Is that sucking it up?

Bully says what bully wants.

"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

I love how your first club out of the bag is about physicality.

There's not equal prize money between men's tournaments - it's based on the revenue they generate. If a women's tournament was to draw the same revenue as a men's tournament, then the players would get the same prize money.

Here's what I mean. If I and a female colleague - of the same age and experience - bring in the same sales numbers, should she make 70% of what I make?

We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

We can move onto other areas if you like but physicality is an obvious area of difference between men and women as nature cares nothing about equality.

All the tennis majors pay equal prize money between the sexes. A large chuck of their revenue comes from TV deals.

Yet more people view male tennis matches.

Viewing figures for Wimbledon 2015 finals:

UK (BBC)

Wimbledon men’s final (BBC) – 9.2m viewers

Wimbledon ladies’ final (BBC) – 4.3m viewers

US (ESPN)

Men’s final most viewed day, despite no representatives from US and Serena competing the day before. 24.4m live minutes viewed – the most ever for a single day of tennis

Australia (Channel Seven)

Wimbledon men’s final– 1.2m viewers

Wimbledon ladies’ final – 700k viewers

Prize money should be more evenly distributed based on viewing figures.

At women-only events female players are paid significantly less compared with similar sized men's events. I have zero problem with players of any gender being paid their commercial worth.

Here, I present to you a clear difference between equality and fairness.

Edited by Stirlingsays (09 Oct 2017 9.49pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

The men do get a match fee of around £1,500 or they did a few years back. Not sure if that has changed.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

I cut you off here, because the rest is irrelevant. If you want to judge someone's value based on their ability to open a jar of spaghetti sauce, then that's your prerogative. It's still wrong though.

Does Stephen Hawking have value in our society? He can't even wipe his own arse let alone hit a tennis ball.

We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

You cut me off because there are numerous obvious examples where we have equality without fairness.

Your point about Hawking is a huge strawman.

You obviously don't like it when the facts hurt your feelings.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)