You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Pawson and Friend apology/dropped
November 23 2024 3.19am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Pawson and Friend apology/dropped

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 7 of 17 < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >

  

TheBigToePunt Flag 26 Jan 22 1.46pm Send a Private Message to TheBigToePunt Add TheBigToePunt as a friend

Originally posted by Willo

To my ageing eyes, it looked like a Liverpool player blocking off Andersen who might have been designated to pick up Van Dyck and he was able to run from virtually the edge of the area and head in unchallenged.

I'd say Fabinho was supposed to block Andersen but didn't get the chance as Schlupp did it for him. Fabinho actually just stood still.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 26 Jan 22 1.54pm Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Originally posted by TheBigToePunt

I'd say Fabinho was supposed to block Andersen but didn't get the chance as Schlupp did it for him. Fabinho actually just stood still.

I think you're being quite harsh to be honest - it was a good delivery, a well-timed run by someone who is virtually unstoppable in the air when he gets it right, and the ball thumped emphatically into the top corner - there are always margins for improvement, but I think it was a good set-piece that will always be fairly hard to stop.

Realistically, even if Anderson managed to evade the bodies and track VVD, he has minimal chance of beating him to that header given where he met it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Goal Machine Flag The Cronx 26 Jan 22 2.00pm Send a Private Message to Goal Machine Add Goal Machine as a friend

VAR is total dross. Can’t celebrate goals at 100% anymore.

‘Clear and obvious errors’ only happen a few times a season (Freddie Sears phantom goal scenario), not 1-2 times per game. It’s become a worse viewing experience for fans.

I’d rather it went completely, but if it was to stay, I think captains should have 1 review per game for goal/red card incidents. The ref should have a 15 second window to rewatch the incident from 2 angles at normal speed - you shouldn’t need longer then that spot a clear error.

Lucky usually evens itself out over the course of the season

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 26 Jan 22 2.04pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by TheBigToePunt

I'd say Fabinho was supposed to block Andersen but didn't get the chance as Schlupp did it for him. Fabinho actually just stood still.

To my ageing eyes it looked as though Fabinho just leant into Andersen preventing him from blocking Van Dyck,Andersen got free and tried to get to the Dutchman who was on the run but Schlupp was in his way.
When a player runs from virtually the edge of the penalty area and gets a free-header at goal there are of course questions to answer.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Bexley Eagle Flag Bexley Kent 26 Jan 22 2.11pm Send a Private Message to Bexley Eagle Add Bexley Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by thetopgeezer

It's taken me until now to watch MOTD and the review of the game because I was so annoyed... and I am 57. 40 years of Palace makes you circumspect, usually immune.

Definitely offside for their 2nd goal. Definitely not a penalty (the worst decision I have seen, given VAR).

As soon as they replayed their goal I could immediately see Firmono was offide and in play so what actually is Paulson doing at that point? Celebrating? When they replayed the penalty shout I could immediately see that the ball was gone, Joto moved towards Guaita and it was a collision. Pawson then spends 5 minutes working the clips hard enough to convince himself black is white and then shoves it onto Friend who hasn't the guts to stand by his decision. To be fair to Friend, by the time you are at the video monitor, the VAR ref has got the clips exactly right to make sure that the onfield ref has to think the VAR knows something he doesn't, i.e. a clear and obvious error.

When as a professional I make errors that are blatant and my fault, I apologise to the client. Why can't we expect the same from these two? If not I suspect we will make Selhurst a place where they are neverwelcome.

And rightly so.

Edited by thetopgeezer (25 Jan 2022 6.56pm)

I can’t argue with any of that. I was willing to give them the benefit of the doubt on the day even though my son was adamant they were blatant errors. He was right, I was wrong, and the PL bosses are delighted that the title race is a little closer. It sucks.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 26 Jan 22 2.17pm Send a Private Message to NEILLO Add NEILLO as a friend

Originally posted by Goal Machine

VAR is total dross. Can’t celebrate goals at 100% anymore.

‘Clear and obvious errors’ only happen a few times a season (Freddie Sears phantom goal scenario), not 1-2 times per game. It’s become a worse viewing experience for fans.

