To be quite frank it isn't unusual for politicians or anything new but to suggest Khan is Mayor of London because he is the most competent and qualified for that role would be bonkers. To identify being of BAME heritage, sticking rainbow flags everywhere and drumming up the ideological and mindlessly dogmatic left wherever possible, including the employment of nonsensical slogans, to secure votes as the most profitable route to take for the role, would be (evidently) correct.

Personally, I don't really pin my resentment on him (fully anyway), I more so look above and below him, namely the people on the street, and scratch my head at how so many, can be so easily influenced, and so weak minded, to be sucked into such charades.

C'est la vie I suppose. London falling further at it's own hands. I miss it sometimes, but that's false memories and romanticism for me. I'm quite happy to either park up or jump off the train at Norwood Junction, enjoy my little happy place (on rare occasions) and head back out of the 'ULEZ zones' these days.

Indeed, welcome to our future.

We were never asked about any of it of course.

Even when you vote against mass immigration with Brexit they decide to let a million people in a year.....and then waffle on about fifty thousand coming in via boat.

Democracy seems to be when you elect someone to do something and they do the exact opposite.

The Tories have revealed who is going to run against Sad Dick Khunt in May's London Mayoral Election. . . . [Link]

She's got more chance of winning the men's 100 metres Olympics final.

After some sort of election, even LaBORE's boss is blaming Sad Dick Khunt for losing something . . . [Link]