This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
HKOwen Hong Kong 10 May 21 6.12am | |
---|---|
Nail on head. Conservatives have taken the middle ground Labour needed to regain so hard to see any solution for them. As long as Labour promote pro EU stuff they will never get these seats back, they need to unequivocally make no rejoining the EU a policy foundation. Swallow the ideological pride and try a making Brexit work strategy. Project Fear has proved to be generally a load of crap, the vaccination success which would not have happened were we still in is tangible. Waste of time trying to argue otherwise. Annelise Dodds career is history, imagine being so crap you were shuffled to replace Angela Rayner. Originally posted by Matov
But what policies? What policies are going to encourage people who voted Leave to now vote for Labour as opposed to the Tories? What policies are going to be different?
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 10 May 21 7.08am | |
---|---|
So to summarise what has happened: The ruling parties in England Scotland and Wales all did well I guess a thank you from the voters for the vaccine? Overall all the Tories did really well considering how long they have been in power. It's for the Tories to lose. The SNP still has an iron grip on Scotland and will continue to demand more ransomware from Westminster I don't see Indyref2 any time soon. Until Labour can offer a socialist unionist alternative Wee Jimmie is Queen. In Wales Labour did a remarkable job considering how badly they run the NHS I guess the voters are still loyal to the cause. As for Starmer the confusion from the last few days highlights his problem. He tried to sack Angela Rayner but as she is elected by the faithful she dug her heels in and demanded another job and he caved. I'm afraid the party will continue to re-arrange the deck chairs no great turnaround anytime soon and it maybe that Starmer is the one who gets fired. As for Northern Ireland I think there is trouble ahead from the Unionist parties I really hope I'm wrong. Edited by Badger11 (10 May 2021 7.10am)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 10 May 21 7.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
As for Starmer the confusion from the last few days highlights his problem. He tried to sack Angela Rayner but as she is elected by the faithful she dug her heels in and demanded another job and he caved. I'm afraid the party will continue to re-arrange the deck chairs no great turnaround anytime soon and it maybe that Starmer is the one who gets fired.
I suspect that from Starmers POV, just surviving the weekend is a positive. And makes me wonder if all this Rayner stuff was a clever ruse? On Saturday, all the talk was about if Starmer survives. Then we get the announcement/briefings that Rayner is being sacked. All hell breaks lose. 24 hours later and Rayner is not being sacked. Instead promoted to an office that supposedly shadows Gove. And spun as a promotion. Here we are on Monday. Starmer still in place. And the left seemingly pacified. Could have been a master class in changing the narrative.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 10 May 21 7.59am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
I suspect that from Starmers POV, just surviving the weekend is a positive. And makes me wonder if all this Rayner stuff was a clever ruse? On Saturday, all the talk was about if Starmer survives. Then we get the announcement/briefings that Rayner is being sacked. All hell breaks lose. 24 hours later and Rayner is not being sacked. Instead promoted to an office that supposedly shadows Gove. And spun as a promotion. Here we are on Monday. Starmer still in place. And the left seemingly pacified. Could have been a master class in changing the narrative. Perhaps or it could be that it is what it appears to be confirmation of weak leadership, having to placate people he doesn't want. I guess time will tell who is right. Matov you seem to have a good read on politics so I am loath to go against you but for now I will take the events at face value.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 10 May 21 9.41am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Matov you seem to have a good read on politics so I am loath to go against you but for now I will take the events at face value. LOL. Trust me, I love it when people disagree and there is a bloody good chance that face value is all there is to it. But humour me on this. I am nerd for this kind of s*** and will happily see all kinds of things in the tea-leaves when there is nothing at all.
Now Starmer faces two potential risks to his leadership if he has no intention of standing down. The first is a motion of no confidence from his own MP's, which requires (I think) 40 signatures. This then starts of a new leadership contest. Now there are 38 Labour MP's from the Corbynite Left who would happily sign this no matter what and two more could easily be rustled up but they need at least one heavy hitter to join the. The second is if the TU's rock up to his door and threaten to pull the financial funding that is under pinning the Labour Party which is in dire financial straits at the moment. With Angela Rayner closely linked to both groups. In terms of the MP's who would sign this motion of no confidence, she is considered to be their representative in the shadow cabinet and I believe she shared (might still) a flat in London with Rebbeca Long-Bailey who is/was Corbyn's chosen heir apparent. And Rayner is also closely linked to the TU's. Once again, she is seen as their closest friend inside the shadow cabinet. Also, Rayner is Deputy Leader. If Starmer goes/gets pushed, she is the one who automatically steps up. Now my understanding is that she was putting herself forward to do the round of Sunday morning political talk shows, apparently more than happy to be fed lines from Starmer's people. And I suspect they smelt a rat. Fearing she was intending to rock up on the Andrew Marr show and deliver the stab in the back. Part of a coordinated attack from both the Corybinite wing of the PLP and with the full backing of the Unions. So Starmer, advised I am 100% sure by the likes of Mandleson and Campbell, decided to go on the attack. Starts briefing about her sacking and all of a sudden the story changes hence we get the hysteria. Meaning that she does not get the chance to go on the television and signal the rebellion the following morning. For those crucial 24 hours she was not in the Shadow Cabinet and even if she still goes ahead with this possible attack on Starmer, it can be put down to just her spite coming to the fore. 24 hours later she is back in the Shadow Cabinet, the rebellion has been headed off for now and Starmer gets to start the week still in charge with no formal challenge to his leadership underway. Now, if this scenario is in anyway true, Starmer is still deep in the s*** but he gets to start the week still in situ. He has bought himself time. However, he could just be a f***ing moron. All possible!
