This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Coronavirus (LOCKED)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 cryrst  The garden of England 31 Oct 20 12.09pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
I can see you’ll go for the worst case the government and media tell you. What when it’s proven to be bullsh1t? Remember this prediction, I mean ‘scenario’?..... How can you not want HMG to look at the worst and hope for the best. The only way to prove bull s*** is to let it roll but re my earlier post about that. Fundimentally the job of HMG is to protect the life of their people in all capacities. That is what is being done. If there is a different reason that we have a government then im interested and if so your way must be the way to go.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| BlueJay UK 31 Oct 20 12.24pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
If people want to go round confronting strangers then that’s up to them. Most people know not to do that. Lack of concern has nothing to do with it, but you persistently ignore that. Your complete lack of concern was well apparent. I have much respect for NHS workers. They're on the front line and know well the consequences of this virus, hence his actions. You evoked parallels to ideas of 'snitches' and what you'd do if someone confronted you about mask wearing in a discussion about a man who on another day could've been beaten to death rather than 'only' having a shattered eye socket. You repeatedly criticsed his actions and character multiple times before saying 'anything' at all negative about his attackers. You cemented it with ideas that people should know what theyre going to get if they 'play prefect'. I don't care for your reimaginging of reality. Tack on your attitudes and perpetual stamp of approval to oddballs going around confronting testing centre staff and it is, and will remain pitiful behaviour and lack of concern was central to it. It is what it is. Edited by BlueJay (31 Oct 2020 12.29pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| BlueJay UK 31 Oct 20 12.26pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
I can see you’ll go for the worst case the government and media tell you. What when it’s proven to be bullsh1t? Remember this prediction, I mean ‘scenario’?..... What about this representation are you saying means that any specific one of these predictions is 'bulls***'? And out of curiosity, how many actual cases of covid do you personally think there are each day?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Rudi Hedman  Caterham 31 Oct 20 12.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by BlueJay
What about this representation are you saying means that any specific one of these predictions is 'bulls***'? And out of curiosity, how many actual cases of covid do you personally think there are each day? Not 50,000 or 100,000. 24,000 reported. Start from there and work down.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 31 Oct 20 12.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Your complete lack of concern was well apparent. I have much respect for NHS workers. They're on the front line and know well the consequences of this virus, hence his actions. You evoked parallels to ideas of 'snitches' and what you'd do if someone confronted you about mask wearing in a discussion about a man who on another day could've been beaten to death rather than 'only' having a shattered eye socket. You repeatedly criticsed his actions and character multiple times before saying 'anything' at all negative about his attackers. You cemented it with ideas that people should know what theyre going to get if they 'play prefect'. I don't care for your reimaginging of reality. Tack on your attitudes and perpetual stamp of approval to oddballs going around confronting testing centre staff and it is, and will remain pitiful behaviour and lack of concern was central to it. It is what it is. Edited by BlueJay (31 Oct 2020 12.29pm) I respect NHS people too. I’m not reading the rest of this tw&ttish twoddle. Go out and enforce the law everywhere. Go on.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| steeleye20 Croydon 31 Oct 20 12.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Just bullying a fearful population is all the government or opposition seems capable of. What actual changes to our lives do they propose that we can live better and safer lives in balance with nature and the planet. Clean up our act? It is not even a consideration.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 31 Oct 20 12.37pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
How can you not want HMG to look at the worst and hope for the best. The only way to prove bull s*** is to let it roll but re my earlier post about that. Fundimentally the job of HMG is to protect the life of their people in all capacities. That is what is being done. If there is a different reason that we have a government then im interested and if so your way must be the way to go. They’re again calling it a scenario. You fall for it every single time. Out by miles every time, use Neil Ferguson every time. Up to you to believe this rubbish.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| BlueJay UK 31 Oct 20 12.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Not 50,000 or 100,000. 24,000 reported. Start from there and work down. Well then you've misunderstood what the chart is showing. The estimate and the number of daily diagnosed cases are of course two different things. Once again, it's interesting that you're eager to believe that the number could well be below the number of confirmed daily cases, but are so stuck in your one dimensional view that you dedicate precisely no thought or time to considering why the number may well be above diagnosed case numbers. No, that's 'bollocks' apparently.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Jimenez  SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 31 Oct 20 12.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
If the first lock down(supposedly)didn't work? What makes anyone think a second,third, fourth, fifth one will?
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 31 Oct 20 12.50pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Well then you've misunderstood what the chart is showing. The estimate and the number of daily diagnosed cases are of course two different things. Once again, it's interesting that you're eager to believe that the number could well be below the number of confirmed daily cases, but are so stuck in your one dimensional view that you dedicate precisely no thought or time to considering why the number may well be above diagnosed case numbers. No, that's 'bollocks' apparently. You clearly are a government bot. The estimate (scenario do they could dodge scrutiny) was wildly out, again, like spring, again, like this will be, again. Again and again and again.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| cryrst The garden of England 31 Oct 20 12.52pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
They’re again calling it a scenario. You fall for it every single time. Out by miles every time, use Neil Ferguson every time. Up to you to believe this rubbish. Not really an answer or even an opinion to what I wrote. Never mind.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 31 Oct 20 12.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Not really an answer or even an opinion to what I wrote. Never mind. This will do (using neil fvcking Ferguson again. He’s not even a biologist, let alone epidemiologist etc. SAGE are supposed to have those and have ignored their horizontal flat line only 2 days ago. It’s verging on hilarious how they chop and change on a daily basis to get people’s brains spinning out of control).... The estimate (scenario do they could dodge scrutiny) was wildly out, again, like spring, again, like this will be, again. Again and again and again.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.