This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Spiderman Horsham 28 Apr 22 4.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Wasn't this already investigated and found not to be a breach of any rules? Let the whataboutery continue Call it what you like but if you read the article without your red tinted glasses on, you will see it is being re-examined.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 28 Apr 22 4.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
And they continue to lap it up. I have never agreed with the actions of those involved in “party gate” and they should be punished. Not “lapping” anything up but what’s good for the goose and all that.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 28 Apr 22 5.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Call it what you like but if you read the article without your red tinted glasses on, you will see it is being re-examined. No, it's not, as confirmed by Durham Police.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 28 Apr 22 5.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
I have never agreed with the actions of those involved in “party gate” and they should be punished. Not “lapping” anything up but what’s good for the goose and all that. Sorry, but you absolutely have lapped it up, hence the position you've taken. Durham Police have since confirmed there are no plans for any further investigation, and the sole basis of the story seems to be that a 'spokesman for the force repeatedly refused to rule out a fresh probe' - police forces never categorically rule out new investigations, for obvious reasons, but there has been absolutely no change in their position to prompt this article from the DM... it's not hard to work out why they've posted it regardless. I've no idea what other posters said about Cummings, but it's simply more whatabouttery. Edited by EverybodyDannsNow (28 Apr 2022 5.10pm) Edited by EverybodyDannsNow (28 Apr 2022 5.10pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 28 Apr 22 9.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
As Teddy posted it appears it wasn't a ministerial decision. Not true. He posted a Scottish link BMA? You’ve excelled yourself on that post. Edited by Mapletree (28 Apr 2022 9.57pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 29 Apr 22 10.29am | |
---|---|
Anyone posted about the Policing Bill passing the lords? Surely more important than most of what people are egged on to bust a blood vessel over... Vague and sweeping laws that mean they can effectively shut down any protest they don't like, and leave the ones they don't mind. Now any protest, violent or peaceful, can be shut down for something as benign as “loudness” just as an example. Megaphones, chanting, whatever. Any protest against anything can now 'reasonably' (within these vague laws) completely shut down. Maybe people are unbothered due to who they feel will be protesting, but when 'the shoe is on the other foot' we may think twice. A blow for civil liberties, as are other such bills and laws in the pipeline. Genuinely non partisan issues, gaining little interest or traction amongst people pushed into squabbling over social issues rather than pressing issues of government power and influence. Edited by BlueJay (29 Apr 2022 10.31am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 29 Apr 22 11.27am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Not true. He posted a Scottish link BMA? You’ve excelled yourself on that post. Edited by Mapletree (28 Apr 2022 9.57pm) Well I try my best
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 29 Apr 22 11.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
And 56 with sexual misconduct allegations including 3 ministers. I can't believe that the allegations are all true, frankly. If they are we may as well brick up the entrances to the House of Commons, bar the windows and chuck some food and water in every so often. Sexual misconduct is one of those offences where ministers from any party could be guilty. The portly Lib-Dem leader in the Lords by way of example. Not something I associate with the Tories. On the other hand, getting caught upside down, trussed up, tarred and feathered with a citrus fruit rammed in your mouth while being thrashed by a woman incongruously dressed as a badger...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 29 Apr 22 11.56am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
I have never agreed with the actions of those involved in “party gate” and they should be punished. Not “lapping” anything up but what’s good for the goose and all that. The useful idiot of the left more like. Universally despised.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 29 Apr 22 11.59am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Anyone posted about the Policing Bill passing the lords? Surely more important than most of what people are egged on to bust a blood vessel over... Vague and sweeping laws that mean they can effectively shut down any protest they don't like, and leave the ones they don't mind. Now any protest, violent or peaceful, can be shut down for something as benign as “loudness” just as an example. Megaphones, chanting, whatever. Any protest against anything can now 'reasonably' (within these vague laws) completely shut down. Maybe people are unbothered due to who they feel will be protesting, but when 'the shoe is on the other foot' we may think twice. A blow for civil liberties, as are other such bills and laws in the pipeline. Genuinely non partisan issues, gaining little interest or traction amongst people pushed into squabbling over social issues rather than pressing issues of government power and influence. Edited by BlueJay (29 Apr 2022 10.31am) If its vague, there will be a great deal of court interpretation which will hopefully dilute the impact until it is quietly removed from the statute books in a decade or two. Reactionary / populist legislation pushed through by an untouchable majority do have a tendency to be poorly drafted and designed for very short term political advantage.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 29 Apr 22 12.10pm | |
---|---|
From the 'Minister of brexit opportunities'. Jacob Rees-Mogg appeared to make a strong Remain argument during a new interview, calling postponed Brexit measures "an act of self-harm".
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 29 Apr 22 12.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Anyone posted about the Policing Bill passing the lords? Surely more important than most of what people are egged on to bust a blood vessel over... Vague and sweeping laws that mean they can effectively shut down any protest they don't like, and leave the ones they don't mind. Now any protest, violent or peaceful, can be shut down for something as benign as “loudness” just as an example. Megaphones, chanting, whatever. Any protest against anything can now 'reasonably' (within these vague laws) completely shut down. Maybe people are unbothered due to who they feel will be protesting, but when 'the shoe is on the other foot' we may think twice. A blow for civil liberties, as are other such bills and laws in the pipeline. Genuinely non partisan issues, gaining little interest or traction amongst people pushed into squabbling over social issues rather than pressing issues of government power and influence. Edited by BlueJay (29 Apr 2022 10.31am) Their Lordships simply couldn't be bothered to turn up and vote on these important measures. We must get rid of them.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.