This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
ukip (LOCKED)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 davenotamonkey  21 May 14 6.27pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
...yet still no mainstream coverage of the war-on-the-streets in Sheffield due to the huge influx of... well. ...yet, of course Blunkett was not subjected to a tsunami of "racist!!" "fashist" [sic] from the tw@terati and press when he warned exactly about this in November: It's only racist when UKIP say it. Meanwhile, still waiting for any mainstream reporting of this: Naturally, filed under "Crime", because putting it under "Politics" requires a headline along this lines of "Racist ukipper runs into fist and/or knife of law-abiding neighbour". No mention of "kafir" in that article either. Perhaps the press are still busy with twists on their "failed carnival" their rent-an-outrage group of goons and fake-Romanians. Pathetic. These last few weeks have strengthened my resolve even further to vote UKIP. Edited by davenotamonkey (21 May 2014 6.28pm)
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| davenotamonkey 21 May 14 6.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Ouzo Dan at 21 May 2014 6.28am
Quote davenotamonkey at 21 May 2014 4.30am
Quote Ouzo Dan at 20 May 2014 9.23pm
So 2 people disrupt a ukip carnival by shouting racist... The comments about croydon being a dump are perfectly valid. I am currently living just off of factory lane & it's a living hell, in the last 3 weeks I've had a gang of black blokes asking me what I'm doing in a black area, I've had a white bloke threaten to stab me as I was walking down from waddon marsh tram stop, I've also had a gang of blacks & whites threaten to stab me up just for walking past them. It really is the biggest s*** hole & I'm certain I will be stabbed at some point. Don't worry though, they were pretend Romanians: I just love the fear-smear mainstream mediagasm over UKIP at the moment. There is not a single mainstream UK media outlet that isn't piling on the fear and loathing. It's pathetic. The Guardian is being drip-fed smear articles from the Tories, the "Labour acolyte" from the Telegraph is paid by the EU/UK Taxpayer, via a City-funded anti-UKIP organisation to write articles slamming Farage several times a day. The Daily Mail has about-turned from it's constant demonisation of Romanians to claim that Farage is racist scum, I don't even bother with the Times as I'd have to pay to read their drivel. What has become very clear to me, after this, is that the gloves are truly off. The paid-up media don't even try to hide their blind subservience to the political establishment now, and I have lost faith in them to deliver ANY journalistic integrity and balance. In the past I would counter each article I read in the Telegraph with the equivalent in the Guardian. Now it seems I was just reading off the same song sheet. I'm not naive, but I've never been so depressed about the state of my country. Edited by davenotamonkey (21 May 2014 4.31am) The neo left is a funny beast, fake Romanians really? The thing is we have had party after party come into office yet croydon & other towns spiral down & out of control, nothing is ever done about it, instead there is a feeling of being written off by the council. My brother & mum live in the same house, a couple of years ago my mum who is in her 70's had her door kicked in by a gang of black men one held a machete to my mum's throat whilst another attacked my brother nearly severing his thumb whilst the rest of the gang had their fill of anything they wanted & then left, this is one of several similar burglaries that have happened in the area, the police were called & to their credit they responded quickly but no one was ever caught or charged.
That's horrific. I can't even imagine how I'd feel knowing that had happened to my Mum - seriously makes me feel sick. Hope she's over the ordeal and getting on ok mate...
