This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 22 Sep 15 10.12am | |
---|---|
Quote jcreedy at 21 Sep 2015 3.38pm
More 'fit to work' joy today.
I have been on the receiving end of living with someone who had severe depression and to blame any one trigger shows a complete lack of any understanding of the decease. And how the Government are to blame is a f***ing reach even by JC (same initials as Jeremy Corbyn ..just saying) standards. The department of Work and Pensions made the decision not Cameron so it is a departmental issue and an individual error was clearly made sweet FA to do with politics or Corbyn. How that’s pig f***ers fault is beyond me, like I said lazy socialist bollicks.
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 22 Sep 15 10.22am | |
---|---|
Quote dannyh at 22 Sep 2015 10.12am
Quote jcreedy at 21 Sep 2015 3.38pm
More 'fit to work' joy today.
I have been on the receiving end of living with someone who had severe depression and to blame any one trigger shows a complete lack of any understanding of the decease. And how the Government are to blame is a f***ing reach even by JC (same initials as Jeremy Corbyn ..just saying) standards. The department of Work and Pensions made the decision not Cameron so it is a departmental issue and an individual error was clearly made sweet FA to do with politics or Corbyn. How that’s pig f***ers fault is beyond me, like I said lazy socialist bollicks.
Coroners have more "licence" than Judges in applying the law and arriving at outcomes of death and some Coroners have sparked controversy in the past as they are largely unchecked in my experience.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 22 Sep 15 10.31am | |
---|---|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 21 Sep 2015 9.51am
Quote OldFella at 21 Sep 2015 9.44am
Quote davenotamonkey at 21 Sep 2015 12.37am
Quote serial thriller at 20 Sep 2015 11.11pm
But then it's pretty foolish to start judging Corbyn based on conventional political standards, as has been shown time and time again in the past 4 months. Here's a man who was given the biggest mandate in British political history to lead his party, having been almost universally written off as a no hoper. He's potentially going to lead the Labour party to 1 million members by 2020 in an age where the Tories are struggling to get in to 6 figures, and we have a self-professed communist as shadow chancellor. The past 10 weeks have thrown up more surprises in British politics, arguably, than had occurred in the previous 10 years. God knows what's going to happen in the next 4 1/2 years leading up to the election. It's so sweet you actually believe that. Labour membership? Sure, why not. I can vote for an IRA-loving communist and stop Labour from getting into power for as long as this guy leads? Awesome! How much? £3?! I'll take 3! 83.3% of the £3 voters voted for.... Corbyn, the rest of the party went along for the ride to stick their collective fingers up at the Bl*ir and Burnham's of the party, likely egged on and socialmedialobotomised (as let's be frank, Tw@tter et al. are rammed full of this lot) by a combination of useful idiots (Owen Jones) and genuine false-flag operations. And it's worked perfectly. Enjoy. Post of the month - spot on.
Try asking someone under 30 what they think. Loads of the people that backed Corbyn are da yoof. Somewhat bizarre really given he comes from a by-gone era. Not many of you old duffers actually got their act together to join up just to put in a spoiling vote. But of course, you wouldn't know that if you only read the Daily Mail/Telegraph/Metro/Evening Standard.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 22 Sep 15 10.33am | |
---|---|
Quote Mapletree at 22 Sep 2015 10.31am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 21 Sep 2015 9.51am
Quote OldFella at 21 Sep 2015 9.44am
Quote davenotamonkey at 21 Sep 2015 12.37am
Quote serial thriller at 20 Sep 2015 11.11pm
But then it's pretty foolish to start judging Corbyn based on conventional political standards, as has been shown time and time again in the past 4 months. Here's a man who was given the biggest mandate in British political history to lead his party, having been almost universally written off as a no hoper. He's potentially going to lead the Labour party to 1 million members by 2020 in an age where the Tories are struggling to get in to 6 figures, and we have a self-professed communist as shadow chancellor. The past 10 weeks have thrown up more surprises in British politics, arguably, than had occurred in the previous 10 years. God knows what's going to happen in the next 4 1/2 years leading up to the election. It's so sweet you actually believe that. Labour membership? Sure, why not. I can vote for an IRA-loving communist and stop Labour from getting into power for as long as this guy leads? Awesome! How much? £3?! I'll take 3! 83.3% of the £3 voters voted for.... Corbyn, the rest of the party went along for the ride to stick their collective fingers up at the Bl*ir and Burnham's of the party, likely egged on and socialmedialobotomised (as let's be frank, Tw@tter et al. are rammed full of this lot) by a combination of useful idiots (Owen Jones) and genuine false-flag operations. And it's worked perfectly. Enjoy. Post of the month - spot on.
