You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Wilf potential ban?
November 24 2024 2.47pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Wilf potential ban?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 7 of 7 << First< 3 4 5 6 7

  

eagleide Flag London 03 Jan 18 12.51am Send a Private Message to eagleide Add eagleide as a friend

Wasn't at the match today, but MOTD did show an excellent ref decision by awarding Sako a free kick (which led to our first goal) after the ref allowed Sako a chance for advantage, before pulling it back. Just saying, credit where it's due.
Still believe Wilf has to be assaulted before a free kick is to be given for him, and sitting in holmesdale upper the foul by Sterling did look a foul.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
dp Flag Tunbridge Wells 03 Jan 18 8.25am Send a Private Message to dp Add dp as a friend

It was a foul - the ref gave it.

I don't see how you can say that Wilf has to be assaulted in one sentence and then talk about "that" decision in the same thread.

The referees call it how they see it - either give them all the tools at their disposal, or accept that they are going to get it wrong sometimes - video refereeing will see more right decisions being made, but might reinforce punishments for diving, red cards and the like. Expect to see a rise in sending offs, and less interesting debate about things like this.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
adrian b Flag Landrindod, Wales 03 Jan 18 8.43am Send a Private Message to adrian b Add adrian b as a friend

Originally posted by bicycle repair man

When the two recent horrific tackles by Kane & Ali were highlighted on MOTD by one of the pundits, Lineker said we don't want to talk about that,let's just talk about the football,imagine if Puncheon had commited a foul as bad as one of theirs,he'd have been hung , drawn & quartered.

The fact those two tackles are being discussed here and had been mentioned on telly means people do care. Get it? Linker is right, MOTD is about using limited tine to accentuate the positive.
I saw last night's MOTD where an incident concerning a player on the bench and spectators was being hi-lighted. I watch for the football and not side shows. I don't care how a manager reacts to a missed chance. The cameras leave the field of play to scan the face of a ball-boy. Not the way to go, and I think Linaker knows it.

Edited by adrian b (03 Jan 2018 8.43am)

Edited by adrian b (03 Jan 2018 8.44am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
bicycle repair man 04 Jan 18 9.27am Send a Private Message to bicycle repair man Add bicycle repair man as a friend

After seeing the blatant diving by Wilshere and Hazard last night,I'm expecting Graham Poll,Chris Sutton & all to call for them to be banned.
They were quick enough to demonize Wild.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
DutchEagleJohan Flag Vlissingen, Netherlands 04 Jan 18 10.28am Send a Private Message to DutchEagleJohan Add DutchEagleJohan as a friend

Ain't that the truth! The more cameras around the pitch the worse the shown footage seems to get. It annoys me massively, the continues zooming around, focussing on stuff around the pitch but also on players while the game is flowing. You want to see MOVEMENT in an overview, not a close shoot up of a single player even if he has the ball. I genuinely think a lot of football game editors have been educated in the showbusiness and lack knowledge of, and love for the game.

Originally posted by adrian b

The fact those two tackles are being discussed here and had been mentioned on telly means people do care. Get it? Linker is right, MOTD is about using limited tine to accentuate the positive.
I saw last night's MOTD where an incident concerning a player on the bench and spectators was being hi-lighted. I watch for the football and not side shows. I don't care how a manager reacts to a missed chance. The cameras leave the field of play to scan the face of a ball-boy. Not the way to go, and I think Linaker knows it.

Edited by adrian b (03 Jan 2018 8.43am)

Edited by adrian b (03 Jan 2018 8.44am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
taylors lovechild Flag 04 Jan 18 12.32pm Send a Private Message to taylors lovechild Add taylors lovechild as a friend

The commentators in the Southampton stream I was watching were very keen to point out that there should not be so much focus on Wilf supposedly diving as it may harm what great talent he has. As it goes, I think the negative publicity actually appears to be spurring him on, although I'd rather people stopped regurgitating this myth that he's a diver.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 7 of 7 << First< 3 4 5 6 7

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Wilf potential ban?