You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Who’s at fault - Hodgson or the board?
November 24 2024 2.37am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Who’s at fault - Hodgson or the board?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 71 of 72 < 67 68 69 70 71 72 >

  

Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 30 Jan 19 8.25am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by kev64

A common sense post prevails , let’s blame the board for saving the club, getting promoted and staying in the PL for six season (securing a 100 m investment) and all the other behind the scenes things that have been achieved to reverse the years of decline and under investment.

I wouldn’t claim or shout about that until it happens because it may not. So far it’s just nice pictures.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 30 Jan 19 9.05am Send a Private Message to NEILLO Add NEILLO as a friend

Originally posted by ChrisGC

Kane on corners is unforgivable.

I know he's our manager and of course we all want him to succeed, but the level of sycophancy on here is incredible to me. It's at the level of trying to rewrite history!

He was a disaster for England and really, nothing to write home about at club level. He suits us because as a club our board's ambition matches his ability. It's a good fit.

Yes, it is. Which is why people ( like me ) are defending Hodgson.

But getting back to the original topic, I would contend that we are 3 points from the relegation zone and points wise worse off than a year ago because of the Board and their shortcomings in the transfer market. It's a results business so Roy doesn't get off scot free. But ultimately that is where I think the majority of the responsibility is.

I asked the question many pages ago on this thread - those that want Hodgson out, who would you realistically want to bring in as a replacement ? And would you replace him now ??

 


Old, Ungifted and White

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ChrisGC Flag Wantage 30 Jan 19 11.24am

Originally posted by NEILLO

Yes, it is. Which is why people ( like me ) are defending Hodgson.

But getting back to the original topic, I would contend that we are 3 points from the relegation zone and points wise worse off than a year ago because of the Board and their shortcomings in the transfer market. It's a results business so Roy doesn't get off scot free. But ultimately that is where I think the majority of the responsibility is.

I asked the question many pages ago on this thread - those that want Hodgson out, who would you realistically want to bring in as a replacement ? And would you replace him now ??

I've never advocated sacking Roy Hodgson, I challenged the fawning of a few who seek to promote him as one of the best England manager of all time now that he's our manager.

I've been critical of his inflexibility in games, unclear tactcs behind substitutions and their timing.

I agree that the board is to blame and echo your surmise, although that said I'm actually encouraged by this window because for once it looks like there's a strategy: clearing out the dead wood and getting the wage bill down. The overall model appears to be to tread water which I personally think is the wrong approach long term, but I suppose that's a different debate.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Tickled pink Flag Cornwall 30 Jan 19 1.11pm Send a Private Message to Tickled pink Add Tickled pink as a friend

Originally posted by ChrisGC

I've never advocated sacking Roy Hodgson, I challenged the fawning of a few who seek to promote him as one of the best England manager of all time now that he's our manager.

I've been critical of his inflexibility in games, unclear tactcs behind substitutions and their timing.

I agree that the board is to blame and echo your surmise, although that said I'm actually encouraged by this window because for once it looks like there's a strategy: clearing out the dead wood and getting the wage bill down. The overall model appears to be to tread water which I personally think is the wrong approach long term, but I suppose that's a different debate.


Although on the back foot against the big sides we do now play football don't we, we no longer hoooof ball at every opportunity..even against the big sides.

Performances wise we are and have improved apart from a few games like home Southampton ..although we still in that game had opportunities with our old keeper McCarthy motm to stop us, so I feel to say we are just treading water is unfair to the club.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ChrisGC Flag Wantage 30 Jan 19 1.52pm

Originally posted by Tickled pink


Although on the back foot against the big sides we do now play football don't we, we no longer hoooof ball at every opportunity..even against the big sides.

Performances wise we are and have improved apart from a few games like home Southampton ..although we still in that game had opportunities with our old keeper McCarthy motm to stop us, so I feel to say we are just treading water is unfair to the club.

Apart from a few games?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Tickled pink Flag Cornwall 30 Jan 19 6.03pm Send a Private Message to Tickled pink Add Tickled pink as a friend

Originally posted by ChrisGC

Apart from a few games?

Everyone went on about the Chelsea game didn't they, I never saw the game but apparently we allowed them to take control and we only tried in the dying minutes, but of course Chelsea on a good day ...

..or do you mean is that all?

Edited by Tickled pink (30 Jan 2019 6.06pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
southnorwoodhill Flag 30 Jan 19 6.14pm Send a Private Message to southnorwoodhill Add southnorwoodhill as a friend

Unfortunately there appears to be no ambition. A pity, because this part of the world has a lot to offer. I suspect Parish wants off. The new stand will never happen, and the fact that the playing staff is being reduced says it all.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ChrisGC Flag Wantage 30 Jan 19 7.15pm

Originally posted by Tickled pink

Everyone went on about the Chelsea game didn't they, I never saw the game but apparently we allowed them to take control and we only tried in the dying minutes, but of course Chelsea on a good day ...

..or do you mean is that all?

Edited by Tickled pink (30 Jan 2019 6.06pm)

No, I meant: only a few?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Maine Eagle Flag USA 31 Jan 19 3.56am Send a Private Message to Maine Eagle Add Maine Eagle as a friend

It’s a bit of both.

In Hodgsons post game comments he seemed to me to have a dig at parish and freedman over transfers. You have to wonder about someone like Meyer, he clearly isn’t fancied by the manager so why did we sign him? Parish thought, it’s a free, so no downside. What would be better would be giving the manager the players he wants to play in his side,

As for Hodgson he really is a mixed bag. He is terribly predictable and just cannot make decsisve personnel or tactical changes during games which is terribly frustrating as we lose points from winning positions time and again.

 


Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Midlands Eagle Flag 31 Jan 19 6.04am Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Maine Eagle

You have to wonder about someone like Meyer, he clearly isn’t fancied by the manager so why did we sign him? Parish thought, it’s a free, so no downside.

Parish has gone on record as saying that there isn't a downside which I assume meant that he could get a good fee for him if he didn't work out here

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
MonsterMunch Flag Cambridge 31 Jan 19 7.01am Send a Private Message to MonsterMunch Add MonsterMunch as a friend

Is there really any point in signing anyone today? Does anyone truly believe Roy will utilise them? Bloody frustrating

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
taylors lovechild Flag 31 Jan 19 8.44am Send a Private Message to taylors lovechild Add taylors lovechild as a friend

I'm not really against Parish/the board or Hodgson and think we are doing ok and but for a bit of luck would be a place or two higher; however, Hodgson in his diplomatic way has clearly alluded to the fact that the club pick the players that are signed and he increasingly seems to be distancing himself from the transfer side of things. He also seems to be showing signs of frustration that we are shipping people out but not bringing any in.

I am curious as to what the club's long-term plan is? Are we looking to sign players to fit Roy's game plan (Sako fits that bill) or are we clearing the decks with one eye on the summer and a new beginning, possibly under a new manager? At Roy's age he is not going to be building a football dynasty at Palace, so perhaps the club think we have enough to consolidate this season? If no one gets injured we probably have, but it's a risk and I feel for Roy that since coming in he has seen little investment in the squad. Apparently there are issues around broadcasting contracts which is a big reason why clubs have been less active this January, and is possibly another reason why we've been quiet.


Hopefully come 11pm both Roy and I will be surprised and happy with the day's events, but I am not holding much hope.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 71 of 72 < 67 68 69 70 71 72 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Who’s at fault - Hodgson or the board?