You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!
November 26 2024 6.38am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 7 of 13 < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >

  

hcjbrooks Flag 18 Apr 14 11.40am Send a Private Message to hcjbrooks Add hcjbrooks as a friend

Thinking of going down to the Valley for the game today

and paying my respects to Freedman.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
SE25 Flag Melbourne 18 Apr 14 11.41am Send a Private Message to SE25 Add SE25 as a friend

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am


Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not,

A crime ? LOL
Mate , you're off on one.
All he had to do was either ignore it or send a message back saying wrong address.
There was no need to do anything else. He was being vindictive.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
bexleydave Flag Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 11.41am Send a Private Message to bexleydave Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add bexleydave as a friend

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.36am


Yes they will be construed as criminal acts. Like cricketers paying for weather reports. This is because betting may be involved or something that may influence the outcome of a sporting event. See what is happening all over the sporting world to get this fact. If any club are seen to breach the rules in any way, it can be seen as criminal. Of course common law will not be infringed as this is not statuary and often involves civil law, making it a case for only NGOs to enforce within their remit.


WTF are you on about?

 


Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
SE25 Flag Melbourne 18 Apr 14 11.44am Send a Private Message to SE25 Add SE25 as a friend

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am


Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not,


Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club.

And how was he putting his job on the line ?
What would be been guilty of ? Seeing a text?
Jesus wept.
DF could shag your wife and he'd still have been doing the right thing.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
adrian b Flag Landrindod, Wales 18 Apr 14 11.45am Send a Private Message to adrian b Add adrian b as a friend


Yes, like I said, it will be hard for many to understand what I'm writing. But, at the end of the day we're football fans, not lawyers!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
SE25 Flag Melbourne 18 Apr 14 11.47am Send a Private Message to SE25 Add SE25 as a friend

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.36am


Yes they will be construed as criminal acts. Like cricketers paying for weather reports. This is because betting may be involved or something that may influence the outcome of a sporting event. See what is happening all over the sporting world to get this fact. If any club are seen to breach the rules in any way, it can be seen as criminal. Of course common law will not be infringed as this is not statuary and often involves civil law, making it a case for only NGOs to enforce within their remit.

LOL - you're seriously barking.
Keep thinking happy thoughts in your Dougie Wonderland.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
adrian b Flag Landrindod, Wales 18 Apr 14 11.49am Send a Private Message to adrian b Add adrian b as a friend


Blimey, you still don't get it SE25

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
SE25 Flag Melbourne 18 Apr 14 11.58am Send a Private Message to SE25 Add SE25 as a friend

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.49am


Blimey, you still don't get it SE25


No -I can see the point you are trying to make - I just think it's absolute bollocks.
BTW - why do cricketers need to pay for weather reports ?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 18 Apr 14 12.15pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Quote bexleydave at 18 Apr 2014 11.31am

Quote Cucking Funt at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am

What a ghastly, snivelling little sneak he is.


Indeed. If we were all back at school he'd have been bogwashed for that.


He'd be getting compasses in his ass all through double French.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
bexleydave Flag Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 12.18pm Send a Private Message to bexleydave Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add bexleydave as a friend

Quote Cucking Funt at 18 Apr 2014 12.15pm

Quote bexleydave at 18 Apr 2014 11.31am

Quote Cucking Funt at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am

What a ghastly, snivelling little sneak he is.


Indeed. If we were all back at school he'd have been bogwashed for that.


He'd be getting compasses in his ass all through double French.


Ouch, that brings back some painful memories!

 


Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 18 Apr 14 12.26pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Quote bexleydave at 18 Apr 2014 12.18pm

Quote Cucking Funt at 18 Apr 2014 12.15pm

Quote bexleydave at 18 Apr 2014 11.31am

Quote Cucking Funt at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am

What a ghastly, snivelling little sneak he is.


Indeed. If we were all back at school he'd have been bogwashed for that.


He'd be getting compasses in his ass all through double French.


Ouch, that brings back some painful memories!


I forgot to mention the industrial scale wet towel whipping in the changing rooms.


 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
EastEndPalace Flag WithHardNutsCosImAHardBastard 18 Apr 14 12.33pm

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 11.47am

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.36am


Yes they will be construed as criminal acts. Like cricketers paying for weather reports. This is because betting may be involved or something that may influence the outcome of a sporting event. See what is happening all over the sporting world to get this fact. If any club are seen to breach the rules in any way, it can be seen as criminal. Of course common law will not be infringed as this is not statuary and often involves civil law, making it a case for only NGOs to enforce within their remit.

LOL - you're seriously barking.
Keep thinking happy thoughts in your Dougie Wonderland.


Nigel of the highest order mate.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 7 of 13 < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!