Well, using expletives explains very much. Thanks.

A referendum is also not a binding decision so the government have no obligation to follow through with Brexit.

Brexit is a turning in to a f***ing disaster, whatever you voted back then we can all agree on that.

People claiming others are sore losers because they want to avoid the catastrophic economic fallout that seems to be imminent is farcical.

Sticking your fingers in your ears and claiming Brexit means Brexit and let’s crack on despite the consequences is short sighted and naive.

Not everyone voted for the same kind of Brexit, claiming people knew what they voted for is b*llolcks, because we still have no f*cking clue what Brexit we are going to get. If a hard border between ROI and NI is going to happen, that is reason enough to stop Brexit.

The big difference is that when people voted for the referendum in 2016, they had no idea what an exit from the EU would look like. They imagined it but didn't know anything like the information they have now. Further more, after October when big decisions will be made by both the EU and UK on the real direction of the negotiations, British citizens will be in a far, far more informed position to make such a decision. Virtually no one even contemplated what the NI issues would be in 2016 and Farage & Johnson sneakily avoided that hot potato. Now people understand the nuances of that issue and also from the EU's perspective. So, regularly quoting 'how many referendums do we need' is just spreading spurious FUD.

So, to answer your question, only 1 referendum is needed and that's the one AFTER people have a good idea of the issues involved through the negotiations of BOTH parties, both the UK & EU. That time is soon approaching. The one that occurred in 2016 should simply be put down to an administrative error and lacking in any concrete information for the electorate to make any kind of informed decision.

Edited by europalace (26 Jul 2018 7.54pm)

So if there's a "people's vote" and it doesn't go Remain's way, will you accept that or should we keep voting until we get the result the Remain camp (and the EU) want?

It has become farcical but what is most sickening is to see Remains trying every feeble argument and tactic they can muster to overturn the result.

The idea that another referendum would produce an honest, well informed basis on which to vote is hilarious.

You assume that most people understand the details, which they don't.
You also assume that each side will be honest, which they won't.
The only difference is that we are now in the messy part of the process which has been made more difficult by Remainers trying to scupper it and those knobs in Europe.
All the more reason to ignore their crap and push on.