You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Britain First
November 22 2024 7.16pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Britain First

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 7 of 21 < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >

  

leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 08 Oct 15 5.56pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.43pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 5.27pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.12pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 4.59pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 4.54pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 11.41am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 08 Oct 2015 11.23am

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 10.42am

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.21am

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am

Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation.

However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.


Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Oct 2015 4.29am)

Violence, or the threat of violence, is sometimes necessary for the greater good, against people who have begun implementing and turning their extreme views into action imo.

The SPG v Brixton/South London youth in 1981 springs to mind. As do the assassination of Heydrich and having to front up my cvnt of a neighbour a few years back .

There really is no limit to the fatuousness of your 'views' is there.

I disagree, when faced with violence, usually the only viable response is to answer in kind. I've never started trouble but I don't believe in shying away from bullys, thugs and intimidation either. It should never be your first choice or solution, but often the only response is to stand firm and make a fist.


Of course everyone who says violence is justified only mean it is justified by people whose aims they agree with. To say the 1981 Brixton riots were justified is merely the rewriting of history to glorify a sordid event carried out by yobs egged on by left wing agitators. Come on, why not go on to glorify Broadwater - glorify thugs trying to put a policeman's head on a stick.


Re: Brixton '81. You obviously know so little yet are prepared to say so much. You may be blissful in your ignorance but it is bloody annoying for the rest of us.

I had family in the area at the time. They told me exactly what went on. They moved away eventually - got fed up with being mugged and the constant racial harassment. You speak for the rest of the HOL posters do you then? By the way, would love to hear your neighbour's side of the story.


Edited by leggedstruggle (08 Oct 2015 5.03pm)


1) Do some proper research on the subject.

2) In this instance, if they know their South London history, 'yes'.

3) He disappeared so no chance.

'Do some proper research'. LOL, I know people who were there! Nothing will shake your belief in left wing fairy tales will it.

Perhaps other HOL posters can indicate as to whether the sage of Devon speaks for them.


Lord Scarman was neither lefty nor a fairy to my knowledge. Perhaps you know better?

My aunt, uncle and cousins do. You have no idea of the mayhem and terror caused by the little darlings you champion. All you do is vilify the police trying to protect people and property (but of course property is theft isn't it?). Scarman was a Liberal - say no more.

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 08 Oct 15 5.56pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

I try to give a person helpful advice and this is what I get.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 08 Oct 15 6.05pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 5.56pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.43pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 5.27pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.12pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 4.59pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 4.54pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 11.41am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 08 Oct 2015 11.23am

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 10.42am

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.21am

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am

Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation.

However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.


Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Oct 2015 4.29am)

Violence, or the threat of violence, is sometimes necessary for the greater good, against people who have begun implementing and turning their extreme views into action imo.

The SPG v Brixton/South London youth in 1981 springs to mind. As do the assassination of Heydrich and having to front up my cvnt of a neighbour a few years back .

There really is no limit to the fatuousness of your 'views' is there.

I disagree, when faced with violence, usually the only viable response is to answer in kind. I've never started trouble but I don't believe in shying away from bullys, thugs and intimidation either. It should never be your first choice or solution, but often the only response is to stand firm and make a fist.


Of course everyone who says violence is justified only mean it is justified by people whose aims they agree with. To say the 1981 Brixton riots were justified is merely the rewriting of history to glorify a sordid event carried out by yobs egged on by left wing agitators. Come on, why not go on to glorify Broadwater - glorify thugs trying to put a policeman's head on a stick.


Re: Brixton '81. You obviously know so little yet are prepared to say so much. You may be blissful in your ignorance but it is bloody annoying for the rest of us.

I had family in the area at the time. They told me exactly what went on. They moved away eventually - got fed up with being mugged and the constant racial harassment. You speak for the rest of the HOL posters do you then? By the way, would love to hear your neighbour's side of the story.


Edited by leggedstruggle (08 Oct 2015 5.03pm)


1) Do some proper research on the subject.

2) In this instance, if they know their South London history, 'yes'.

3) He disappeared so no chance.

'Do some proper research'. LOL, I know people who were there! Nothing will shake your belief in left wing fairy tales will it.

