You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Gaza Strip 'invades' Israel.
November 24 2024 12.37am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Gaza Strip 'invades' Israel.

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 68 of 233 < 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 >

  

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 10 Nov 23 10.17am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

You were happy enough to state as a matter of fact that we’ve had weeks of hate and anti-semitism though.

Braverman has made the risk of trouble significantly higher - I don’t think that’s contestable. She hasn’t ‘spoken out’ - she’s labelled hundreds of thousands of protestors as hate marchers and anti semites because she doesn’t agree with them. That’s inflammatory by any definition.

I’ve no idea why you’ve decided on that MLK reference - all of the commentary from the organisers of the demonstration are also calling for peaceful protest in exactly the same way.

People who want to cause trouble whether it be Islamic extremists or white British racists don't need an excuse, they will always find a reason to do it.

I am glad that the organisers have called for it to be peaceful, no doubt we shall find out how successful they are at keeping the protestors in line.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 10 Nov 23 10.20am Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Braverman was fired over a serious security breach, quite unusual, then Sunak re-hired her for no apparent reason.

A serious lack of judgement.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 10 Nov 23 10.37am Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

Of course, I sent that in reply to a statement that "the police will allow the pro-Palestine demonstration to go past the Cenotaph twice" which is just factually untrue.

Any trouble on Saturday is going to come from the people looking for it, on both sides - there's absolutely no reasons for the two events to overlap at all.

Braverman's discourse around this has done nothing but stoke the flames and she's as responsible as anyone if it does go off.

I agree with your first two paragraphs, if it goes off it will be the fault of those who cause the trouble, likely both sides

Let's just hope there is no serious trouble and no one hurt.

Edited by HKOwen (10 Nov 2023 10.40am)

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
silvertop Flag Portishead 10 Nov 23 1.27pm Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Not really answering the first line are you. Never mind because lefties always finish with insults when they get confused!

Like I said up the thread, they would have preferred the Israeli embassy but you cant get near that. The US is next best.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
silvertop Flag Portishead 10 Nov 23 1.46pm Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

That is the complaint. I am not a lawyer so I wont pretend to know the answer but she was entitled to speak out. If people cause trouble this weekend it's on their head "Braverman made me do it" isn't an excuse.

MLK was told on many occasions not to march or there would be violence his answer was to ensure the marchers were peaceful and any violence was from the police and racists. That's how he won the argument, or as Obama said if they go low we go higher.

Edited by Badger11 (10 Nov 2023 9.49am)

No she wasn't. She can call the police to account through back channels. However, her portfolio requires her to support the independence of the police. She is not doing that. If she wanted to call the police out for the reasons she did, she must first resign and then say what she likes (within parliamentary rules) from the Back Benches.

She is clearly making a play for leader. It is a long game and one that reveals her unscrupulous character. However, it is clumsy, transparent and deluded. She is seeking to appeal to the gammon right. But I doubt whether they would choose a woman of South Asian extraction, let alone one who has openly attacked the police.

I fear she is the stuff that opportunist Brexiteers are made of i.e. a feather for every political wind that blows but, ultimately, a bit dim. The Tories are masters at adaption. During the next parliamentary term, her ilk will have outlived their usefulness and will be relegated to hopping about frothing from the fringes.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 10 Nov 23 2.11pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

No she wasn't. She can call the police to account through back channels. However, her portfolio requires her to support the independence of the police. She is not doing that. If she wanted to call the police out for the reasons she did, she must first resign and then say what she likes (within parliamentary rules) from the Back Benches.

She is clearly making a play for leader. It is a long game and one that reveals her unscrupulous character. However, it is clumsy, transparent and deluded. She is seeking to appeal to the gammon right. But I doubt whether they would choose a woman of South Asian extraction, let alone one who has openly attacked the police.

I fear she is the stuff that opportunist Brexiteers are made of i.e. a feather for every political wind that blows but, ultimately, a bit dim. The Tories are masters at adaption. During the next parliamentary term, her ilk will have outlived their usefulness and will be relegated to hopping about frothing from the fringes.

That's odd considering the number of senior politicians over the years who have publicly criticised the Police.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 10 Nov 23 2.40pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

No she wasn't. She can call the police to account through back channels. However, her portfolio requires her to support the independence of the police. She is not doing that. If she wanted to call the police out for the reasons she did, she must first resign and then say what she likes (within parliamentary rules) from the Back Benches.

She is clearly making a play for leader. It is a long game and one that reveals her unscrupulous character. However, it is clumsy, transparent and deluded. She is seeking to appeal to the gammon right. But I doubt whether they would choose a woman of South Asian extraction, let alone one who has openly attacked the police.

I fear she is the stuff that opportunist Brexiteers are made of i.e. a feather for every political wind that blows but, ultimately, a bit dim. The Tories are masters at adaption. During the next parliamentary term, her ilk will have outlived their usefulness and will be relegated to hopping about frothing from the fringes.

Im not a supporter of either main party's & i thought it was the Home Secretary who had the power to ban marches, Stand to be corrected by all of you that think you know better'

[Link]

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Glazier#1 Flag 10 Nov 23 2.46pm Send a Private Message to Glazier#1 Add Glazier#1 as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

I expect those nice, peace-loving Hamas supporters will be really scared, but no doubt the impartial police force will look after them.

Are you saying that everyone who marches is a Hamas supporter simply by marching?

Just to be clear

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
silvertop Flag Portishead 10 Nov 23 2.52pm Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

That's odd considering the number of senior politicians over the years who have publicly criticised the Police.

While Home Sec?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
silvertop Flag Portishead 10 Nov 23 2.55pm Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by eagleman13

Im not a supporter of either main party's & i thought it was the Home Secretary who had the power to ban marches, Stand to be corrected by all of you that think you know better'

[Link]

The decision rests with the police and then the Home Sec if the police refer it to her.

In this case, the police were able to decide based on intelligence and the law. She has the ars8hole as the Met didn't give her the final say. And she saw a chance to score self-serving points.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 10 Nov 23 3.08pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

While Home Sec?

Didn't Labour have a home secretary who famously called the border agency 'not fit for purpose'.

If the sodding home secretary can't criticise failing public institutions which a large part of the population have little faith in then who can.

Maybe she should just keep the charade up so the left can feel ok about their lefty Police service......because a lot of people on the right are not at all happy with the Met.

Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Nov 2023 3.08pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 10 Nov 23 3.14pm Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

The allegations of children being raped has been dropped by the Israeli government.

The 40 beheaded babies claim has been downscaled to one dead baby, not beheaded, and killed by persons unknown.

the Israeli military acknowledge responsibility for some of their own civilian deaths on 7th October.


There are now well in excess of 10,000 civilian dead in Palestine, and the Israeli's themselves estimate less than 100 Hamas operatives among this number.

Children are dying at a rate of 180 per day in Palestine.

Enough is enough.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 68 of 233 < 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Gaza Strip 'invades' Israel.