Try asking someone under 30 what they think. Loads of the people that backed Corbyn are da yoof. Somewhat bizarre really given he comes from a by-gone era. Not many of you old duffers actually got their act together to join up just to put in a spoiling vote. But of course, you wouldn't know that if you only read the Daily Mail/Telegraph/Metro/Evening Standard.
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
npn Crowborough 22 Sep 15 10.34am | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 21 Sep 2015 11.05pm
As Corbyn has made renationalisation of the railways a priority, I thought I'd share this prescient clip from an old spitting image.
Not necessarily disagreeing, just haven't yet seen a "nationalising the railways will improve things because we will..." argument laying out the proposed causes and effects.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 22 Sep 15 10.43am | |
---|---|
Quote npn at 22 Sep 2015 10.34am
Quote nickgusset at 21 Sep 2015 11.05pm
As Corbyn has made renationalisation of the railways a priority, I thought I'd share this prescient clip from an old spitting image.
Not necessarily disagreeing, just haven't yet seen a "nationalising the railways will improve things because we will..." argument laying out the proposed causes and effects.
Trains were a bit crap before nationalisation and a a bit crap after. The difference is one had reasonable prices and was not driven by profit and the other is mostly about the filthy lucre and not so much a public service.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 22 Sep 15 10.57am | |
---|---|
Quote dannyh at 22 Sep 2015 10.12am
Quote jcreedy at 21 Sep 2015 3.38pm
More 'fit to work' joy today.
I have been on the receiving end of living with someone who had severe depression and to blame any one trigger shows a complete lack of any understanding of the decease. And how the Government are to blame is a f***ing reach even by JC (same initials as Jeremy Corbyn ..just saying) standards. The department of Work and Pensions made the decision not Cameron so it is a departmental issue and an individual error was clearly made sweet FA to do with politics or Corbyn. How that’s pig f***ers fault is beyond me, like I said lazy socialist bollicks.
Depends - If the coroners verdict is that it played a significant role, then its a factor. But I tend to agree with you, having suffered with clinical depression my whole adult life, that its not a factor of one thing, or even one huge thing, but a collection of the smaller things in life. But a coroners inquest is to establish the facts of the case. And the decision of a government body should never override the decision of a qualified medical professional, when dealing with someone's individual case. of course, this is a problem initiated by Labour, with the ATOS Fit for Work program, in which incentives were based on 'positive results', the actual number of successful appeals under this scheme pretty much suggests its a total failure. But it has long suited governments to look like they're doing something, rather than say actually doing something (such as actual spending on mental health provision in the UK).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 22 Sep 15 11.02am | |
---|---|
Quote npn at 22 Sep 2015 10.34am
Quote nickgusset at 21 Sep 2015 11.05pm
As Corbyn has made renationalisation of the railways a priority, I thought I'd share this prescient clip from an old spitting image.
Not necessarily disagreeing, just haven't yet seen a "nationalising the railways will improve things because we will..." argument laying out the proposed causes and effects. Presumably that will be outlined in the manifesto for the election. Its a bit early in the term to be talking about exact details and hashing out the fine print. Personally I'd nationalize the railways, if I could, without compensation to the shareholders, as its a f**king disgrace. I don't object to profit and people making a profit, but the question should be who does the countries rail network serve, the owners or the individuals who use it (including commuting to and from work). Something like public transport may need to actually run at a loss anyhow, if by doing so you can facilitate employment and tax return improvements elsewhere.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
OldFella London 22 Sep 15 11.11am | |
---|---|
Quote Mapletree at 22 Sep 2015 10.31am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 21 Sep 2015 9.51am
Quote OldFella at 21 Sep 2015 9.44am
Quote davenotamonkey at 21 Sep 2015 12.37am
Quote serial thriller at 20 Sep 2015 11.11pm
But then it's pretty foolish to start judging Corbyn based on conventional political standards, as has been shown time and time again in the past 4 months. Here's a man who was given the biggest mandate in British political history to lead his party, having been almost universally written off as a no hoper. He's potentially going to lead the Labour party to 1 million members by 2020 in an age where the Tories are struggling to get in to 6 figures, and we have a self-professed communist as shadow chancellor. The past 10 weeks have thrown up more surprises in British politics, arguably, than had occurred in the previous 10 years. God knows what's going to happen in the next 4 1/2 years leading up to the election. It's so sweet you actually believe that. Labour membership? Sure, why not. I can vote for an IRA-loving communist and stop Labour from getting into power for as long as this guy leads? Awesome! How much? £3?! I'll take 3! 83.3% of the £3 voters voted for.... Corbyn, the rest of the party went along for the ride to stick their collective fingers up at the Bl*ir and Burnham's of the party, likely egged on and socialmedialobotomised (as let's be frank, Tw@tter et al. are rammed full of this lot) by a combination of useful idiots (Owen Jones) and genuine false-flag operations. And it's worked perfectly. Enjoy. Post of the month - spot on.