Perhaps other HOL posters can indicate as to whether the sage of Devon speaks for them.


Lord Scarman was neither lefty nor a fairy to my knowledge. Perhaps you know better?

My aunt, uncle and cousins do. You have no idea of the mayhem and terror caused by the little darlings you champion. All you do is vilify the police trying to protect people and property (but of course property is theft isn't it?). Scarman was a Liberal - say no more.


I lived a couple of miles away. I know what happened. I also know why it happened. You obviously don't.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 08 Oct 15 6.13pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 6.05pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 5.56pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.43pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 5.27pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.12pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 4.59pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 4.54pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 11.41am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 08 Oct 2015 11.23am

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 10.42am

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.21am

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am

Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation.

However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.


Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Oct 2015 4.29am)

Violence, or the threat of violence, is sometimes necessary for the greater good, against people who have begun implementing and turning their extreme views into action imo.

The SPG v Brixton/South London youth in 1981 springs to mind. As do the assassination of Heydrich and having to front up my cvnt of a neighbour a few years back .

There really is no limit to the fatuousness of your 'views' is there.

I disagree, when faced with violence, usually the only viable response is to answer in kind. I've never started trouble but I don't believe in shying away from bullys, thugs and intimidation either. It should never be your first choice or solution, but often the only response is to stand firm and make a fist.


Of course everyone who says violence is justified only mean it is justified by people whose aims they agree with. To say the 1981 Brixton riots were justified is merely the rewriting of history to glorify a sordid event carried out by yobs egged on by left wing agitators. Come on, why not go on to glorify Broadwater - glorify thugs trying to put a policeman's head on a stick.


Re: Brixton '81. You obviously know so little yet are prepared to say so much. You may be blissful in your ignorance but it is bloody annoying for the rest of us.

I had family in the area at the time. They told me exactly what went on. They moved away eventually - got fed up with being mugged and the constant racial harassment. You speak for the rest of the HOL posters do you then? By the way, would love to hear your neighbour's side of the story.


Edited by leggedstruggle (08 Oct 2015 5.03pm)


1) Do some proper research on the subject.

2) In this instance, if they know their South London history, 'yes'.

3) He disappeared so no chance.

'Do some proper research'. LOL, I know people who were there! Nothing will shake your belief in left wing fairy tales will it.

Perhaps other HOL posters can indicate as to whether the sage of Devon speaks for them.


Lord Scarman was neither lefty nor a fairy to my knowledge. Perhaps you know better?

My aunt, uncle and cousins do. You have no idea of the mayhem and terror caused by the little darlings you champion. All you do is vilify the police trying to protect people and property (but of course property is theft isn't it?). Scarman was a Liberal - say no more.


I lived a couple of miles away. I know what happened. I also know why it happened. You obviously don't.

'a couple of miles away' - that must have been exciting for you watching it on TV. Bit different from having to barricade your house and fight off 'oppressed' mininorites trying to rob and kill you, while shouting racial abuse of course. But you know, keep on looking at things through your red-tinted glasses, I doubt you will suffer similar enrichment in Devon.

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 08 Oct 15 6.14pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.43pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 5.27pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.12pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 4.59pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 4.54pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 11.41am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 08 Oct 2015 11.23am

Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 10.42am

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.21am

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am

Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation.

However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.


Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Oct 2015 4.29am)

Violence, or the threat of violence, is sometimes necessary for the greater good, against people who have begun implementing and turning their extreme views into action imo.

The SPG v Brixton/South London youth in 1981 springs to mind. As do the assassination of Heydrich and having to front up my cvnt of a neighbour a few years back .

There really is no limit to the fatuousness of your 'views' is there.

I disagree, when faced with violence, usually the only viable response is to answer in kind. I've never started trouble but I don't believe in shying away from bullys, thugs and intimidation either. It should never be your first choice or solution, but often the only response is to stand firm and make a fist.


Of course everyone who says violence is justified only mean it is justified by people whose aims they agree with. To say the 1981 Brixton riots were justified is merely the rewriting of history to glorify a sordid event carried out by yobs egged on by left wing agitators. Come on, why not go on to glorify Broadwater - glorify thugs trying to put a policeman's head on a stick.


