This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Ref: Palace v Everton
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 PZ Eagle  Penzance 19 Nov 17 2.31pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Well he should be forensically removed from the Premier panel of refs. The Vanarama National League is about his mark.
Conjunctivitis.com - A site for sore eyes. |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 19 Nov 17 2.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
I don't accept for one minute that he "Cheated". He gave what he felt was the correct decision based on what he saw from his angle. As for all the rest concerning Zaha this is all speculation with no concrete evidence to go on. Plenty of evidence Willo, watch every game and see how many fouls are given for Zaha.....compared to the fouls for most other players....how many penalties did Bobby madly give zaha...none how many fouls on him did madley give about half.....The clown yesterday was bent, we know it, you know it ,he knows it, just you wont admit the possibilty of one of your hero refs being corrupt or useless or both....you'll just be happy to see us relegated with a lot of help from so called referees. There is so much money in football and betting on football nowadays that the possibility of corruption is growing day by day...you will see in the future just how wrong you are to defend to the death your great referee heros
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 19 Nov 17 2.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by becky
Should have gone to Specsavers then........he was in the perfect position to see what everyone else did. We all saw that Niasse's tumble was somewhat theatrical but we couldn't all see if there was any contact.Clearly Taylor thought there was sufficient contact to warrant the penalty but of course on 'Slo-Mo' replays others have formed a different opinion.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
chateauferret  19 Nov 17 2.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
I don't accept for one minute that he "Cheated". He gave what he felt was the correct decision based on what he saw from his angle. As for all the rest concerning Zaha this is all speculation with no concrete evidence to go on as it is all hypothetical. You learned how to do mind-reading as well, now, Willo? Thanks for telling us what the ref was thinking, my own powers of ESP are a bit rusty these days. Oh, and that foul on Wilf that he didn't give wasn't hypothetical; it actually happened.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Dangermouse Hastings 19 Nov 17 2.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
You cannot blame the referee for the fact that Speroni should have kicked the ball up field, that Dann shouldn't have been disposseed so easily and that Benteke couldn't get his shot on target when well placed. I understand the concerns raised about the referee's performance and of course it will all be analysed forensically as per the normal procedure. Edited by Willo (19 Nov 2017 2.19pm) Funnily enough none of us are blaming him for those errors. Just the major ones of giving a dive as a penalty and refusing to carry out the laws of the game when Everton used our players as Piņata's.
That's Life |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 19 Nov 17 2.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
Plenty of evidence Willo, watch every game and see how many fouls are given for Zaha.....compared to the fouls for most other players....how many penalties did Bobby madly give zaha...none how many fouls on him did madley give about half.....The clown yesterday was bent, we know it, you know it ,he knows it, just you wont admit the possibilty of one of your hero refs being corrupt or useless or both....you'll just be happy to see us relegated with a lot of help from so called referees. There is so much money in football and betting on football nowadays that the possibility of corruption is growing day by day...you will see in the future just how wrong you are to defend to the death your great referee heros I totally refute the charge that he 'Cheated'.Total and utter hogwash.Referees err from time to time but they don't make decisions knowing they are wrong.I've said this over and over again and won't change my mind so I shall refrain from acting like a stuck gramophone record.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chateauferret 19 Nov 17 2.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
Plenty of evidence Willo, watch every game and see how many fouls are given for Zaha.....compared to the fouls for most other players....how many penalties did Bobby madly give zaha...none how many fouls on him did madley give about half.....The clown yesterday was bent, we know it, you know it ,he knows it, just you wont admit the possibilty of one of your hero refs being corrupt or useless or both....you'll just be happy to see us relegated with a lot of help from so called referees. There is so much money in football and betting on football nowadays that the possibility of corruption is growing day by day...you will see in the future just how wrong you are to defend to the death your great referee heros I reckon Clattenburg knew fine well his number was up and he was going to be exposed so was delighted with the lucrative chicken run he was offered. Willo thinks the opportunity was "deserved" because of his excellent performances, which tells you exactly how much he knows about how business is done in the Middle East.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 19 Nov 17 2.37pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
As I stated in my previous post, his performance will be forensically analysed which is the normal procedure. Maybe you could explain the punishment he may or may not receive at the assessment and how exactly any punishment will help us (the team that he cheated). There is no assessment or punishment for crap refs is there otherwise most refs would be demoted each week and we cant have that can we. Thats the reason the FA refuse to sanction video technology because it would highlight just how totally appalling the referees are!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 19 Nov 17 2.38pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Dangermouse
Funnily enough none of us are blaming him for those errors. Just the major ones of giving a dive as a penalty and refusing to carry out the laws of the game when Everton used our players as Piņata's. His level of performance will be determined as part of the post-match rigourous analysis.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 19 Nov 17 2.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
I totally refute the charge that he 'Cheated'.Total and utter hogwash.Referees err from time to time but they don't make decisions knowing they are wrong.I've said this over and over again and won't change my mind so I shall refrain from acting like a stuck gramophone record.
FFS even Shearer who is as anti Palace as any referee said it was a dive....you are the ONLY one who thinks Taylor got it right!! You are very strange if you really are a Palace fan as you say!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 19 Nov 17 2.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
His level of performance will be determined as part of the post-match rigourous analysis. OK ill ask you again.....'and then what happens and how does that help us??
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chateauferret 19 Nov 17 2.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
His level of performance will be determined as part of the post-match rigourous analysis. And when and where will the results be published? A URL would be nice, thanks. I can help with his level of performance: SH!TE. Simple enough. Edited by chateauferret (19 Nov 2017 2.43pm)
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.