No. Online abuse is committed by a tiny amount of White people in a population of 50 million plus White people.

If you extrapolated the number of Black people committing knife crime to make them comparative to the White population that would be an enormous figure.

You can spin this however you like, but you are still clutching at straws.

I think I will allow others to decide if a comparison between levels of knife crime in the Black population and online name calling is a fair one.

It does, because as I said this channel offers a chocolate box take of everything white, and a 'replacement' style suspicion, dislike and dismissal of just about everyone and everything non white. Those people are never going to feature in a positive context in the same way. You yourself say "I'm not seeking the 'positive' within the terms that you endorse no" so essentially admit this. You want people to get teary eyed over 1900 scenes, but have zero interest in seeing positive scenes when other races are involved in a time you're actually living in. You're certainly far more racially geared than most black or non white people I know. You just search out examples to rile yourself up with and legitimatise your attitudes and dislikes.

People are free to view their place in society as they wish. As an individual. That autonomy of thought applies down the family line though and it's 2021 rather than 1900 so you have no right or reason to expect that your family will even be 'white' in future anyway. And no moral claim whatsoever to expect it. As such a degree of openness towards others would be more beneficial than the opposite of that.

How I feel about the extent that you take this stuff permitting, I'm not sure that I've called anyone a 'Nazi'. It's my understanding that Nazis existed in Nazi Germany. Ironically when the golfer recently lost an advertising deal due to a slur and I stated that "freedom of speech isn't freedom from consequence" you're the one that instantly made a 'Hitler' comparison to me. I meant social consequence by way for those using hateful slurs. Or take the equivalents; these Twitter no-marks calling black footballers n***ers. They do so anonymously to avoid the social cost of their comments from family, friends and those they target. I wouldn't for a second want anyone to lose their job due to their opinions so I very much differ from the 'cancel culture' types, though of course many acting in these ways do so on account that they don't have a job or meaningful social circle anyway.

I answered that by noting that you give a self serving free pass to those few in total lockstep with your politics. I'm not sure that a person's presence in the country if they're non white should in any way hinge on what you think of their worldview. That would seem to be an attack on their freedoms (which inevitably matter to you primarily when they relate to what you believe or want). You appear to be on a path towards trading in allegiance of country for one based solely on race. A better balance might be to push for a specific view on immigration, instead of an attitude that routinely writes off so many good people of other races.

Edited by BlueJay (21 Feb 2021 1.21am)

Whatever the take or slant perhaps we could agree that both carrying a knife, and hounding football players with racial insults are both behaviours that we can do without.

Once again, I did not mention the channel when I linked to this video. This video contained no negative references to anyone.

Also, you said that the video wasn't representative, when the reality is that it is. It's what it says whether you like that or not.

I feel perhaps you are poisoning the well by maligning the channel when I focused upon the video. The video speaks for itself. Yes, I do want the British to realise what globalism has done to them and what they are losing and what their children will lose.

In recognising that motive you are correct.

I have little doubt that you dislike the channel as it's against your globalist liberal politics. It's certainly true that it pushes the 'replacement' position which I obviously agree with. However, I regard your description of it as pretty unfair as it's much more about videos for the Europeans/British community rather than criticising others.

As for me, I certainly am aware of significant anti white propaganda in recent years and I'm not afraid to comment on it. Your depiction of me is for you and those like you.

Just as there are movements in the world geared towards protecting non European ethnicities there are movements for Europeans as well. It just happens that protecting the European ethnicity is attacked by people like you.

No one can affect what occurs beyond their lifespan and ultimately all gene lines will be radically altered and probably even die out, however what the individual can do is make what they consider the best decisions for the probable short term futures while they are here, which is what I intend to do for my boys.

I tend to concur with you on free speech.....though it has not fared well in the hands of social liberalism and operated much better under past social conservatism.

Anyway you did call me a Nazi whether you remember it or not.

It's certainly true that I regard European ethnicity as being under direct attack on multiple fronts. It's also true that I believe that enough Europeans should resolve to ensure that they are always the majority within their European homelands or that they will suffer the same disenfranchisement Palestinians do now.

However I also recognise that this is too late now, at least in northern Europe. However, this won't stop me from stating the betrayal of western elites and others that allowed this to happen.

Talk of modern immigration restrictions is a smokescreen as the demographic action required had to happen fifty years ago to have succeeded.....The English essentially meekly sealed their own fate a long time ago by trusting their elites.

Minorities within this country are allowed to organise as an ethnicity in various forms and escape criticism and censor. I view this as a double standard against those whites who also wish to do so.
My contentions are no different to what China do with the Han ethnicity or Japan or even now Eastern Europe...especially Hungary in recent years who have recognised this de-population threat and acted successfully.

However, beyond this protection I certainly not against other races, which is how anyone concerned about Europeans is depicted.

I would also be against Africans no longer being the majority in Africa, or Asians in Asia. My view is represented as controversial yet it is no more so than the Dalai Lama's own commentary a few years back.

As for writing off good people who aren't white, where have I done that? I've always regarded good people positively whatever their genes.

Edited by Stirlingsays (21 Feb 2021 8.58am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

I'm hesitant to swamp the thread as I know these things become ever expanding, and I'm not the best with brevity. I do think you're intentionally seeking to not address or appreciate the point I'm making about the video and channel, but I don't have the energy to rehash. That's fine. You can take whatever tack you wish and of course believe whatever you wish about your own or other races. I would suggest that there are other ways an interacting with and appreciating people of other races than the angles you take - this idea of genetically distancing yourself from them and so on (we can only ever deal with society as it is now). I have one other point to make about your racial genetics interest but I'll make that in the Wilf thread.

Edited by BlueJay (21 Feb 2021 1.33pm)