bit them back. Just the same as "us" re jihadists in Afghanistan in the late 70's/early 80's against the Soviet Union, "us" encouraging various jihadi groups to use London as a base in the 80's/90's,and in a contemporary context, just like us with groups like ISIS in Syria. No more, no less.
Edited by legaleagle (30 Jul 2014 9.33am) Edited by legaleagle (30 Jul 2014 9.34am) Edited by legaleagle (30 Jul 2014 9.47am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 30 Jul 14 10.18am | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jul 2014 4.55am
Quote nickgusset at 30 Jul 2014 2.33am
On this page it too claims that Israel 'created' Hamas so that it could have an unacceptable enemy to fight. You say it only did it to sow division yet you link to a webpage that says it went far beyond that. From Hamas's wiki page on its creation in 1970. Israel may or may not have intended to sow division.....But it is completely unproven and nonsense to suggest that Israel intended to create another enemy for itself......Which the page you have linked to states. It's not anti semitic. It's written by a jew and discusses why it isn't anti semitic. The perpetuation of war is very Orwell Ian don't you think?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 30 Jul 14 10.48am | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 30 Jul 2014 10.18am
Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jul 2014 4.55am
Quote nickgusset at 30 Jul 2014 2.33am
On this page it too claims that Israel 'created' Hamas so that it could have an unacceptable enemy to fight. You say it only did it to sow division yet you link to a webpage that says it went far beyond that. From Hamas's wiki page on its creation in 1970. Israel may or may not have intended to sow division.....But it is completely unproven and nonsense to suggest that Israel intended to create another enemy for itself......Which the page you have linked to states. It's not anti semitic. It's written by a jew and discusses why it isn't anti semitic. The perpetuation of war is very Orwell Ian don't you think?
Hopefully, the slaughter and destruction in Gaza by Israel - this time started remember after the murder of those three teenagers NOT by Hamas and not even in or close to Gaza- has woken them from their apathy and they are now rightfully questioning Israel's real motives in the whole mess over the last 18 years since the election after Rabin's assassination. I remember at the time just before his murder Israel was split roughly 50/50 for the pursuit of peace and a two-state solution. A few days ago it was reported that nearly 90 per cent support what is happening in Gaza. That's a massive shift and could help to explain how the government is able to operate now with impunity. Has Israeli society become more inward looking? Enough to give the thumbs-up to the mass slaughter of children every few years?
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 30 Jul 14 11.00am | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jul 2014 4.55am
Quote nickgusset at 30 Jul 2014 2.33am
On this page it too claims that Israel 'created' Hamas so that it could have an unacceptable enemy to fight. You say it only did it to sow division yet you link to a webpage that says it went far beyond that. From Hamas's wiki page on its creation in 1970. Israel may or may not have intended to sow division.....But it is completely unproven and nonsense to suggest that Israel intended to create another enemy for itself......Which the page you have linked to states. Israel did encourage and support a fledgling Hamas back in its early days, as it undermined Fatah and the PLO. I don't think it was as deliberate as creating an enemy that was justifiable, but about breaking the power that Fatah, PLO and PFLP held over Gaza and the West Bank. Ironically Hamas isn't an unacceptable enemy, as the PA works quite closely with the Israeli security. Its fact that the PA has no real capacity to enforce its authority on groups such as the Military wing of Hamas and the assorted spliter cells and factions operating in Palestine and the occupied territories. Most people fail to realise that Hamas also provides about 60-75% of the welfare, education and housing support to Palestinians.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 30 Jul 14 11.24am | |
---|---|
Yep - 80% per cent of Gazans rely on aid to survive since the blockade started 7 years ago. Hamas may not be everyone's cup of tea but if they are helping to feed, healthcheck and school your child then you will be thankful even if you abhor what they stand for.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
serial thriller The Promised Land 30 Jul 14 11.31am | |
---|---|
Shady Israeli propaganda initiative #2319: [Link] I feel like throughout this thread those of us who are siding with the Palestinians have been on the defensive. Arguments tend to go something like: Nick: "Look at this awful thing Israel are doing" So I'd like to go on the offensive, with two simple questions... 1) If we are in agreement that there are terrible atrocities being committed by both sides, why is it that the West still supports Israel, both in terms of arms, finance and politics, and how can this be justified? 2) It's easy to call for Hamas to destroy tunnels and their rockets, but this is equivalent to calling for Israel to destroy their iron dome, entire military facility, nuclear weapons programme, end arms ties with the US and end the blockade etc etc. because you are in effect asking a nation at war to totally sever its military capabilities. What would you say a reasonable compromise for the Israelis would be were Hamas/Fatah to agree to what Israel's demands?
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 30 Jul 14 11.33am | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Jul 2014 11.00am
Quote Stirlingsays at 30 Jul 2014 4.55am
Quote nickgusset at 30 Jul 2014 2.33am
On this page it too claims that Israel 'created' Hamas so that it could have an unacceptable enemy to fight. You say it only did it to sow division yet you link to a webpage that says it went far beyond that. From Hamas's wiki page on its creation in 1970. Israel may or may not have intended to sow division.....But it is completely unproven and nonsense to suggest that Israel intended to create another enemy for itself......Which the page you have linked to states. Israel did encourage and support a fledgling Hamas back in its early days, as it undermined Fatah and the PLO. I don't think it was as deliberate as creating an enemy that was justifiable, but about breaking the power that Fatah, PLO and PFLP held over Gaza and the West Bank. Ironically Hamas isn't an unacceptable enemy, as the PA works quite closely with the Israeli security. Its fact that the PA has no real capacity to enforce its authority on groups such as the Military wing of Hamas and the assorted spliter cells and factions operating in Palestine and the occupied territories. Most people fail to realise that Hamas also provides about 60-75% of the welfare, education and housing support to Palestinians.
Its constitution is akin to a Nazi one in regards to Jews. Some of the right in Israel may regard Hamas as an excuse but most are right to see it for what it is.....An organization that if it had the means is an existential threat to their existence.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 30 Jul 14 11.42am | |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 30 Jul 2014 11.24am
Yep - 80% per cent of Gazans rely on aid to survive since the blockade started 7 years ago. Hamas may not be everyone's cup of tea but if they are helping to feed, healthcheck and school your child then you will be thankful even if you abhor what they stand for.
It is a fear and fight response that is typical of human nature and an easy example can be seen in the general support for civilian bombing campaigns by both the German and British peoples during the second world war. Hamas declares continual war on Israel with ceasefires/truces only intended as strategy. This gives Israel the right to attack it.....Just not in the fashion it currently is using.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 30 Jul 14 11.44am | |
---|---|
If there's a blockade on Gaza, how are they getting the missiles they're firing at Israel?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 30 Jul 14 11.50am | |
---|---|
Another UN School shelter hit by Israel today with 3,000 in the compound Move over Mladic and Karadzic you blockading, siege- enforcing murdering b@stards. Oh,...wait. My mistake. Not necessary.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.