You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Coutts VS Nigel Farage
November 21 2024 9.15pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Coutts VS Nigel Farage

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 71 of 80 < 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 >

  

cryrst Flag The garden of England 05 Aug 23 5.05pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Great. We are in agreement then. Coutts had the right to close the account.

Whether it was a wise decision is an entirely different question.

I said the very same a while ago but it doesn’t make it right !

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 05 Aug 23 8.10pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by NEILLO

The Russian Money allegation was made in the House of Commons by a fervent ' Remainer ' MP under Parliamentary Privilege. And of course, Farage denied receiving it. For that allegation to be made outside of that Privilege would have resulted in more work for Farage's lawyers.

As I pointed out several posts ago, Coutts had downgraded Farage from a medium to low risk. There is no additional scrutiny required. You've said this before and I corrected you then.

You can continue to spin it or play with words and indeed continue to proffer opinions that don't stack up with facts, that's your prerogative.

There were, and still are, smoking guns surrounding the Leave campaign funding. Which I have little doubt our security services know much more about than either of us. Knowing something and proving in court when a huge web of plausible deniability has been woven around it are two very different things.

Using Parliamentary Privilege to get that out there was probably the only way to make it known. I think he was fed the information by someone in the security forces. All speculation of course but it makes sense to me, because of the circumstantial evidence.

Do you have inside information on how Coutts were grading Farage at the time of the closure, or just in the past? I can imagine him being downgraded after Brexit, him stopping being MEP and failing to become an MP. His visibility and risk declined then. These days he is on a self-promotion jamboree, preparing to re-enter politics on a white horse to save the nation. Big risk.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 05 Aug 23 8.13pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

I meant it was a fact regarding his comments about Brexiteers. If it is not that person I will apologise but if it is, can you categorically say his views will not have any bearing on his enquiry

How can anyone say that but as a professional they absolutely must not and whoever appoints them must both trust them and oversee them to ensure there is none.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 05 Aug 23 8.21pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

There were, and still are, smoking guns surrounding the Leave campaign funding. Which I have little doubt our security services know much more about than either of us. Knowing something and proving in court when a huge web of plausible deniability has been woven around it are two very different things.

Using Parliamentary Privilege to get that out there was probably the only way to make it known. I think he was fed the information by someone in the security forces. All speculation of course but it makes sense to me, because of the circumstantial evidence.

Do you have inside information on how Coutts were grading Farage at the time of the closure, or just in the past? I can imagine him being downgraded after Brexit, him stopping being MEP and failing to become an MP. His visibility and risk declined then. These days he is on a self-promotion jamboree, preparing to re-enter politics on a white horse to save the nation. Big risk.

Any evidence for any of this?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 05 Aug 23 8.35pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

There were, and still are, smoking guns surrounding the Leave campaign funding. Which I have little doubt our security services know much more about than either of us. Knowing something and proving in court when a huge web of plausible deniability has been woven around it are two very different things.

Using Parliamentary Privilege to get that out there was probably the only way to make it known. I think he was fed the information by someone in the security forces. All speculation of course but it makes sense to me, because of the circumstantial evidence.

Do you have inside information on how Coutts were grading Farage at the time of the closure, or just in the past? I can imagine him being downgraded after Brexit, him stopping being MEP and failing to become an MP. His visibility and risk declined then. These days he is on a self-promotion jamboree, preparing to re-enter politics on a white horse to save the nation. Big risk.

You really are a laughable character.

The official Remain campaign spent over twice as much as Leave.
They still lost, and you still can't accept that.

Pitiful.

Both campaigns were at liberty to get donations from other supporters.
You would not be complaining about so called dodgy donors to Remain if they had won.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 05 Aug 23 8.52pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

You really are a laughable character.

The official Remain campaign spent over twice as much as Leave.
They still lost, and you still can't accept that.

Pitiful.

Both campaigns were at liberty to get donations from other supporters.
You would not be complaining about so called dodgy donors to Remain if they had won.

One of the main Brexit donors was Jeremy Hosking who's a major shareholder at CPFC. Maybe we should be investigated for dodgy investments too.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 05 Aug 23 9.53pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

There were, and still are, smoking guns surrounding the Leave campaign funding. Which I have little doubt our security services know much more about than either of us. Knowing something and proving in court when a huge web of plausible deniability has been woven around it are two very different things.

Using Parliamentary Privilege to get that out there was probably the only way to make it known. I think he was fed the information by someone in the security forces. All speculation of course but it makes sense to me, because of the circumstantial evidence.

Do you have inside information on how Coutts were grading Farage at the time of the closure, or just in the past? I can imagine him being downgraded after Brexit, him stopping being MEP and failing to become an MP. His visibility and risk declined then. These days he is on a self-promotion jamboree, preparing to re-enter politics on a white horse to save the nation. Big risk.

What a crock of you know what.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 05 Aug 23 10.11pm Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Any evidence for any of this?

Now THAT is funny

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 05 Aug 23 10.24pm Send a Private Message to NEILLO Add NEILLO as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

There were, and still are, smoking guns surrounding the Leave campaign funding. Which I have little doubt our security services know much more about than either of us. Knowing something and proving in court when a huge web of plausible deniability has been woven around it are two very different things.

Using Parliamentary Privilege to get that out there was probably the only way to make it known. I think he was fed the information by someone in the security forces. All speculation of course but it makes sense to me, because of the circumstantial evidence.

Do you have inside information on how Coutts were grading Farage at the time of the closure, or just in the past? I can imagine him being downgraded after Brexit, him stopping being MEP and failing to become an MP. His visibility and risk declined then. These days he is on a self-promotion jamboree, preparing to re-enter politics on a white horse to save the nation. Big risk.

I have no inside information. The downgrading to Low Risk is in the public domain as it was part of the dossier Farage obtained from Coutts.

If he’s preparing to re-enter politics then he may well be re-assessed but whoever conducts that review will need to do so on a fair and unbiased basis

 


Old, Ungifted and White

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 06 Aug 23 1.43am Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That’s just wrong.

You are another who cannot understand the difference between the cause of something and the reason for it. If you want to go back a few pages. The reasons have been explained. They aren’t the opinions themselves. It’s that they are controversial opinions. They could equally be strident left wing opinion as strident right wing.

Maybe it's you who can't understand there is no difference. In most people's opinion, what you are saying is pure pedantry.

I'm inclined to agree with Matov however. There really is no point debating with a village idiot.

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Eden Eagle Flag Kent 06 Aug 23 10.30am Send a Private Message to Eden Eagle Add Eden Eagle as a friend

There is no point in continuing to debate with this guy - he is a a troll…

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 06 Aug 23 10.39am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Any evidence for any of this?

The smoke from guns tends to drift away over time, and is always difficult to quantify anyway. That’s why plausible deniability is such a powerful weapon.

So evidence, no. Strong suspicion, oh yes!

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 71 of 80 < 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Coutts VS Nigel Farage