I’d rather it went completely, but if it was to stay, I think captains should have 1 review per game for goal/red card incidents. The ref should have a 15 second window to rewatch the incident from 2 angles at normal speed - you shouldn’t need longer then that spot a clear error.

Lucky usually evens itself out over the course of the season

Yes, which is what we used to say about refereeing errors.

Now we are saying it about VAR - the system brought in to prevent those errors.

 


Old, Ungifted and White

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
TheBigToePunt Flag 26 Jan 22 2.45pm Send a Private Message to TheBigToePunt Add TheBigToePunt as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

Very much agree with the bit in highlight, and it certainly suggests the refs are people with very limited experience of playing the game to any sort of reasonable standard. Some of the things they fall for are so obvious to anyone who has, even in real time.

It's ruining the sport - there's 0 honour left in the game, winning at all costs is the only approach these days. It's a shame.

Regarding refs, and as someone pointed out a few posts ago, they haven't played the game at any level really as they start so young in order to get up the leagues in time to be a premier league ref. Based on the teenage boys who referee my sons under-11s games, I doubt too many of them will end up in the top flight no matter how early they start, but Christ knows there aren't enough people who want to be refs, and if we took away the incentive that a youngster might make it to the top if he starts young enough then it'd be even harder to get officals for grass roots football.

Anyway, I don't think the idea of referees having played the game is all that important really.

Firstly (and this is the lesser point), if they played professional football until 35 before starting out as a ref, they would either be 50+ years old by the time they had enough training and experience to officiate at the top level (and be called too old and slow to keep up with play) or be fast-tracked into top-flight refereeing with no experience behind them (and be called under-qualified and unproven).

Secondly (and this is the big issue for me), whatever playing experience and insight a ref might have doesn't really matter if he is not allowed to use it. The current system of refereeing (including VAR) seems to place no value at all on upholding the wider spirit of the game, focusing entirely on the technical rules, applied blindly and in total isolation to any one split second incident. That same system promotes and demotes referees, so even if an ex-pro has a better idea of what a player is up to when they 'draw' a foul, that ref still has to implement the wishes of the wider system if they want to stay at the top. I'd say most poor decisions (especially VAR ones) stem from fear of not implementing the letter of the law in a technical way, leading to the abandonment of the spirit of the game and fouls given for the most fleeting of contacts. TV has a lot to answer for here - if they didn't analyse every decision then perhaps refs wouldn't feel such pressure to overreact to contact.

Besides, listening to the likes of Shearer say that a forward has 'the right to go down' when contacted, or has 'been clever there' (something Vieria himself said about Jota on Sunday lets not forget), I'm not sure I want many ex-pros anywhere near a whistle.

On your second point, I'm not sure players ever played with true sportsmanship. From the hatchet men of the old days to the divers of today, they will get away with whatever they can because they are competitive animals under pressure to win.

Obviously, it helps hugely when referees wise up (they let more contact go early this season and it made a very positive difference), but any lasting change in the honesty of players would only come about when their own fans demand it.

Perhaps that means you and I have to criticise (perhaps boo or barrack?) our own players when they go over too easily, and not just reserve that treatment for Jota, Kane etc. Perhaps we have to applaud the ref when he waves play on at Zaha or Ayew, rather than join the chorus of pressure to give a free-kick. Not an easy thing to do.

Edited by TheBigToePunt (26 Jan 2022 2.47pm)

Edited by TheBigToePunt (26 Jan 2022 2.52pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 26 Jan 22 3.02pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend


As others have said VAR isn’t working; it often seems they’re looking for reasons not to give goals which goes against the clear and obvious error remit.
I’m no fan of referees but what they do is incredibly difficult - making real time decisions for 90+ minutes in a game as fast as modern football would challenge anybody but players have to take some responsibility - If they didn’t try to con and cheat all the time it would be an easier job.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Dubai Eagle Flag 26 Jan 22 3.04pm Send a Private Message to Dubai Eagle Add Dubai Eagle as a friend

Having real punishment for simulation would help - either within the game that it takes place in - 15 or 30 mins sin bin (depending upon circumstances) or red card -

Or if its a retrospect punishment (& I have only ever seen 1 player penalised after the game) the offending side loses a point & aggrieved side gains 1 point -

Obviously that's just a top of my head suggestion & it would probably need fine tuning but you get the drift.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
CrazyBadger Flag Ware 26 Jan 22 4.42pm Send a Private Message to CrazyBadger Add CrazyBadger as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle


As others have said VAR isn’t working; it often seems they’re looking for reasons not to give goals which goes against the clear and obvious error remit.
I’m no fan of referees but what they do is incredibly difficult - making real time decisions for 90+ minutes in a game as fast as modern football would challenge anybody but players have to take some responsibility - If they didn’t try to con and cheat all the time it would be an easier job.

