This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 13 Jun 17 1.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
No, I want people who deliberately pursue a lifestyle that statistically leads to a longer life average to pay tax in the same way. Because, they also will cost the NHS more than the average. Same rules apply. The problem here isn't from people who are dying prematurely. Its from the people who are living too long. Why is it then that people seem to be happy to tax smokers for their cost to the NHS and not say people who engage in sports, for their cost to the NHS. I think its more that people who obey all the rules, do the right thing all the time, stay in their box and try to live as long as possible, forget that the point of life is to enjoy it. Rather than saving for that rainy day that'll never come, and the five or ten years of life you'll get when you retire. There seems to be a stream of people in the UK for whom everything is everyone else's fault, and never their own. Its the people who smoke, the people who drink, immigrants, the opposition, the poor, the needy etc. I don't accept your logic. People who live longer only cost money if they become ill for a long period. In fact they might cost less per head than someone who lives to 65 and is in ill health through smoking and drinking. This sounds like a justification for abusing yourself to me.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 13 Jun 17 1.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You seem unaware that the population would have leveled out and dropped without immigration. Oddly enough that was not even mentioned at the longevity conference I attended last week. Funnily, enough the statement above would exacerbate the issue in the short to medium term; although I can agree that globally the human population is an issue due to primarily lower mortality rates. What would you do to alleviate the issues with an elderly population, apart from stopping OAPs from immigrating. Will they still be allowed to emigrate to Spain and similar?
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 13 Jun 17 1.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Nothing to do with the natives getting older and not enough of them dying before the age of 80 then? Our population is going to hit 70mill by 2037 going by the birth/death stats even if we stopped all immigration tomorrow. Edited by Kermit8 (13 Jun 2017 1.24pm) The whole reason for immigration was a drop in birthrate. It caused a labour shortage and over a period of time would have lead to a drop in population.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lyons550 Shirley 13 Jun 17 1.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Quite agree. My only objection is that I don't get to pay taxation on the whoring, and drugging aspect. Of course the average person, isn't the issue here. I'm talking about the people who's decisions exceed the average persons, and thus contribute to a longer than average life expectancy. The average person is paying their fair share. I'm talking about the people who are very fit and healthy, and 'enjoy' a longer than average life expectancy. I'm happy to pay my fair share. I just object to paying theirs. How very Tory lol
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 13 Jun 17 1.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The whole reason for immigration was a drop in birthrate. It caused a labour shortage and over a period of time would have lead to a drop in population. If they black send 'em back?
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NKEagle Pyongyang 13 Jun 17 1.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Reminds me of why I'm not a Christian. The reward for being a good Christian is a very Christian afterlife, milk, honey and peaceful tranquillity. What kind of reward is that for a chaste, moderate life. The spiritual reward for not smoking crack, should be an afterlife of crack without consequences. Similarly, if the reward for being chaste and moderate all my life, was whores and excess, Christianity would appeal. Like the South Park episode where hell is a lot more fun than heaven!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
npn Crowborough 13 Jun 17 1.46pm | |
---|---|
Of course the obvious answer to people paying more for the NHS based on how much they use it is to privatise it or simply charge at the point of access - but none of us want that
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 13 Jun 17 1.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The whole reason for immigration was a drop in birthrate. It caused a labour shortage and over a period of time would have lead to a drop in population.
1961-1971 Birth rate 962,000 Death Rate 538,000 year average 1971-1981 - 736,000 and 666,000 1981 -1991 757,000 and 655,000 2001 -2011 722,000 588,000
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CambridgeEagle Sydenham 13 Jun 17 1.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I don't accept your logic. People who live longer only cost money if they become ill for a long period. In fact they might cost less per head than someone who lives to 65 and is in ill health through smoking and drinking. This sounds like a justification for abusing yourself to me. This is technically inaccurate. IHT is levied on estates not individuals. I've already made my feelings on IHT clear on these boards. Social care should be just that - social. The risk should be socialised and people pay across their lifetimes according to their means so that it's available to all according to their needs. Like the NHS basically. I agree that there should be certain pre-conditions but paying for it when you need it and only then shouldn't be one.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 13 Jun 17 1.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by pefwin
Oddly enough that was not even mentioned at the longevity conference I attended last week. Funnily, enough the statement above would exacerbate the issue in the short to medium term; although I can agree that globally the human population is an issue due to primarily lower mortality rates. What would you do to alleviate the issues with an elderly population, apart from stopping OAPs from immigrating. Will they still be allowed to emigrate to Spain and similar?
Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (13 Jun 2017 1.53pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NKEagle Pyongyang 13 Jun 17 1.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by NKEagle
We obviously need a sliding scale. When you're young and healthy, drinking and smoking discouraged, and other drugs illegal. As you get older , and pose a greater threat to the public coffers, more and more fun stuff becomes legal based on your year of birth. For example, maybe legal weed for everyone over 55. Wait a couple years, halucinagenics are free game too. 60? Cocaine's legal for you. By the time you're 70, you have the whole smorgasbord, opiods and anything you want. Throw in legal prostitution at some point in that age range while they're at it (strictly as patrons, that is). You'll reduce the lifespan, and older folks would go out with smiles on their faces. Instead of a depressing chore, visiting dad in the nursing home would be like stepping into a brothel in the Wild West!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lyons550 Shirley 13 Jun 17 1.56pm | |
---|---|
Can i just commend everyone on this thread for keeping the majority of the posts civil the likes of which has not been seen on this board for a few weeks...some good points and debate
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.