Re: Brixton '81. You obviously know so little yet are prepared to say so much. You may be blissful in your ignorance but it is bloody annoying for the rest of us.

I had family in the area at the time. They told me exactly what went on. They moved away eventually - got fed up with being mugged and the constant racial harassment. You speak for the rest of the HOL posters do you then? By the way, would love to hear your neighbour's side of the story.


Edited by leggedstruggle (08 Oct 2015 5.03pm)


1) Do some proper research on the subject.

2) In this instance, if they know their South London history, 'yes'.

3) He disappeared so no chance.

'Do some proper research'. LOL, I know people who were there! Nothing will shake your belief in left wing fairy tales will it.

Perhaps other HOL posters can indicate as to whether the sage of Devon speaks for them.


Lord Scarman was neither lefty nor a fairy to my knowledge. Perhaps you know better?


In the opinion of the several members of the legal profession I've spoken to about Scarman, yes, very liberal-minded indeed.

Edited by Cucking Funt (08 Oct 2015 6.15pm)

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 08 Oct 15 6.24pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.36am

Quote DanH at 08 Oct 2015 10.31am

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am

Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation.

However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.



Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Oct 2015 4.29am)


Spoken like a true Corbynista.


Or, if he were Syrian, someone not prepared to stay and fight.


???
My attitudes towards preferred domestic political interaction is one thing.

My attitude towards how I respond to you change radically once you start killing my people.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 08 Oct 15 6.32pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 6.24pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.36am

Quote DanH at 08 Oct 2015 10.31am

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am

Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation.

However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.



Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Oct 2015 4.29am)


Spoken like a true Corbynista.


Or, if he were Syrian, someone not prepared to stay and fight.


???
My attitudes towards preferred domestic political interaction is one thing.

My attitude towards how I respond to you change radically once you start killing my people.


Well you did say "should always be rejected..." but I guess I get what you mean now. Just.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 08 Oct 15 6.39pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

I lived at Stockwell Park Estate as a child. I was there as a 12 year old at the time and watched some of it from the safety of a high rise balcony window.

Those who refer to any justifications are in my view talking out of their rear ends.

I would be surprised if anyone with any decency partook in those riots. The people I watched were just opportunistic thugs.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 08 Oct 15 6.42pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 6.32pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 6.24pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.36am

Quote DanH at 08 Oct 2015 10.31am

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am

Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation.

However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.



Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Oct 2015 4.29am)


Spoken like a true Corbynista.


Or, if he were Syrian, someone not prepared to stay and fight.


???
My attitudes towards preferred domestic political interaction is one thing.

My attitude towards how I respond to you change radically once you start killing my people.


Well you did say "should always be rejected..." but I guess I get what you mean now. Just.

'As a default means'.

I included the word 'default' to mean in normal circumstances.....The systematic mass murder of street protesters is a different ball game.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 08 Oct 15 7.14pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 6.42pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 6.32pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 6.24pm

Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.36am

Quote DanH at 08 Oct 2015 10.31am

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am

Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation.

However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.



Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Oct 2015 4.29am)


Spoken like a true Corbynista.


Or, if he were Syrian, someone not prepared to stay and fight.


???
My attitudes towards preferred domestic political interaction is one thing.

My attitude towards how I respond to you change radically once you start killing my people.


Well you did say "should always be rejected..." but I guess I get what you mean now. Just.

'As a default means'.

I included the word 'default' to mean in normal circumstances.....The systematic mass murder of street protesters is a different ball game.

NOTE : Does not include peaceful Palestinain protest.

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 08 Oct 15 7.21pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 6.39pm

I lived at Stockwell Park Estate as a child. I was there as a 12 year old at the time and watched some of it from the safety of a high rise balcony window.

Those who refer to any justifications are in my view talking out of their rear ends.

I would be surprised if anyone with any decency partook in those riots. The people I watched were just opportunistic thugs.

Doesn't matter what eye-witness accounts you give the likes of K, they will still hero-worship the scumbags and come up with absurd justifications. Nothing shakes their faith in their politically correct nonsense.

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 08 Oct 15 7.25pm

When they kick at your front door
How you gonna come?
With your hands on your head
Or on the trigger of your gun


 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 7 of 21 < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Britain First