This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Coronavirus (LOCKED)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Lombardinho  London 30 Nov 20 6.37pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chris123
Because of a truth gap. Measured by who? Can we not just talk about what he said?
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| chris123 hove actually 30 Nov 20 6.54pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Why would you pay credence to someone who has a view on Covid 19 that is not supported by their professional association?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 30 Nov 20 7.02pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
So Hancock is specifically asked “will people not be allowed to go to certain places if they don’t take the vaccine”? His reply completely and utterly ignored the question even though it was explicit. This is exactly why I do not trust this government or anyone in it, or what they tell us. The only answer you can infer from his response is that yes, you will indirectly be enforced to take it if you want to ever visit a public place again. I doubt they have given it serious thought but I'd say that your conclusion is probably correct.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Lombardinho London 30 Nov 20 7.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chris123
Why would you pay credence to someone who has a view on Covid 19 that is not supported by their professional association? In truth it's because it chimes with me.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 30 Nov 20 7.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chris123
Why would you pay credence to someone who has a view on Covid 19 that is not supported by their professional association? You remember that Darwin guy? Professional associations are fallible for various reasons and there are plenty of professionals who aren't towing the official line. They also change their advice....and can give out wrong advice for decades...Diabetes is an example
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 30 Nov 20 7.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
It was a pretty bad presentation today. I wish I took a few notes listening to it, but I would also like more scrutiny coming from the press and not the softly softly approach by the likes of Hugh Pym.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chris123 hove actually 30 Nov 20 7.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
You remember that Darwin guy? Professional associations are fallible for various reasons and there are plenty of professionals who aren't towing the official line. They also change their advice....and can give out wrong advice for decades...Diabetes is an example Canada?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 30 Nov 20 7.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
You remember that Darwin guy? Professional associations are fallible for various reasons and there are plenty of professionals who aren't towing the official line. They also change their advice....and can give out wrong advice for decades...Diabetes is an example Didn't the American version of the BMA classify being gay as a mental illness up until the late 1960's.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 30 Nov 20 7.17pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
So Hancock is specifically asked “will people not be allowed to go to certain places if they don’t take the vaccine”? His reply completely and utterly ignored the question even though it was explicit. This is exactly why I do not trust this government or anyone in it, or what they tell us. The only answer you can infer from his response is that yes, you will indirectly be enforced to take it if you want to ever visit a public place again. Compulsory vaccination has already been ruled out. However, some places may well demand evidence of vaccination prior to allowing entry. Not necessarily due to any views of their own but because of simple economics. If the customers who demand that they only mingle with those who have been vaccinated outnumber those who have not, then they will have little choice. For instance, if one airline who accepts only vaccinated passengers obtains higher bookings than another who doesn't then the writings on the wall.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Canterbury Palace Whitstable 30 Nov 20 7.28pm |
|
|---|---|
|
And so it begins.
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold... |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Teddy Eagle  30 Nov 20 7.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Compulsory vaccination has already been ruled out. However, some places may well demand evidence of vaccination prior to allowing entry. Not necessarily due to any views of their own but because of simple economics. If the customers who demand that they only mingle with those who have been vaccinated outnumber those who have not, then they will have little choice. For instance, if one airline who accepts only vaccinated passengers obtains higher bookings than another who doesn't then the writings on the wall. Not compulsory but you have to have it if you want to go outside your own house.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 30 Nov 20 7.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DanH
Agenda? He asked how NZ compared economically and I posted a link to an FT article providing multiple evidence that it was recovering well because it has been able to fully open up it’s economy due to the decisive action it took right at the beginning. Him dismissing it out of hand because apparently the FT is ‘biased’ is an agenda. Me responding to his query of how they’re doing economically isn’t. You need to take into account the population and how that is distributed. Also NZ completely shut down, we didn’t.. we should have but the civil liberties groups et al would have been in meltdown had we closed the borders....fact
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.