This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
hedgehog50 Croydon 23 Aug 17 6.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Eurozone recovering with inward investment and in particular manufacturing growth with factory closures 19% up. Pound on the slide against the euro looks now like a permanent devaluation. Investment on hold in the UK as result of brexit the Chancellor admits. Is that good?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 23 Aug 17 6.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Is that good? Yes I think steely was expecting many more closures, so clearly good news eh!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 24 Aug 17 8.21am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Haha can't believe it. The only thing left for the brexiteers is 'taking back control' now that is gone too. Be far better off staying in the EU with the power of the veto. If you'd bothered to read what was being proposed you would understand that it is an arbitration provision, not having the ECJ direct laws in Britain. I am all in favour of an arbitration provision being in place as the EU cannot be trusted in its negotiations and will find ways to try to screw us, look at the €100bn divorce bill Barnier pulled from his arse. Having an independent vehicle to settle disputes is good for the UK. Edited by matt_himself (24 Aug 2017 8.22am)
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 24 Aug 17 11.01am | |
---|---|
it is an arbitration provision, not having the ECJ direct laws in Britain. An 'arbtration position' means the UK would not be in full control of its law.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 24 Aug 17 11.17am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
it is an arbitration provision, not having the ECJ direct laws in Britain. An 'arbtration position' means the UK would not be in full control of its law. You're making up words now.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 24 Aug 17 11.56am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
it is an arbitration provision, not having the ECJ direct laws in Britain. An 'arbtration position' means the UK would not be in full control of its law. You obviously don't know what 'conflict', 'law' or 'arbitration' mean. They don't mean the ECJ adjudicating or applying laws on Britain post Brexit. You just want to believe that is the case because it suits your position.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
crystal balls The Garden of Earthly Delights 24 Aug 17 2.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by matt_himself
You obviously don't know what 'conflict', 'law' or 'arbitration' mean. They don't mean the ECJ adjudicating or applying laws on Britain post Brexit. You just want to believe that is the case because it suits your position. The ECJ have never had the position to apply laws in Britain, they mere;y advise on questions asked by British courts on European laws. This was one of many aspects of the EU that the Exit supporters misrepresented to the electorate which were false.
I used to be immortal |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
crystal balls The Garden of Earthly Delights 24 Aug 17 2.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by crystal balls
The ECJ have never had the position to apply laws in Britain, they mere;y advise on questions asked by British courts on European laws. This was one of many aspects of the EU that the Exit supporters misrepresented to the electorate which were false. However, for Sir David, it is not just May's unrealistic promises regarding the ECJ that have left him frustrated, but signs that both she and the government don't fully understand its purpose and remit. "The ECJ does not have 'direct jurisdiction' in or over the UK," the former ECJ judge tells BI.
Edited by crystal balls (24 Aug 2017 2.46pm)
I used to be immortal |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 24 Aug 17 3.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by crystal balls
The ECJ have never had the position to apply laws in Britain, they mere;y advise on questions asked by British courts on European laws. This was one of many aspects of the EU that the Exit supporters misrepresented to the electorate which were false. I didn't say the ECJ did, I was replying to Steeleye's uneducated post. Both sides misrepresented facts during the vote. Remain were just as culpable as Leave in this respect.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 24 Aug 17 3.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by matt_himself
You obviously don't know what 'conflict', 'law' or 'arbitration' mean. They don't mean the ECJ adjudicating or applying laws on Britain post Brexit. You just want to believe that is the case because it suits your position. Arbitration means the UK is not in control laws may be decided by arbitration, whoever that means not the UK or ECJ I would think. But the UK is not in charge of its own law in that case. that is what arbitration means.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 24 Aug 17 3.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Is that good? Apologies factory starts are 19% up in the EU - is it because Germany Italy France are attracting investment in preference to us because the UK is now more of a risk? No need to hold back as far as they are concerned but here is just too uncertain.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 24 Aug 17 4.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Arbitration means the UK is not in control laws may be decided by arbitration, whoever that means not the UK or ECJ I would think. But the UK is not in charge of its own law in that case. that is what arbitration means. I wonder if ACAS will get involved if negotiations stall.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.