Try asking someone under 30 what they think. Loads of the people that backed Corbyn are da yoof. Somewhat bizarre really given he comes from a by-gone era. Not many of you old duffers actually got their act together to join up just to put in a spoiling vote. But of course, you wouldn't know that if you only read the Daily Mail/Telegraph/Metro/Evening Standard. Left wing wally talking to himself again alert...
Jackson.. Wan Bissaka.... Sansom.. Nicholas.. Cannon.. Guehi.... Zaha... Thomas.. Byrne... Holton.. Rogers.. that should do it.. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 22 Sep 15 11.17am | |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 22 Sep 2015 10.43am
Quote npn at 22 Sep 2015 10.34am
Quote nickgusset at 21 Sep 2015 11.05pm
As Corbyn has made renationalisation of the railways a priority, I thought I'd share this prescient clip from an old spitting image.
Not necessarily disagreeing, just haven't yet seen a "nationalising the railways will improve things because we will..." argument laying out the proposed causes and effects.
Trains were a bit crap before nationalisation and a a bit crap after. The difference is one had reasonable prices and was not driven by profit and the other is mostly about the filthy lucre and not so much a public service. Exeter to Manchester return is usually under a 100 quid if booked in advance. I was working there in Feb and the return from Caterham was 85 including tube.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 22 Sep 15 11.21am | |
---|---|
Quote Mapletree at 22 Sep 2015 10.31am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 21 Sep 2015 9.51am
Quote OldFella at 21 Sep 2015 9.44am
Quote davenotamonkey at 21 Sep 2015 12.37am
Quote serial thriller at 20 Sep 2015 11.11pm
But then it's pretty foolish to start judging Corbyn based on conventional political standards, as has been shown time and time again in the past 4 months. Here's a man who was given the biggest mandate in British political history to lead his party, having been almost universally written off as a no hoper. He's potentially going to lead the Labour party to 1 million members by 2020 in an age where the Tories are struggling to get in to 6 figures, and we have a self-professed communist as shadow chancellor. The past 10 weeks have thrown up more surprises in British politics, arguably, than had occurred in the previous 10 years. God knows what's going to happen in the next 4 1/2 years leading up to the election. It's so sweet you actually believe that. Labour membership? Sure, why not. I can vote for an IRA-loving communist and stop Labour from getting into power for as long as this guy leads? Awesome! How much? £3?! I'll take 3! 83.3% of the £3 voters voted for.... Corbyn, the rest of the party went along for the ride to stick their collective fingers up at the Bl*ir and Burnham's of the party, likely egged on and socialmedialobotomised (as let's be frank, Tw@tter et al. are rammed full of this lot) by a combination of useful idiots (Owen Jones) and genuine false-flag operations. And it's worked perfectly. Enjoy. Post of the month - spot on.
Try asking someone under 30 what they think. Loads of the people that backed Corbyn are da yoof. Somewhat bizarre really given he comes from a by-gone era. Not many of you old duffers actually got their act together to join up just to put in a spoiling vote. But of course, you wouldn't know that if you only read the Daily Mail/Telegraph/Metro/Evening Standard.
There are plenty of 'old duffers' that voted for him and hang on his every word. Leave it to Bert the Nobhead from Epsom to educate us tirelessly about the evils of the right wing press... I don't take a newspaper, none of my friends or family do either... maybe we just don't like what we see and hear on BBC TV/Radio and make our own minds up? As for paying £3 to the Labour Party.... not a chance... that would get me 12 strawberry cornetto's in Sainsbury's.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 22 Sep 15 11.24am | |
---|---|
Quote chris123 at 22 Sep 2015 11.17am
Quote Kermit8 at 22 Sep 2015 10.43am
Quote npn at 22 Sep 2015 10.34am
Quote nickgusset at 21 Sep 2015 11.05pm
As Corbyn has made renationalisation of the railways a priority, I thought I'd share this prescient clip from an old spitting image.
Not necessarily disagreeing, just haven't yet seen a "nationalising the railways will improve things because we will..." argument laying out the proposed causes and effects.
Trains were a bit crap before nationalisation and a a bit crap after. The difference is one had reasonable prices and was not driven by profit and the other is mostly about the filthy lucre and not so much a public service. Exeter to Manchester return is usually under a 100 quid if booked in advance. I was working there in Feb and the return from Caterham was 85 including tube.
The £400 one did make me laugh though. How do they have the gall?
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.