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 21 May 14 6.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote davenotamonkey at 21 May 2014 6.27pm
...yet still no mainstream coverage of the war-on-the-streets in Sheffield due to the huge influx of... well. ...yet, of course Blunkett was not subjected to a tsunami of "racist!!" "fashist" [sic] from the tw@terati and press when he warned exactly about this in November: It's only racist when UKIP say it. Meanwhile, still waiting for any mainstream reporting of this: Naturally, filed under "Crime", because putting it under "Politics" requires a headline along this lines of "Racist ukipper runs into fist and/or knife of law-abiding neighbour". No mention of "kafir" in that article either. Perhaps the press are still busy with twists on their "failed carnival" their rent-an-outrage group of goons and fake-Romanians. Pathetic. These last few weeks have strengthened my resolve even further to vote UKIP. Edited by davenotamonkey (21 May 2014 6.28pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Penge Eagle Beckenham 21 May 14 7.56pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 21 May 2014 6.36pm
Quote davenotamonkey at 21 May 2014 6.27pm
...yet still no mainstream coverage of the war-on-the-streets in Sheffield due to the huge influx of... well. ...yet, of course Blunkett was not subjected to a tsunami of "racist!!" "fashist" [sic] from the tw@terati and press when he warned exactly about this in November: It's only racist when UKIP say it. Meanwhile, still waiting for any mainstream reporting of this: Naturally, filed under "Crime", because putting it under "Politics" requires a headline along this lines of "Racist ukipper runs into fist and/or knife of law-abiding neighbour". No mention of "kafir" in that article either. Perhaps the press are still busy with twists on their "failed carnival" their rent-an-outrage group of goons and fake-Romanians. Pathetic. These last few weeks have strengthened my resolve even further to vote UKIP. Edited by davenotamonkey (21 May 2014 6.28pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 21 May 14 11.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
There are two very significant ways in which the behaviour of UKIP MEPs work against Britian's interests. Sometimes legislation is proposed that would actually work in Britain's interests, yet their ideological voting habits mean that they end up voting against it, on the grounds that they don't want to EU to have more powers. An example could be legislation to allow EU member states to impose import taxes on products that are produced in conditions that would be illegal in the UK. Putting a tax on pork products from caged pigs, or eggs from battery hens in tiny cages (both illegal in the UK but widely practiced elsewhere in Europe) would help the British farming industry by preventing foreign farmers from undercutting their prices with barbaric animal welfare conditions. UKIP would probably belligerently vote against such a motion, even though the outcome would be positive for UK farmers and the UK economy. The other way that UKIP work against the British national interest is their appalling attendance record, which means that they often don't bother to turn up to vote at all. This means that legislation that is bad for British interests can scrape through simply because UKIP couldn't be bothered to actually vote against it.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Jimenez  SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 21 May 14 11.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 21 May 2014 11.29pm
There are two very significant ways in which the behaviour of UKIP MEPs work against Britian's interests. Sometimes legislation is proposed that would actually work in Britain's interests, yet their ideological voting habits mean that they end up voting against it, on the grounds that they don't want to EU to have more powers. An example could be legislation to allow EU member states to impose import taxes on products that are produced in conditions that would be illegal in the UK. Putting a tax on pork products from caged pigs, or eggs from battery hens in tiny cages (both illegal in the UK but widely practiced elsewhere in Europe) would help the British farming industry by preventing foreign farmers from undercutting their prices with barbaric animal welfare conditions. UKIP would probably belligerently vote against such a motion, even though the outcome would be positive for UK farmers and the UK economy. The other way that UKIP work against the British national interest is their appalling attendance record, which means that they often don't bother to turn up to vote at all. This means that legislation that is bad for British interests can scrape through simply because UKIP couldn't be bothered to actually vote against it.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 21 May 14 11.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 21 May 2014 11.29pm
There are two very significant ways in which the behaviour of UKIP MEPs work against Britian's interests. Sometimes legislation is proposed that would actually work in Britain's interests, yet their ideological voting habits mean that they end up voting against it, on the grounds that they don't want to EU to have more powers. An example could be legislation to allow EU member states to impose import taxes on products that are produced in conditions that would be illegal in the UK. Putting a tax on pork products from caged pigs, or eggs from battery hens in tiny cages (both illegal in the UK but widely practiced elsewhere in Europe) would help the British farming industry by preventing foreign farmers from undercutting their prices with barbaric animal welfare conditions. UKIP would probably belligerently vote against such a motion, even though the outcome would be positive for UK farmers and the UK economy. The other way that UKIP work against the British national interest is their appalling attendance record, which means that they often don't bother to turn up to vote at all. This means that legislation that is bad for British interests can scrape through simply because UKIP couldn't be bothered to actually vote against it.
