This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
jeeagles 08 Jun 20 8.45am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
Put it in a museum, where history is documented and for people to learn. A statue suggests they have done something good and should be commemorated. That is what a lot of people suggested. You'd have to find a Museum that's willing to take it due to its historical implications and security issues. You're right, a statue does suggest he did something good... and he did, although the reasons for doing it are debatable. We are talking about a time when the United Kingdon didn't exist. It was 100 years before the USA existed. Ireland was being conquered by Cromwell who committed atrocities theire in the name of religion, but he also brought a constitutional monarchy. You don't see people pulling down his statue, probably because outside Ireland people aren't properly educated about him (even in Ireland its distorted). He also developed a constitutional monarcy, the first nation in the world to have one, 100 years before anywhere else in Europe, and possible a precurser to the democracy we have today. I think it's more important to tell the whole story of how we got to where we are today, rather than just block out the bits we don't like. Pulling it down just reinforces the position that AntiFA are intollerant of anyone who objects to their narrative. I think all the looting and fighting police, what people are trying to achieve has been lost.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 08 Jun 20 8.45am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
The man had the balls to do what the cowards running the Police don't. f*** these people. He probably got arrested for inciting
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 08 Jun 20 8.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jeeagles
That is what a lot of people suggested. You'd have to find a Museum that's willing to take it due to its historical implications and security issues. You're right, a statue does suggest he did something good... and he did, although the reasons for doing it are debatable. We are talking about a time when the United Kingdon didn't exist. It was 100 years before the USA existed. Ireland was being conquered by Cromwell who committed atrocities theire in the name of religion, but he also brought a constitutional monarchy. You don't see people pulling down his statue, probably because outside Ireland people aren't properly educated about him (even in Ireland its distorted). He also developed a constitutional monarcy, the first nation in the world to have one, 100 years before anywhere else in Europe, and possible a precurser to the democracy we have today. I think it's more important to tell the whole story of how we got to where we are today, rather than just block out the bits we don't like. Pulling it down just reinforces the position that AntiFA are intollerant of anyone who objects to their narrative. I think all the looting and fighting police, what people are trying to achieve has been lost. Is very poignant. If they were at all serious about achieveing anything they cannot possibly think their current actions are going to reach the desired outcome. If anything, they've actually very probably further cemented any ill feeling in many peoples heads. My take away from everything yesterday is 'Black People b!tching and moaning about racism in the UK have decided to attack and `vandalise a statue dedicated to the man who Brits voted as Greatest Briton of all time'. What genius.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 08 Jun 20 8.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
So slavery was OK because it was legal at the time? Sure you want to stick your neck out on that one? No it wasn’t but it was accepted practice at the time. Don’t forget slaves were initially enslaved by black slave traders. Have you ever got on your high horse about young white kids being sent up chimneys or white women having endure workhouses? Not acceptable today but no protests. We cannot be held responsible for events that happened a century or more ago. Where does it stop
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 08 Jun 20 9.02am | |
---|---|
Wonder if DanH has any clothes made in Bangladesh? Edited by Spiderman (08 Jun 2020 9.05am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyboy1978 08 Jun 20 9.20am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
It’s not hiding it by not having a statue of a slave owner there any longer. History belongs in museums. Statues are supposed to commemorate good. Many people want the statue many don't. Who gives them the right to choose that it comes down?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 08 Jun 20 9.20am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
Is very poignant. If they were at all serious about achieveing anything they cannot possibly think their current actions are going to reach the desired outcome. If anything, they've actually very probably further cemented any ill feeling in many peoples heads. My take away from everything yesterday is 'Black People b!tching and moaning about racism in the UK have decided to attack and `vandalise a statue dedicated to the man who Brits voted as Greatest Briton of all time'. What genius. I didn’t think the London rioting was going to be a good image for young black people at the start and it still isn’t. Government no doubt knew this is likely. At some point the batons will have to come out so the ill feeling will mean the media can’t brainwash everyone the government or police are institutionally racist. Again, something I keep hearing is in Britain today because of a few incidents of racist words or actions from individual cops. The police are not institutionally racist today. Just like ‘oppression’ and ‘white privilege’, another false and exaggerated term for today.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 08 Jun 20 9.29am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
