This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Phil’s Barber Crowborough 07 Nov 20 10.51am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Phil’s Barber
I will leave the comment on anything theoretical to experts and those qualified to make it but I do find the Official figures from the most recent ONS release to be of huge concern. The latest release from the Office of National Statistics (on 27th October) provided the latest Official figures for Covid related deaths for week 42. The excerpt is as follows. ‘The number of death registrations in England and Wales involving the coronavirus (COVID-19) increased by 232 deaths, from 438 in Week 41 to 670 in Week 42 (a 53.0% increase).’ Without knowing your definition of ‘steep’ I would say a 53% increase in deaths week on week is huge and is cause for real concern. The next release from the ONS is due on November 3rd and I suspect the figures for more recent weeks (as yet not officially released) will be extremely serious, which is why the Government are taking further action. So the ONS figures for week 43 (Week ending 23 October) were released on November 3rd as stated. The number of death registrations in England and Wales involving the coronavirus (COVID-19) increased by 308 deaths, from 670 in Week 42 to 978 in Week 43 (a 46.0% increase). So ‘only’ another 46.0% increase In COVID deaths week on week....no, not steep at all. It will be very interesting to see the the official statistics for week 44 (Release date 10th November), which is the week when all the nay sayers and conspiracy theorists on here were saying/posting; ‘deaths are falling’, ‘the trends are not steep’, ‘hospital admissions are not rising’ and this is all just scaremongering... I’m not saying a second National Lockdown was the way to go but I am saying will people please stop talking rubbish, making stuff up and try and stay in touch with what is actually happening. It is not helpful to be posting such erroneous and misleading stuff. Edited by Phil’s Barber (07 Nov 2020 10.58am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 07 Nov 20 11.31am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Phil’s Barber
So the ONS figures for week 43 (Week ending 23 October) were released on November 3rd as stated. The number of death registrations in England and Wales involving the coronavirus (COVID-19) increased by 308 deaths, from 670 in Week 42 to 978 in Week 43 (a 46.0% increase). So ‘only’ another 46.0% increase In COVID deaths week on week....no, not steep at all. It will be very interesting to see the the official statistics for week 44 (Release date 10th November), which is the week when all the nay sayers and conspiracy theorists on here were saying/posting; ‘deaths are falling’, ‘the trends are not steep’, ‘hospital admissions are not rising’ and this is all just scaremongering... I’m not saying a second National Lockdown was the way to go but I am saying will people please stop talking rubbish, making stuff up and try and stay in touch with what is actually happening. It is not helpful to be posting such erroneous and misleading stuff. Edited by Phil’s Barber (07 Nov 2020 10.58am) Firstly the amount and rate of increases are falling. And you did just quote 53%, 46%, 43% rises. The government have only just admitted that the R numbers in the NW and NE have fallen when they were all falling before Boris’s announcement last Saturday. This is exactly the same as before March 27, only with the situation nothing like what it was in March. A pity it didn’t stop the government continuing its false 1,000 deaths which were 260 at the time, onto becoming 4,000. Covid deaths are happening, but other deaths seem to be not happening. Everyone gets tested in hospital and goes down as a Covid admission and patient if they test positive. If there’s virtually no flu deaths from December onwards then there’s something amiss. Hospital recovery rates are now overtaking hospitalisations. I have posted this and some other optimistic good news. Covid kills mainly over 80’s. Even the BBC online ran a piece highlighting the errors and reactions and questioned why we’re not shielding over 80’s. Covid is of course real but it’s important to not let it dictate everything. After this virus fight back after lockdown 1 it may bump along for a long time or forever. Or it may disappear altogether. It is something to continue to socially distance where possible and keep good hand hygiene but not to dictate life and lives. Problem is this lockdown won’t end on Dec 2nd. There will be more of this until at least start of spring. There might be releases into lower tiers for regions but it looks like we’re unfortunately stuck with this blunt hammer approach.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 07 Nov 20 11.39am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Firstly the amount and rate of increases are falling. And you did just quote 53%, 46%, 43% rises. The government have only just admitted that the R numbers in the NW and NE have fallen when they were all falling before Boris’s announcement last Saturday. This is exactly the same as before March 27, only with the situation nothing like what it was in March. A pity it didn’t stop the government continuing its false 1,000 deaths which were 260 at the time, onto becoming 4,000. Covid deaths are happening, but other deaths seem to be not happening. Everyone gets tested in hospital and goes down as a Covid admission and patient if they test positive. If there’s virtually no flu deaths from December onwards then there’s something amiss. Hospital recovery rates are now overtaking hospitalisations. I have posted this and some other optimistic good news. Covid kills mainly over 80’s. Even the BBC online ran a piece highlighting the errors and reactions and questioned why we’re not shielding over 80’s. Covid is of course real but it’s important to not let it dictate everything. After this virus fight back after lockdown 1 it may bump along for a long time or forever. Or it may disappear altogether. It is something to continue to socially distance where possible and keep good hand hygiene but not to dictate life and lives. Problem is this lockdown won’t end on Dec 2nd. There will be more of this until at least start of spring. There might be releases into lower tiers for regions but it looks like we’re unfortunately stuck with this blunt hammer approach. You hit the nail yourself rudi. Socially distance is where its failing. Even yourself know it's the solution. The only way for this to happen is sadly in a forced way. This lockdown is also a warning shot that without changes it can be forced. Unfortunately even warning shots will cause casualties.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 07 Nov 20 11.50am | |
---|---|
No infections among 56,000 people who traveled abroad after receiving Sinopharm-developed COVID-19 vaccine - [Link] 'If true' then great news.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 07 Nov 20 12.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
