This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
jamiemartin721 Reading 27 Jan 14 12.21pm | |
---|---|
Quote redpalace91 at 27 Jan 2014 9.55am
The only real alternative is that Parish sells the club to a richer owner so we can buy in the players we need. I'm sure Parish is the poorest chairman in the PL by quite some distance but on the other hand the fans like him because he is a supporter himself and wouldn't do anything to damage the club. I don't think we can have it both ways unless some rich billionaire happens to be twiddling his thumbs in Sydenham and wants to take over. Edited by redpalace91 (27 Jan 2014 9.55am) I'd rather be owned by a fan than an annonymous billionarire like many other clubs, many of whom seem to be owners of 'questionable moral fortitude'. Theres nothing wrong with being a championship club. I'd rather have character and soul, than money and success. Especially when that success inevitably squeezes out the very supporters who've spent a life time going to games. Tourist football is dull, lifeless and meaningless. A plastic facade devoid of the soul of the supporters.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
thommo1 Peckham 27 Jan 14 12.22pm | |
---|---|
There isn't a store in oxford street labelled quality premiership Footballers and a sub heading reading We have surplus stock and at very cheap prices.. Agents are trying to squeeze as much as there greedy little hands can get right now, as a negotiator SP knows this, This is why so many deals are done at the last minute as the agents think 'well £3 million is better than no deal at all' its just who can keep there nerve and poker face for the longest.
DJ John Peel once said: "Supporting Palace has a certain cult value, like pretending that some Peruvian rock band is the best in the world." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 27 Jan 14 12.36pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Jan 2014 12.21pm
I'd rather be owned by a fan than an annonymous billionarire like many other clubs, many of whom seem to be owners of 'questionable moral fortitude'. Quite right. It's much better to be owned by upright pillars of society like Ron Noades, Mark Goldberg or Simon Jordan
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
thommo1 Peckham 27 Jan 14 12.42pm | |
---|---|
I suspect the Pullis recruitment interview went something like this SP- Ok Tone this is us, this is how much money we have in bank and this is your allowance for The Jan window and this is how much we are prepared to spend on a wage, can you work with that yes or no ? TP- Yes Sp- Your hired. From my experience in the Forces and as a businessman when you start to move the goalposts (lol) change the plan through emotions rather than logic, things start to go wrong.. Stick with the plan CPFC2010 your doing a great job.
DJ John Peel once said: "Supporting Palace has a certain cult value, like pretending that some Peruvian rock band is the best in the world." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Leicestershireeagle South Leicestershire 27 Jan 14 12.49pm | |
---|---|
I still maintain that any frustration coming from Pulis is the result of the market, not anything internally. I am supremely confident that two things have happened since Pulis arrived: 1) A transfer budget has been established for this window. 2) CPFC2010 have stuck by this agreement. So Pulis has X amount for transfers, and Y ammount for wages, and all involved feel that they can get some players in that fit this criteria and that will add to the squad. Phones calls are made, and a club asks for more than X. An agent says his player wants to come and play for us, but wants more than Y. What's the club to do? In my opinion, do what we assume they are doing; sticking by their guns. TP will surely be frustrated, but I'd say any tabloid stories are putting two and together and getting five. "Palace haven't signed anyone, TP says he's frustrated, so there must be internal issues! Quick, to the printing press!" What's more frustrating is some fans panicing and pressing their own self-destruct button. If we reach February 1st with the same squad, then that's the time to discuss how we will fare for the rest of the season. Until then, we should have faith, and ignore the nonsense in the press that is made up of assumptions and guesswork.
RED AND BLUE ARMY! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuart_Eagle Kent 27 Jan 14 12.49pm | |
---|---|
Quote thommo1 at 27 Jan 2014 12.42pm
I suspect the Pullis recruitment interview went something like this SP- Ok Tone this is us, this is how much money we have in bank and this is your allowance for The Jan window and this is how much we are prepared to spend on a wage, can you work with that yes or no ? TP- Yes Sp- Your hired. From my experience in the Forces and as a businessman when you start to move the goalposts (lol) change the plan through emotions rather than logic, things start to go wrong.. Stick with the plan CPFC2010 your doing a great job.
