You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Coutts VS Nigel Farage
November 21 2024 12.42pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Coutts VS Nigel Farage

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 76 of 80 < 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 >

  

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 08 Aug 23 11.26am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by NEILLO

I don’t need to re-read.

If I deem something as costing too much / more than it’s worth then in my book that’s expensive. You’re splitting hairs, I assume because you have found to be totally incorrect and uninformed about how PEP accounts are monitored.

We established quite some time ago now that Coutts had the right to make their decision. Continued repetition of that is superfluous

You may think that accuracy is “splitting hairs”. I don’t. Expensive simply means costing a lot. Costing more than it’s worth is about value.

You have provided interesting and undoubtedly accurate information about the way PEP accounts were handled within your own experience. Whether true of this event is unknown. All of which is a sideshow.

Repetition of the fact that this was always Coutts decision to make, thus making all the indignation and outrage rather pointless, certainly ought to be unnecessary.

Unfortunately when others continue to post the indignation and outrage, it isn’t.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 08 Aug 23 12.07pm Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

Originally posted by NEILLO

I don’t need to re-read.

If I deem something as costing too much / more than it’s worth then in my book that’s expensive. You’re splitting hairs, I assume because you have found to be totally incorrect and uninformed about how PEP accounts are monitored.

We established quite some time ago now that Coutts had the right to make their decision. Continued repetition of that is superfluous

Agree

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 08 Aug 23 1.35pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend


Seems to be happening in America too.


[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 08 Aug 23 2.05pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle


Seems to be happening in America too.


[Link]

I posted this very thing but will Biden and his team want it dealt with a year before an election. Maybe it suits to have trump sponsors with no money.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 08 Aug 23 2.11pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

I posted this very thing but will Biden and his team want it dealt with a year before an election. Maybe it suits to have trump sponsors with no money.

The Democrats can then complain that Trump is getting cash from dodgy sources.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 08 Aug 23 10.52pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle


Seems to be happening in America too.


[Link]

Is this surprising?

The same considerations apply and just so long as there is no discrimination and any such decision is taken solely on that which is regarded to be in the bank’s best interests why on earth should anyone protest?

It’s their right to take such decisions. If a bank decided to drop any account held by those of a particular political persuasion then there would be legitimate questions to answer. If the reason is their view of the impact on the bank of the views of specific categories of people then there aren’t.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 08 Aug 23 11.02pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Is this surprising?

The same considerations apply and just so long as there is no discrimination and any such decision is taken solely on that which is regarded to be in the bank’s best interests why on earth should anyone protest?

It’s their right to take such decisions. If a bank decided to drop any account held by those of a particular political persuasion then there would be legitimate questions to answer. If the reason is their view of the impact on the bank of the views of specific categories of people then there aren’t.

Not surprising that the article mentions political discrimination, no.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 09 Aug 23 8.24am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Not surprising that the article mentions political discrimination, no.

No it isn’t. Discriminating between politians and those who aren’t so exposed could make sense. Discriminating between particular opinions on the sole basis of an opinion, not so.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 09 Aug 23 9.09am Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

It's not surprising to see UK banks behaving in this way.

As for the BOE, it is a root cause, with its stone-age pocket-lining economic policies, of the zero growth and investment in the UK since 2010.

Incessant interest rate rises are themselves inflationary, how could they not be, and they depress the economy forcing it into recession.

Inflation was forecast to fall to 6.5% by the end of this year before Sunak and all these tax and BOE interest hikes.

Its time to curb their excesses and bring them into line, as the new Italian government is doing.

To think they blame the very people they have damaged, wage earners, not themselves, for the UKs problems.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 09 Aug 23 9.31am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

It's not surprising to see UK banks behaving in this way.

As for the BOE, it is a root cause, with its stone-age pocket-lining economic policies, of the zero growth and investment in the UK since 2010.

Incessant interest rate rises are themselves inflationary, how could they not be, and they depress the economy forcing it into recession.

Inflation was forecast to fall to 6.5% by the end of this year before Sunak and all these tax and BOE interest hikes.

Its time to curb their excesses and bring them into line, as the new Italian government is doing.

To think they blame the very people they have damaged, wage earners, not themselves, for the UKs problems.


2 billion quid won’t go far bearing in mind our gdp is 2 trillion. Just tax the share holders is such an easy thing to do. Many have pensions invested in these banks via their providers. Never mind though as that value drops. Sod em eh!
How’s your philanthropy going ?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 09 Aug 23 9.58am Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

The BoE has been unfit for purpose for years through incompetence and multiple forecasts of growth and inflation have been wrong.

Their staff earn big numbers and seems can just bowl along doing a rubbish job without fear of consequences.

Better have a proper economist like Liam Halligan making decisions.

Edited by HKOwen (09 Aug 2023 9.58am)

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 09 Aug 23 10.09am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by HKOwen

The BoE has been unfit for purpose for years through incompetence and multiple forecasts of growth and inflation have been wrong.

Their staff earn big numbers and seems can just bowl along doing a rubbish job without fear of consequences.

Better have a proper economist like Liam Halligan making decisions.

Edited by HKOwen (09 Aug 2023 9.58am)

The Financial sector is notorious for "group think" like lemmings they all follow each other whether it's buying junk bonds leading to the 2008 crash or forecasting which the BOE and pretty most other bodies get wrong.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 76 of 80 < 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Coutts VS Nigel Farage