This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 11 Jul 17 11.29am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
There's been a very nasty one reported for the last week or so. A very unlucky brown-skinned couple whose car stopped at traffic lights in London and they were burnt to buggery by some cvnt passing with sulphuric acid. He must have been hunting. Has handed himself in now. GBH. Should be attempted murder. No different to terrorism. For once we agree....though we await to hear if it was.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 11 Jul 17 11.55am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
I read the female victim's witness statement to journos. Random attack. You can still call it road rage if you want to lessen the severity of the crime even if it is revealed to be another assault by a right-wing loon. Though Detective Superintendent Neil Matthews, said the attack was a ‘horrendous act of violence’ Post a link and let people make their minds up. If it was a 'hate crime', then whomever was the perpetrator should feel the full force of the law. However, as your description is vague and you are not in possession of the facts, why don't you drop the insinuation that I would feel more comfortable with it being classed as road rage. Labelling this attack has been your thing, presumably because it fits your anti Brexit agenda.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 11 Jul 17 1.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Do you believe that this act was carried out because the country voted for Brexit? That is the hypothesis being put forward by the likes of Gusset. Absolute crap.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 11 Jul 17 1.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Absolute crap. You posted a link from the hilariously named newspaper 'The Independent', headlined, "Brexit vote sees highest spike in religious and racial hate crimes ever recorded."
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 11 Jul 17 2.42pm | |
---|---|
All those on this thread....notably Steeleye whathisname....Should watch this video of a discussion wit the Hungarian PM over Brexit before they continue with their ridiculous...the EU holds all the cards....the UK will be punished...it's all awful...narritives. Their angle on Brexit is more about their views than anything connected to a balanced reality. I've also heard similar from Ireland's PM and business leaders in Germany and elsewhere in the EU. Edited by Stirlingsays (11 Jul 2017 3.33pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
elgrande bedford 11 Jul 17 3.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Next you'll be asking why acid attacks on Muslims are deemed islamaphobic. Still using the plural then.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
davenotamonkey 11 Jul 17 3.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
OED - Terrorism - The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims. We can tick off the first two points and as for the last we will have to wait to see if he is one of yours. The odds are not in your favour. Thank you for confirming you have no idea if there was a political motive, resulting in this act failing to meet the dictionary definition of terrorism, no matter how much you wish it so. If you cannot understand that conformity to all clauses in a definition is a requirement for classification according to that definition, then I cannot help you. Should the dictionary definition change, or more information come to light, then I don't doubt the authorities will update this incident accordingly. At present: “While enquiries into this attack remain ongoing, there is no current information to suggest that this attack was racially or religiously motivated,” "One of mine". What's that then? Are you saying I would throw acid in the faces of people, or condone those that do? The "odds are not in my favour": you are attempting to connect me, or my views with the perpetrator and his/her views. Please clarify, as I would not be ruling out legal recourse. I have taken screenshots of your post. You are sailing very close to the wind.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 11 Jul 17 4.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
Thank you for confirming you have no idea if there was a political motive, resulting in this act failing to meet the dictionary definition of terrorism, no matter how much you wish it so. If you cannot understand that conformity to all clauses in a definition is a requirement for classification according to that definition, then I cannot help you. Should the dictionary definition change, or more information come to light, then I don't doubt the authorities will update this incident accordingly. At present: “While enquiries into this attack remain ongoing, there is no current information to suggest that this attack was racially or religiously motivated,” "One of mine". What's that then? Are you saying I would throw acid in the faces of people, or condone those that do? The "odds are not in my favour": you are attempting to connect me, or my views with the perpetrator and his/her views. Please clarify, as I would not be ruling out legal recourse. I have taken screenshots of your post. You are sailing very close to the wind. Someone who isn't a monkey?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 11 Jul 17 4.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
You posted a link from the hilariously named newspaper 'The Independent', headlined, "Brexit vote sees highest spike in religious and racial hate crimes ever recorded."
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 11 Jul 17 4.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by elgrande
Still using the plural then. I'm not with you I'm afraid
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
elgrande bedford 11 Jul 17 6.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
I'm not with you I'm afraid You said acid attacks....as opposed to attack....
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 11 Jul 17 7.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
Thank you for confirming you have no idea if there was a political motive, resulting in this act failing to meet the dictionary definition of terrorism, no matter how much you wish it so. If you cannot understand that conformity to all clauses in a definition is a requirement for classification according to that definition, then I cannot help you. Should the dictionary definition change, or more information come to light, then I don't doubt the authorities will update this incident accordingly. At present: “While enquiries into this attack remain ongoing, there is no current information to suggest that this attack was racially or religiously motivated,” "One of mine". What's that then? Are you saying I would throw acid in the faces of people, or condone those that do? The "odds are not in my favour": you are attempting to connect me, or my views with the perpetrator and his/her views. Please clarify, as I would not be ruling out legal recourse. I have taken screenshots of your post. You are sailing very close to the wind. You know, Dave. Someone on the further Right side of politics who likes it really, really hard re: Brexit and is also not shy in having their two pennyworth all inclusive anti Muslim-rant even before the first victims have been put into the ambulance. Now if that is not you then I must be thinking of some other poster who has written countless diatribes on here which if presented in court they may find a little embarrassing. As for 'terrorism' - well if the acid thrower did not do it for warped political reasons then the attack is certainly akin to it and should be treated as severely if the law would allow which was the original point if you had taken my context on board within the old grey matter. It doesn't, I know. Edited by Kermit8 (11 Jul 2017 7.16pm)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.