You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Boris Johnson interview on radio 4.
November 22 2024 7.58pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Boris Johnson interview on radio 4.

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 7 of 7 << First< 3 4 5 6 7

  

Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 22 Jun 17 2.36pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Originally posted by Lyons550

I think if the Tories went back to Hague and Labour went for David Milliband (clearly I know that these are both out of the equation as things currently stand) then either would be eminently electable...

Except Milliband.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 22 Jun 17 2.42pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

A collapse of civilisation is about three days of skipped meals away.

Totally agree.

Society's concept of efficiency is a problem in scenarios of extremes.

I was really annoyed and frustrated last year when I started looking at what I could do to prepare for nuclear attack.....Basically I'm given no options.

There should be a communal shelter.....But nope....apparently if something isn't imminent and likely it's being 'inefficient'.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Jun 17 2.42pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

The behaviour might be real but the motivation cannot be philosophical.

The alternate view is that human 'fairness' is not philosophical but more instinctive. The confusion would be a symptom of conceit.

If we assume that self interest lies at the heart of human motivation, than fairness makes sense philosophically, and instinctually. The mistake I think is to think of humans in nature as being solitary animals, rather than a omnivorous pack animal.

By co-operative existence, sharing etc the maximised survival of traits is passed on. If we borrow the concept of the selfish gene, its 'motivation' is to be passed on the most (both by you, and all who possess it).

As such a trait of fairness makes sense in a species, that exists on a co-operative basis, as it maximises sexual selection.

Which also explains why we develop strong familiarly bonds instinctively, because they have some of the same traits and genetics as us. By assisting their survival, we benefit our genes too.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 22 Jun 17 3.09pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

If we assume that self interest lies at the heart of human motivation, than fairness makes sense philosophically, and instinctually. The mistake I think is to think of humans in nature as being solitary animals, rather than a omnivorous pack animal.

By co-operative existence, sharing etc the maximised survival of traits is passed on. If we borrow the concept of the selfish gene, its 'motivation' is to be passed on the most (both by you, and all who possess it).

As such a trait of fairness makes sense in a species, that exists on a co-operative basis, as it maximises sexual selection.

Which also explains why we develop strong familiarly bonds instinctively, because they have some of the same traits and genetics as us. By assisting their survival, we benefit our genes too.

I don't think the similarity is surprising. It's more that we delude ourselves about motive. We have created the concept of 'fairness' but it is really just a strategy to gain advantage as you suggest.

We share genes with our relatives so wanting 'fairness' for them in most circumstances is advantageous. We also often share a mutual interest with our associates.
Dogs are the same.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 22 Jun 17 3.21pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

We see forms of fairness at play in the higher levels of socialized animals I think. Chimps and primates generally have some level of it too.

I think I get what you mean though....nature is red in tooth and craw and is often shockingly horrible.

Equality though is a foreign concept to the natural world....well that I'm aware of anyway....Especially so in dogs which have an instinctive hierarchical social structure.


Edited by Stirlingsays (22 Jun 2017 2.22pm)

We have a strange relationship with other animals.

We delude ourselves about our own drives and motives and then wish to anthropomorphise animals with the same delusions.

It's easier than just admitting the base nature of humans. We might dress up or behaviour with abstract and societal complexity but in the end we are just apes.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Mapletree Flag Croydon 22 Jun 17 3.44pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

That's just contradiction.

No it isn't

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 22 Jun 17 3.51pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

We have a strange relationship with other animals.

We delude ourselves about our own drives and motives and then wish to anthropomorphise animals with the same delusions.

It's easier than just admitting the base nature of humans. We might dress up or behaviour with abstract and societal complexity but in the end we are just apes.

It's true, that happens.

Within the age of we live in there's a denial and demonisation of human nature that goes far beyond what is reasonable. Partly out of good intentions but also out of the need to feel superior....even if it is often born from hypocrisy.

We are all hypocrites, it's just that some of us recognise it more than others and stop thinking about it.

Edited by Stirlingsays (22 Jun 2017 3.54pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 22 Jun 17 3.54pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

No it isn't

Never mind that my lad.

I wish to complain about this parrot what I purchased not half an hour ago from this very boutique.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
wordup Flag 22 Jun 17 8.05pm

We need a steady hand at a time like this, not a dithering mush mouth. Interviews like this don't help his chances of becoming PM.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 7 of 7 << First< 3 4 5 6 7

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Boris Johnson interview on radio 4.