It's been said several times why people are going to vote Ukip yet you still go on about Ukip voters being confused or whatever other reason you can imagine. Ukip aren't a party people are going to vote into number ten.....It's not about that so attacking it like it's a mainstream party just shows the effect it's having upon some on the left and right. It's not about the loons in Ukip or some of their Thatcherite policies that they won't ever get to implement.......It's not about liking Ukip.....It's about rejecting the current EU institution and keeping the pressure upon gravy train politicians who would like nothing better than to say.....No one's voting Ukip.....We don't have to discuss EU or immigration problems anymore.....Any chance they get they will ignore the difficult issues. The majority of Ukip's votes will be directed at the EU and the inaction and failed promises of politicians over immigration over decades...It's affect on housing, services and jobs. mainly at the poorer end of life....The actual working class.....End of reasons. Ukip are the only show in town who can make an impact at the upcoming elections........What will happen at the main election depends upon other factors.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 22 May 14 12.14am |
|
|---|---|
|
My first post in this thread questioned why ukip are being put forward by the media as the only anti eu party, when quite plainly they are not. However the media frenzy has raised their profile considerably. Why would the press want to do this?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| davenotamonkey 22 May 14 4.28am |
|
|---|---|
|
More of your hard-earned going into the anti-UKIP campaign:
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| matt_himself Matataland 22 May 14 5.35am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 21 May 2014 11.29pm
There are two very significant ways in which the behaviour of UKIP MEPs work against Britian's interests. Sometimes legislation is proposed that would actually work in Britain's interests, yet their ideological voting habits mean that they end up voting against it, on the grounds that they don't want to EU to have more powers. An example could be legislation to allow EU member states to impose import taxes on products that are produced in conditions that would be illegal in the UK. Putting a tax on pork products from caged pigs, or eggs from battery hens in tiny cages (both illegal in the UK but widely practiced elsewhere in Europe) would help the British farming industry by preventing foreign farmers from undercutting their prices with barbaric animal welfare conditions. UKIP would probably belligerently vote against such a motion, even though the outcome would be positive for UK farmers and the UK economy. The other way that UKIP work against the British national interest is their appalling attendance record, which means that they often don't bother to turn up to vote at all. This means that legislation that is bad for British interests can scrape through simply because UKIP couldn't be bothered to actually vote against it.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| matt_himself Matataland 22 May 14 5.36am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 22 May 2014 12.14am
My first post in this thread questioned why ukip are being put forward by the media as the only anti eu party, when quite plainly they are not. However the media frenzy has raised their profile considerably. Why would the press want to do this?
Enjoy casting your worthless vote for TUSC.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Johnny Eagles  berlin 22 May 14 8.38am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 21 May 2014 11.29pm
There are two very significant ways in which the behaviour of UKIP MEPs work against Britian's interests. Sometimes legislation is proposed that would actually work in Britain's interests, yet their ideological voting habits mean that they end up voting against it, on the grounds that they don't want to EU to have more powers. An example could be legislation to allow EU member states to impose import taxes on products that are produced in conditions that would be illegal in the UK. Putting a tax on pork products from caged pigs, or eggs from battery hens in tiny cages (both illegal in the UK but widely practiced elsewhere in Europe) would help the British farming industry by preventing foreign farmers from undercutting their prices with barbaric animal welfare conditions. UKIP would probably belligerently vote against such a motion, even though the outcome would be positive for UK farmers and the UK economy. The other way that UKIP work against the British national interest is their appalling attendance record, which means that they often don't bother to turn up to vote at all. This means that legislation that is bad for British interests can scrape through simply because UKIP couldn't be bothered to actually vote against it.
If the most significant concerns are 1. not supporting product safety standards and 2. not turning up enough to the European parliament, then why does every one keep banging on about them being racist?
...we must expand...get more pupils...so that the knowledge will spread... |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.