Players are only doing what their Managers ask them to do.
Managers only ask them as so much rides on Winning a game.

 


"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 26 Jan 22 5.03pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by Dubai Eagle

Having real punishment for simulation would help - either within the game that it takes place in - 15 or 30 mins sin bin (depending upon circumstances) or red card -

Or if its a retrospect punishment (& I have only ever seen 1 player penalised after the game) the offending side loses a point & aggrieved side gains 1 point -

Obviously that's just a top of my head suggestion & it would probably need fine tuning but you get the drift.

Sin-bins will never happen in our lifetime as FIFA doesn't want them. Tho, a damm good idea, works in rugby union to good effect.

We have had 'retrospective punishment' it was stopped in favour of VAR which fans, managers & pundits wanted.

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 26 Jan 22 5.05pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by TheBigToePunt

Regarding refs, and as someone pointed out a few posts ago, they haven't played the game at any level really as they start so young in order to get up the leagues in time to be a premier league ref. Based on the teenage boys who referee my sons under-11s games, I doubt too many of them will end up in the top flight no matter how early they start, but Christ knows there aren't enough people who want to be refs, and if we took away the incentive that a youngster might make it to the top if he starts young enough then it'd be even harder to get officals for grass roots football.

Anyway, I don't think the idea of referees having played the game is all that important really.

Firstly (and this is the lesser point), if they played professional football until 35 before starting out as a ref, they would either be 50+ years old by the time they had enough training and experience to officiate at the top level (and be called too old and slow to keep up with play) or be fast-tracked into top-flight refereeing with no experience behind them (and be called under-qualified and unproven).

Secondly (and this is the big issue for me), whatever playing experience and insight a ref might have doesn't really matter if he is not allowed to use it. The current system of refereeing (including VAR) seems to place no value at all on upholding the wider spirit of the game, focusing entirely on the technical rules, applied blindly and in total isolation to any one split second incident. That same system promotes and demotes referees, so even if an ex-pro has a better idea of what a player is up to when they 'draw' a foul, that ref still has to implement the wishes of the wider system if they want to stay at the top. I'd say most poor decisions (especially VAR ones) stem from fear of not implementing the letter of the law in a technical way, leading to the abandonment of the spirit of the game and fouls given for the most fleeting of contacts. TV has a lot to answer for here - if they didn't analyse every decision then perhaps refs wouldn't feel such pressure to overreact to contact.

Besides, listening to the likes of Shearer say that a forward has 'the right to go down' when contacted, or has 'been clever there' (something Vieria himself said about Jota on Sunday lets not forget), I'm not sure I want many ex-pros anywhere near a whistle.

On your second point, I'm not sure players ever played with true sportsmanship. From the hatchet men of the old days to the divers of today, they will get away with whatever they can because they are competitive animals under pressure to win.

Obviously, it helps hugely when referees wise up (they let more contact go early this season and it made a very positive difference), but any lasting change in the honesty of players would only come about when their own fans demand it.

Perhaps that means you and I have to criticise (perhaps boo or barrack?) our own players when they go over too easily, and not just reserve that treatment for Jota, Kane etc. Perhaps we have to applaud the ref when he waves play on at Zaha or Ayew, rather than join the chorus of pressure to give a free-kick. Not an easy thing to do.

Edited by TheBigToePunt (26 Jan 2022 2.47pm)

Edited by TheBigToePunt (26 Jan 2022 2.52pm)

BTP, you sir are a star, exactly this & youv'e worded it better than I tried to do.

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 7 of 17 < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Pawson and Friend apology/dropped