This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Mark Sampson leaves
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
  Hrolf The Ganger  21 Sep 17 4.28pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by legaleagle
crass But true.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| susmik PLYMOUTH -But Made in Old Coulsdon... 21 Sep 17 5.04pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
I think the FA should ask for their £80K back. I think Aluko is the odd one out in the team and pulled the racist card and was really p1$$ed off with the rest of team who stand by their manager: [Link]
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 21 Sep 17 5.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
More politically correct football madness: I there anyone with even half a brain in football administration? I doubt it.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 21 Sep 17 5.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
The whole thing is ridiculous. Once people are over the age of consent and working it's almost verging upon religious zealotry for people to tell others who they can and can't shag. It makes sense when you send your child to a school but situations like this when people are over age and working....too far. I think that's pretty reasonable, unless it involved exploitation, blackmail or abuse of power etc. Of course once someone accuses someone of using their position of power, its a different matter.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 21 Sep 17 6.01pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I doubt it. They are running scared like the gutless scum suckers they are. And some wonder why people are moving to the Right. It is our duty to the future to speak out against this insanity.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 21 Sep 17 6.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
They are running scared like the gutless scum suckers they are. And some wonder why people are moving to the Right. It is our duty to the future to speak out against this insanity. Quite agree if someone hasn't done anything wrong, then its a spineless corporation that sacks them to protect their image. Not that the image of the FA is anything other than spineless gimps.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| legaleagle 21 Sep 17 7.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
The FA are spineless gimps.And yes,they are only IMO acting now because people in the know were starting to bring up the Bristol matter, That doesn't mean it wasn't right to sack him or that he's some kind of symbol of unjust treatment..If he had an inappropriate relationship/s with a player/s at Bristol,perhaps they should have done something back then.A coach should not be shagging a player. Simples. But indignant frothers spluttering because they have an antagonism towards anyone alleging inappropriate racist sentiments are simply showing themselves up Personally,if I was around a coach who asked (if he did) if a player's parents were coming to the game from Nigeria and,if they were, he hoped they weren't coming with ebola, I'd think they were well dodgy and not an appropriate person to be coach of the national team...others perhaps wouldn't
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 21 Sep 17 7.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by legaleagle
The FA are spineless gimps. That doesn't mean it wasn't right to sack him.If he had an inappropriate relationship/s with a player/s at Bristol,perhaps they should have done something back then.A coach should not be shagging a player. Simples. But indignant frothers spluttering because they have an antagonism towards anyone alleging inappropriate racist sentiments are simply showing themselves up I was right. You did find a way. Playing the race card because you have been slighted is shameful as is pandering to such nonsense.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| legaleagle 21 Sep 17 7.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Judge..to hear you accusing someone of playing the race card after reading your posts for some time does bring a chuckle.. ..your constant antagonism towards immigration and seeming antipathy towards people complaining of racism is an ongoing theme of many of your posts on multiple threads..that might be thought by some to be "shameful" and "pandering to nonsense".Just saying. Edited by legaleagle (21 Sep 2017 8.00pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 21 Sep 17 8.16pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by legaleagle
Judge..to hear you accusing someone of playing the race card after reading your posts for some time does bring a chuckle.. ..your constant antagonism towards immigration and seeming antipathy towards people complaining of racism is an ongoing theme of many of your posts on multiple threads..that might be thought by some to be "shameful" and "pandering to nonsense".Just saying. Edited by legaleagle (21 Sep 2017 8.00pm) Only if you are a bellend. I'd say that I'm spot on and that is demonstrated with greated clarity almost every day. Judge? A good one it seems.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| legaleagle 21 Sep 17 9.28pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Ok, I get it.People who don't have an antipathy towards immigration and those who complain of racism are bellends. Say no more Judge,I think we are already clear what you are
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 21 Sep 17 10.20pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I think that's pretty reasonable, unless it involved exploitation, blackmail or abuse of power etc. Of course once someone accuses someone of using their position of power, its a different matter. Sure, and that's ethical... but these aren't judgements for the state or companies to make......What's the point of being an adult if you don't have agency? Why do people suddenly get all hot and bothered about exploitation when someone's getting f***ed? In reality some type of exploitation is a fact of life in most human interactions. I'm wary of state over-reach into people's personal lives.....making simplistic abuser/victim judgements which destroy careers and reward others and hence create scary incentives and disincentives.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.