You hit the nail yourself rudi. Socially distance is where its failing. Even yourself know it's the solution. The only way for this to happen is sadly in a forced way. This lockdown is also a warning shot that without changes it can be forced. Unfortunately even warning shots will cause casualties. Lockdowns and forcing people isn’t necessary looking at the trends although I might agree with you looking at some people in the north, whether they’re ignorant or just friendly people unaware of what they’re doing. Luckily we’re so unfriendly and rude down here you can avoid strangers, neighbours or acquaintances with no problem at all if you want to. Kent and Surrey to Cornwall shouldn’t be in lockdown.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Phil’s Barber Crowborough 07 Nov 20 12.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Firstly the amount and rate of increases are falling. And you did just quote 53%, 46%, 43% rises. The government have only just admitted that the R numbers in the NW and NE have fallen when they were all falling before Boris’s announcement last Saturday. This is exactly the same as before March 27, only with the situation nothing like what it was in March. A pity it didn’t stop the government continuing its false 1,000 deaths which were 260 at the time, onto becoming 4,000. Covid deaths are happening, but other deaths seem to be not happening. Everyone gets tested in hospital and goes down as a Covid admission and patient if they test positive. If there’s virtually no flu deaths from December onwards then there’s something amiss. Hospital recovery rates are now overtaking hospitalisations. I have posted this and some other optimistic good news. Covid kills mainly over 80’s. Even the BBC online ran a piece highlighting the errors and reactions and questioned why we’re not shielding over 80’s. Covid is of course real but it’s important to not let it dictate everything. After this virus fight back after lockdown 1 it may bump along for a long time or forever. Or it may disappear altogether. It is something to continue to socially distance where possible and keep good hand hygiene but not to dictate life and lives. Problem is this lockdown won’t end on Dec 2nd. There will be more of this until at least start of spring. There might be releases into lower tiers for regions but it looks like we’re unfortunately stuck with this blunt hammer approach. Rudi, I didn’t quote 53%, 46%, 43% - I have no idea where you have got the 43% from (perhaps week 43?). 53% and 46% rises in deaths are absolutely huge! I did say I didn’t know your definition of ‘steep’ but by any reasonable persons standards those rises, week on week, are flippin steep! At a time when you were saying hospitals weren’t any busier from Covid-19 cases they were in fact experiencing a huge rise in admissions from Covid-19 related cases. At a time when you were agreeing with Dolphin that deaths were falling, they were in fact going up...massively! The Office for National Statistics data is not an estimate or a prediction, it is factual, independent and the most accurate statistics we will get on the subject. Saying that Covid deaths are falling when they are actually going up by 46% is just plain wrong, not at all helpful and totally indefensible. (Typo edited...53% not 56%) Edited by Phil’s Barber (07 Nov 2020 8.53pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 07 Nov 20 1.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Phil’s Barber
Rudi, I didn’t quote 56%, 46%, 43% - I have no idea where you have got the 43% from (perhaps week 43?). 56% and 46% rises in deaths are absolutely huge! I did say I didn’t know your definition of ‘steep’ but by any reasonable persons standards those rises, week on week, are flippin steep! At a time when you were saying hospitals weren’t any busier from Covid-19 cases they were in fact experiencing a huge rise in admissions from Covid-19 related cases. At a time when you were agreeing with Dolphin that deaths were falling, they were in fact going up...massively! The Office for National Statistics data is not an estimate or a prediction, it is factual, independent and the most accurate statistics we will get on the subject. Saying that Covid deaths are falling when they are actually going up by 46% is just plain wrong, not at all helpful and totally indefensible. Edited by Phil’s Barber (07 Nov 2020 12.52pm) The rate of increase is important, and the rate is falling. Plus the recovery rates are improving and getting on top of admissions. Some balance and exploration of the numbers is important rather than panic because the graph is on the rise or Sky news say exponential every few minutes of the day. And also other deaths aren’t either happening or being reported and excess deaths are not wildly high or increasing either.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 08 Nov 20 1.12pm | |
---|---|
Why it’s not being treated as a lockdown. [Tweet Link]
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 08 Nov 20 1.32pm | |
---|---|
Ministers are to reconsider vitamin D as a potential weapon against Covid-19 after Matt Hancock wrongly claimed that government scientists had run unsuccessful tests. The health secretary told the Commons last week that he had ordered a trial that showed vitamin D did not “appear to have any impact”. Officials now admit that no trials took place.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
gerry theagle newbury 08 Nov 20 1.38pm | |
---|---|
I may be shot down in flames but I think Boris was wrong to let pubs sell beer to be consumed outside of their premises.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Phil’s Barber Crowborough 08 Nov 20 1.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by gerry theagle
I may be shot down in flames but I think Boris was wrong to let pubs sell beer to be consumed outside of their premises. No, I agree gerry. If people had observed the the regulations and guidance in the first place we would not have needed the second National Lockdown. How many examples have we seen of irresponsible people ignoring the advice / not wearing masks / not social distancing and not following the other infection control measures. They reap what they sow but sadly cause a huge impact on the rest of the Country in the process.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 08 Nov 20 2.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by gerry theagle
I may be shot down in flames but I think Boris was wrong to let pubs sell beer to be consumed outside of their premises. The types in those areas will be aware of the trends rather than just ignorance or self interest. Boris probably knows the difference between the reality and the exaggeration of figures to scare the public. We got a glimpse of that in that presentation.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.