This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Snodgrass
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 PA  Bedfordshire 12 Dec 16 9.32pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Snodgrass is a cheat. His apology confirms it. And he'll always have a shyte name.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Inapickle South West 12 Dec 16 9.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by PA
Snodgrass is a cheat. His apology confirms it. And he'll always have a shyte name. ..said with a PA.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
chateauferret  12 Dec 16 10.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Really! nearer the area than the touchline and no player between him and the goal (apart from the keeper)you can defend him all you like but everyone else on here and every neutral who I have spoken to says he cocked up big time. As I pointed out at the time, moreover, through these two decisions, by the half-hour mark Clattenburg had made it clear to our forwards that they could take their game strategy and shove it where the Sun never shines. Edited by chateauferret (12 Dec 2016 10.21pm)
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 12 Dec 16 10.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Really! nearer the area than the touchline and no player between him and the goal (apart from the keeper)you can defend him all you like but everyone else on here and every neutral who I have spoken to says he cocked up big time. That's their opinion - I dont agree with it one jot. Yes I have commented on the decisions looking at them from a referee's point of view. I'm not going to regurgitate what I said - you will have to trawl back to the original post. Edited by Willo (12 Dec 2016 10.42pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chateauferret 12 Dec 16 11.01pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
That's their opinion - I dont agree with it one jot. Yes I have commented on the decisions looking at them from a referee's point of view. I'm not going to regurgitate what I said - you will have to trawl back to the original post. Perhaps you could try looking at them from a Palace fan's point of view for a change?
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 12 Dec 16 11.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chateauferret
Perhaps you could try looking at them from a Palace fan's point of view for a change? I am a Palace fan so this answers your question.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chateauferret 13 Dec 16 1.06am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
I am a Palace fan so this answers your question. So you say.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
thai-eagle  chiang mai 13 Dec 16 5.20am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
He was way out on the left, so it certainly wasn't a "Clear goalscoring opportunity". I have already passed comment on this and expressed these same sentiments so nothing more to add.No point re-gurgitating all of this. Yes, Wickham was on the left but kept the ball (why not use the advantage rule) and put the ball in the net. Not a "clear scoring opportunity" my a..s
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Charlie Croker Hampshire 17 Jan 17 4.35pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Goal Machine
Absolutely disgusting. He is a cheat. Simple as that. Diving is the cancer of football and it will continue until the FA can grow a pair and start bringing in retrospective penalties. After this and Deli Ali last weekend, how many kids are playing on Sunday morning, after watching MOTD, thinking that it is acceptable and trying it themselves? For incidents as blatent as these, there should be a 3 match ban plus a deduction of 2 weeks wages. The FA need to stamp it out, what is preventing them? May not be quite so harsh as you suggest, but this is on the BBC today. Now it's a long way from being implemented, but a 2 match ban (as was handed out in Scotland) would go some way towards stamping this out. Have to accept that Wilf might get caught out at least once a season . . . Also like the suggestion that only the captain can talk to the referee, although in a Chelsea v Man U game it would then end as a 3-a-side game . . .
“My experience of life is that it is not divided up into genres; it’s a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you’re lucky." |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chateauferret 17 Jan 17 5.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Charlie Croker
May not be quite so harsh as you suggest, but this is on the BBC today. Now it's a long way from being implemented, but a 2 match ban (as was handed out in Scotland) would go some way towards stamping this out. Have to accept that Wilf might get caught out at least once a season . . . Also like the suggestion that only the captain can talk to the referee, although in a Chelsea v Man U game it would then end as a 3-a-side game . . . In the case of Man U it's the captain who's the problem. He shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the referee, never mind whispering sweet nothings in Clattenburg's ear for 90 minutes.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.