Stick to what we are doing and build slowly, we know more than most what going for broke can do. If we succeed and stay up then we can start to raise the budget in the summer Edited by Stuart_Eagle (27 Jan 2014 12.50pm)
we're the Arthur, we're the Arthur, we're the Arthur over here! Positive! Proud & Palace - W block, AW |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Sash Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 27 Jan 14 1.12pm | |
---|---|
Quote Ian J at 27 Jan 2014 12.36pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Jan 2014 12.21pm
I'd rather be owned by a fan than an annonymous billionarire like many other clubs, many of whom seem to be owners of 'questionable moral fortitude'. Quite right. It's much better to be owned by upright pillars of society like Ron Noades, Mark Goldberg or Simon Jordan
As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Leicestershireeagle South Leicestershire 27 Jan 14 1.20pm | |
---|---|
Quote The Sash at 27 Jan 2014 1.12pm
Quote Ian J at 27 Jan 2014 12.36pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Jan 2014 12.21pm
I'd rather be owned by a fan than an annonymous billionarire like many other clubs, many of whom seem to be owners of 'questionable moral fortitude'. Quite right. It's much better to be owned by upright pillars of society like Ron Noades, Mark Goldberg or Simon Jordan
And yet, some think matching Goldberg and Jordan's "ambition" is the answer now? I think all of us would do something slightly different to how CPFC2010 do it, but quite frankly we are unbelievably fortunate to be in the position are in now. Grass is greener and all that, not to mention the definition of insanity.
RED AND BLUE ARMY! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
beagle pom tiddly om pom pom 27 Jan 14 1.23pm | |
---|---|
Quote The Sash at 27 Jan 2014 1.12pm
Quote Ian J at 27 Jan 2014 12.36pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Jan 2014 12.21pm
I'd rather be owned by a fan than an annonymous billionarire like many other clubs, many of whom seem to be owners of 'questionable moral fortitude'. Quite right. It's much better to be owned by upright pillars of society like Ron Noades, Mark Goldberg or Simon Jordan
When the time comes, I want die just like my Dad - at peace and asleep. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Sash Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 27 Jan 14 1.24pm | |
---|---|
Quote Leicestershireeagle at 27 Jan 2014 1.20pm
Quote The Sash at 27 Jan 2014 1.12pm
Quote Ian J at 27 Jan 2014 12.36pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Jan 2014 12.21pm
I'd rather be owned by a fan than an annonymous billionarire like many other clubs, many of whom seem to be owners of 'questionable moral fortitude'. Quite right. It's much better to be owned by upright pillars of society like Ron Noades, Mark Goldberg or Simon Jordan
And yet, some think matching Goldberg and Jordan's "ambition" is the answer now? I think all of us would do something slightly different to how CPFC2010 do it, but quite frankly we are unbelievably fortunate to be in the position are in now. Grass is greener and all that, not to mention the definition of insanity. Nothing wrong with matching the vision and ambition - its all in the execution and whose hands that is in to deliver... Bloye had none and was bent as nine pence. Uncle Rons ambition went as far as the end of his own nose. Goldie had the vision but not two ha'pennies to rub together and Jordan had the ambition but absolutely clueless in how to deliver it.
As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Leicestershireeagle South Leicestershire 27 Jan 14 1.27pm | |
---|---|
Quote The Sash at 27 Jan 2014 1.24pm
Quote Leicestershireeagle at 27 Jan 2014 1.20pm
Quote The Sash at 27 Jan 2014 1.12pm
Quote Ian J at 27 Jan 2014 12.36pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Jan 2014 12.21pm
I'd rather be owned by a fan than an annonymous billionarire like many other clubs, many of whom seem to be owners of 'questionable moral fortitude'. Quite right. It's much better to be owned by upright pillars of society like Ron Noades, Mark Goldberg or Simon Jordan
And yet, some think matching Goldberg and Jordan's "ambition" is the answer now? I think all of us would do something slightly different to how CPFC2010 do it, but quite frankly we are unbelievably fortunate to be in the position are in now. Grass is greener and all that, not to mention the definition of insanity. Nothing wrong with matching the vision and ambition - its all in the execution and whose hands that is in to deliver... Bloye had none and was bent as nine pence. Uncle Rons ambition went as far as the end of his own nose. Goldie had the vision but not two ha'pennies to rub together and Jordan had the ambition but absolutely clueless in how to deliver it. Absolutely, but ambition is not synonymous with throwing money at a situation, and a lack of transfer activity so far is not synonymous with a lack of ambition.
RED AND BLUE ARMY! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Slimey Toad Karsiyaka, North Cyprus 27 Jan 14 1.37pm | |
---|---|
Quote beagle at 27 Jan 2014 1.23pm
Quote The Sash at 27 Jan 2014 1.12pm
Quote Ian J at 27 Jan 2014 12.36pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Jan 2014 12.21pm
I'd rather be owned by a fan than an annonymous billionarire like many other clubs, many of whom seem to be owners of 'questionable moral fortitude'. Quite right. It's much better to be owned by upright pillars of society like Ron Noades, Mark Goldberg or Simon Jordan
I think you miss the point. Yeah, you've come up with a veritable rogues gallery. But at least they seemed human, tangible, characters you could love/hate - not a consortium of steel magnates from the Indian sub-continent who had never even visited Selhurst Park and asked their manager to conduct meetings in Mumbai.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.