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 10 May 21 9.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
LOL. Trust me, I love it when people disagree and there is a bloody good chance that face value is all there is to it. But humour me on this. I am nerd for this kind of s*** and will happily see all kinds of things in the tea-leaves when there is nothing at all.
Now Starmer faces two potential risks to his leadership if he has no intention of standing down. The first is a motion of no confidence from his own MP's, which requires (I think) 40 signatures. This then starts of a new leadership contest. Now there are 38 Labour MP's from the Corbynite Left who would happily sign this no matter what and two more could easily be rustled up but they need at least one heavy hitter to join the. The second is if the TU's rock up to his door and threaten to pull the financial funding that is under pinning the Labour Party which is in dire financial straits at the moment. With Angela Rayner closely linked to both groups. In terms of the MP's who would sign this motion of no confidence, she is considered to be their representative in the shadow cabinet and I believe she shared (might still) a flat in London with Rebbeca Long-Bailey who is/was Corbyn's chosen heir apparent. And Rayner is also closely linked to the TU's. Once again, she is seen as their closest friend inside the shadow cabinet. Also, Rayner is Deputy Leader. If Starmer goes/gets pushed, she is the one who automatically steps up. Now my understanding is that she was putting herself forward to do the round of Sunday morning political talk shows, apparently more than happy to be fed lines from Starmer's people. And I suspect they smelt a rat. Fearing she was intending to rock up on the Andrew Marr show and deliver the stab in the back. Part of a coordinated attack from both the Corybinite wing of the PLP and with the full backing of the Unions. So Starmer, advised I am 100% sure by the likes of Mandleson and Campbell, decided to go on the attack. Starts briefing about her sacking and all of a sudden the story changes hence we get the hysteria. Meaning that she does not get the chance to go on the television and signal the rebellion the following morning. For those crucial 24 hours she was not in the Shadow Cabinet and even if she still goes ahead with this possible attack on Starmer, it can be put down to just her spite coming to the fore. 24 hours later she is back in the Shadow Cabinet, the rebellion has been headed off for now and Starmer gets to start the week still in charge with no formal challenge to his leadership underway. Now, if this scenario is in anyway true, Starmer is still deep in the s*** but he gets to start the week still in situ. He has bought himself time. However, he could just be a f***ing moron. All possible! All that for the last line .
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 11 May 21 12.54am | |
---|---|
The Deputy Leader does not step up if the leader goes, there will have to be another leadership election. Referencing the outgoing Shadow Chancellor, can you imagine being held in such low esteem by your boss that when sacked you are moved sideways to replace Angela Rayner, Star Wars shoes and all
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 11 May 21 8.44am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
The Deputy Leader does not step up if the leader goes, there will have to be another leadership election. No but they get to take temporary charge (or so I believe) whilst the process takes place. And that is crucial because my understanding is that the big change Starmer is rumoured to want to bring about is fundamentally changing the entire leadership selection process. Primarily because this was what caused Corbyn to come to power in the first place. All the text message malarkey that swelled Labours ranks and then Corbyn, who was only ever meant to be the token Left challenger, goes on and wins. Not one but also twice by bloody big margins. Which is why I feel they feared, and still do, Rayner so much. I cannot imagine any other potential candidate at the moment who probably appeals as much to the membership and the PLP as well. She is the danger for Starmer. Nobody else.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 12 May 21 9.41am | |
---|---|
Just had a quick read of the BBS on the Hartlepool outcome. Very predictably most on there are blaming the voters for being stupid and not understanding what they were voting for. That just about sums up the hard left, blame the voters never the policies. And naturally they are outraged over the bill to force people to provide photo id when they vote. So hands up if you don't have one of the following: Passport *The government has not yet announced the list so I expect there will be some horse trading in the trial I took part in they included birth certificate, and utility bills. I got a provisional driving licence (£20-30). Now all the government needs to do is sort out the people on the roll who shouldn't be there and the postal voting fraud.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 12 May 21 12.39pm | |
---|---|
The basic point where Labour need to change is to highlight tax abuses. Ensure the wealthiest pay tax and reduce the tax burden on the average worker. That will give them votes. Improve services, highlight that. That would give them votes.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 12 May 21 2.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
The basic point where Labour need to change is to highlight tax abuses. Ensure the wealthiest pay tax and reduce the tax burden on the average worker. That will give them votes. Improve services, highlight that. That would give them votes. The solution to the tax issue is simple.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 12 May 21 2.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
The solution to the tax issue is simple. Fair comment. The other part of this would be to have a flat rate corporate rax, with no loopholes. Keep it low but ensure everyone pays. No more rich or corporate tax dodgers. I think most would agree with that.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.