This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 13 Sep 22 9.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Glazier#1
What does that term mean? You are presenting yourself as some kind of political hatchling right out of an egg. Look up these terms yourself. Oh I've just seen that cryrst has kindly done it for you. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Sep 2022 9.51pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 13 Sep 22 9.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Glazier#1
What does that term mean? Social Liberalism is perhaps a more accurate description than 'neo'. Essentially it is about more top-down centralised state intervention at almost every level of society by way of attempting to engineer it into what could be conceived of as a more 'progressive' environment. So for example, the mass expansion of immigration since 1997 has been a very deliberate, and top down, UK government policy. Even when the Tories took over, it remained the same and whilst we have had Brexit since then (something that the majority of Tory MP's opposed by the way), it has made no difference. Social Liberalism wants mass migration by way of pleasing its Corporate paymasters who want to keep wage costs down along with trying to weigh future electorates in its favour. Championed by the Progressive Elements. Social Liberalism IS the establishment position. And voting is not going to stop that. Somebody pulled me up earlier on my earlier stance that voting only serves a purpose until people realise how utterly futile is it. And then Western Civilisation embarks on its final collapse. Suspect it will mirror that of Rome in that the West will fall to the barbarians, in the shape of an increasingly Islamic-dominated, political, legal and social landscape whilst the East becomes primarily a monocultural (and for that read White and Christian) collection of nations. The 3 Seas Project offers a reasonable summary of what shape that might eventually take. After that...who knows? I think the key to it is if Russia and those Eastern and Central European nations that still maintain a traditional European identity can reach some kind of agreement with each other, which as they become surrounded by civilisational enemies might become a bit easier but who knows? I will be long dead by then and would have hopefully offered my own a life-line by way of secure settlement options away from the mayhem But until then, lets eat, drink and make merry. This is 4th Century Rome after all!
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 14 Sep 22 2.39am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Glazier#1
Is that what I'm going to do? No. My main purpose in asking is so that other people reading this can make their own mind up. I see so much NF/Mail/Sun echo chamber stuff on here, I realise that nothing I write will make any difference to these people. It's good, imo, however, for anyone reading these posts to be able to get either a different view, or be able to see the views explained so that they can make up their own mind, if they want. For me to try to change your view? I might as well whistle up my arse lol
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dubai Eagle 14 Sep 22 6.44am | |
---|---|
Thanks Stirling - I enjoyed reading that - Originally posted by Stirlingsays
It's those that don't live their principles that irritate me. Do you live in a highly diverse area or a majority white area? People should live what they proclaim and if you live in a diverse area, while I might disagree with your politics I will at least accept you live your words. Personally, I grew up in a highly diverse area with high crime rates. I can say I lived my views and know the practical outcome of the left/neoliberal fetish for 'diversity'. I can also say I have no more in group preference than say Stormzy 'I'm not anti white, I'm just pro black'. Stormzy is highly rewarded within society and I see very little in the way of attacks from the left on his racial preference....in fact he is lauded and applauded. For me that just shows that this ideological argument is really just a emperor who has no clothes. In fact I think from my position, I can say that being white is less important than being socially conservative. I support those within the non white communities that agree with conservative ordered society values. Where I differ is in the recognition that there will never be enough of them for effective racial harmony to be a reality. Those people are minorities within the minorities but I will always break bread with those people. I think most people who agree with the dissident right would have that position. Instead, what we will have is majority strong group preference from non white communities...As Mohammed Ali said, 'birds of a feather flock together'...the demographic map is the physical evidence of that...the majority of the non white community will always vote for the non white candidate and then claim that white people are the 'racists'...Only white people would majority vote for an Obama because they are actually the least 'racist' ethnic group, a fact that is leading to their own destruction both in power and in numbers. No other majority ethnic group in any nation has ever majority voted for someone from a different ethnic group to be their national leader The classic 'minority against the majority' power structure is the default....tribalism, it will never change and only white people are criticised and punished for it. Multculturalism was always a utopian pipe dream and it was inflicted upon societies without consent and many who objected have been demonised and persecuted. The left say that 'racism' is a great evil for them, yet I'm a big one for not listening to words but observing actions. In truth they justify anti white 'racism' under the far left 'equity' and historical oppression banner. They started with the 'equality' argument, but that was a way in...they dropped that lie and now use whatever tactics justifies their own anti white...especially anti white working class male progression. I view your take on the Swedish election as little more than leftish cope, but you are entitled to your views. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Sep 2022 11.07am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Glazier#1 14 Sep 22 7.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
You are presenting yourself as some kind of political hatchling right out of an egg. Look up these terms yourself. Oh I've just seen that cryrst has kindly done it for you. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Sep 2022 9.51pm) No, I'm not. Firstly, I want you to say what you mean by it, in order to be sure of your references. Secondly, there may be people who read this who'd like to be sure, too.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Glazier#1 14 Sep 22 7.41am | |
---|---|
Good to se that our Hong Kong friend is not below silly insults.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Glazier#1 14 Sep 22 7.42am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Glazier#1
No, I'm not. Firstly, I want you to say what you mean by it, in order to be sure of your references. Secondly, there may be people who read this who'd like to be sure, too.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 14 Sep 22 9.33am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Glazier#1
Good to se that our Hong Kong friend is not below silly insults. I most certainly am not, especially where appropriate IMHO Do you mean " below " or above by the way.? Being " not below " something infers you are above it. I don't believe you meant to say I am above silly insults as that means I would not use a silly insult and therefore what I wrote is not a silly insult in your view. Whistle while you work And while we're at it , what does NF stand for in this quote?
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Glazier#1 14 Sep 22 9.47am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
I most certainly am not, especially where appropriate IMHO Do you mean " below " or above by the way.? Being " not below " something infers you are above it. I don't believe you meant to say I am above silly insults as that means I would not use a silly insult and therefore what I wrote is not a silly insult in your view. Whistle while you work Whatever.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 14 Sep 22 9.53am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Glazier#1
Whatever. And while we're at it , what does NF stand for in this quote? "I see so much NF/Mail/Sun echo chamber stuff on here"
If you mean the National Front then you are saying that the content of this message board has " so much " NF echo chamber stuff. This means that you are of basically accusing the mods of allowing National Front stuff to be posted on here without reproach or comment. You also imply the Sun and Daily Mail are National Front supportive newspapers which IMHO is nonsense. Edited by HKOwen (14 Sep 2022 11.10am)
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 14 Sep 22 11.09am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Glazier#1
No, I'm not. Firstly, I want you to say what you mean by it, in order to be sure of your references. Secondly, there may be people who read this who'd like to be sure, too. Sorry, but quite frankly it's ridiculous: It isn't an obscure word. I'm not going to suck eggs because you or anyone else is lazy. If they don't know what neo liberalism is then why are they even on a politics forum. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Sep 2022 11.10am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 14 Sep 22 11.11am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Dubai Eagle
Thanks Stirling - I enjoyed reading that - I tip my hat, cheers.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.