There is a rational reason to tear down the statue celebrating someone who benefited massively from slavery and death. They had been trying for a number of years to have it removed. I heard about this years ago. Actually I forgot about it and thought it had been removed. If you ask most people, they wouldn’t give a s*** about it. I e heard people from Bristol against the rioting but not concerned the statue has gone. If anything it holds the city back. Again, the suggestion was a museum of slavery. 300 years ago and real oppression, not the so called oppression I’m hearing daily today, was real torture was awful then and awful now. I’ve never watched any documentaries or historical dramas on slavery and just thought it was legitimate then so that’s that. Keeping that statue up is like a ‘fvck you it’s staying and you’re going to see it everyday’ to black people. The stance of maintaining it should stay goes beyond principles of law and all that and starts to show prejudice. It’s the sort of thing I’d expect in Mississippi in the ‘60s. Even if you had a dislike or whatever of black people it’s not a great position to take to stand firm and say they must put up with the statue whatever and lump it. In general there’s going to have to be some compromises and meeting in the middle and standing firm on a slave trader’s statue isn’t the best start. That said the batons should’ve come out at Churchill’s statue but the mistake was made not doing that when the police were attacked on Saturday. That developed probably because they sense the weakness from bending the knee and generally being pussies and not true police. Well I knew that anyway. Standing in chip shop queues I could probably take a few of them without batons. No wonder they’re getting humiliated. I'm sorry, but this man who died 300 years ago has no bearing on anyone living today. No one has the right to damage public property because of some lame brained notion of political correctness.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
mezzer Main Stand, Block F, Row 20 seat 1... 08 Jun 20 9.33am | |
---|---|
The thing that got to me over the weekend was that it coincided with the Anniversary of the D Day landings, the commemorations of which had to be postponed because of the current rules. Because these commemorations were going to be attended by an ever-dwindling number of people that were actually there, and who lived through the war, it suggests to me that this is more recent history than the slavery era. Yet, the Cenotaph and the statue of Churchill were attacked and defaced when they are monuments to more relevant recent history that gave us all the privilege of being able to live as we do today. That was truly standing up to white supremacy, and all of us, black, white, straight, gay, male or female should thank our Gods (or lucky stars if you prefer) that we did. The very fact that we won allows us to protest against things that we don't like, and there is so much today and in recent years that is wrong, but a sense of perspective needs to be retained before either side of the argument froths at the other. We should all retain the same dignity that the survivors of that more recent terrible age display.
Living down here does have some advantages. At least you can see them cry. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 08 Jun 20 9.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
So slavery was OK because it was legal at the time? Sure you want to stick your neck out on that one? Are you 12 years old? What was OK is not the issue. Can you imagine what would happen if everyone who had an ancestral relative who suffered historical mistreatment decided to take it out on related inanimate objects today? Stop defending stupidity. It is not a good look.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 08 Jun 20 9.43am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by mezzer
The thing that got to me over the weekend was that it coincided with the Anniversary of the D Day landings, the commemorations of which had to be postponed because of the current rules. Because these commemorations were going to be attended by an ever-dwindling number of people that were actually there, and who lived through the war, it suggests to me that this is more recent history than the slavery era. Yet, the Cenotaph and the statue of Churchill were attacked and defaced when they are monuments to more relevant recent history that gave us all the privilege of being able to live as we do today. That was truly standing up to white supremacy, and all of us, black, white, straight, gay, male or female should thank our Gods (or lucky stars if you prefer) that we did. The very fact that we won allows us to protest against things that we don't like, and there is so much today and in recent years that is wrong, but a sense of perspective needs to be retained before either side of the argument froths at the other. We should all retain the same dignity that the survivors of that more recent terrible age display. Absolutely.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 08 Jun 20 10.02am | |
---|---|
Hrolf, I think you might benefit in repenting by washing some feet. Attachment: 423CC8E6-40BC-4701-B71F-60DFF7C2616E.jpeg (513.84Kb)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.