The skewed logic is in thinking anyone would think a family showering together after swimming was worth recording let alone it having any effect on her years after the event.
Still. Carry on spinning.

The tactics he uses of the 'facts' not being known when they clearly are, are the same that he uses to excuse the blind eye turned by the police to paedophile gangs among certain 'communities' in northern towns.

However, when it comes to the likes of whether people were silently praying or the motives of bakers turning down business, or indeed absolutely anyone that he disapproves of doing anything remotely amiss, then he would win an olympic gold medal in jumping to conclusions.

His other tactic is to simply deny that a reprehensible action by someone he approves of simply did not happen and was made up. Longer standing posters on here may recall his absurd stance of the statue of John Chilembwe erected on the fourth plinth in Trafalgar Square. Chilembwe was a preacher in Africa who organised the murder of a white farm manager and others and preached a sermon with the severed head of the manager impaled on a pole next to him. When I and others questioned the suitability of such a person being on the fourth plinth, his defence of it was that the events did not happen and were merely imperial propaganda. This despite there being a trial and testimonies from the manager’s widow who witnessed the beheading with her children.
If he were to tell you that today is Wednesday, 5th June 2024, I recommend that you check a calendar.

All a republican smear campaign. He is just a troubled soul who needs a cuddle or maybe a family shower

He does, although bringing a case on this basis rather than dealing with it outside the court system has a nasty smell of political revenge hanging over it.

We will see what the jury says. If found guilty what the punishment ordered by the Judge will be is just as interesting, given the circumstances of his addiction.

Edited by Wisbech Eagle (05 Jun 2024 8.56am)

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

She did, but she also said that the interpretations being made were false.

So why would she say that? She could have thought they were probably not appropriate because they might create the kind of impression that they have. So then had to say they were false when they did.

You can have whatever suspicions your instincts allow. For political opponents of Joe Biden to spread them as they have is pure political smearing. You cannot defend that.

I prefer not to judge without evidence.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

But but but you keep telling us that the US justice system isn't political?

What was political was the DA's sweetheart deal thrown out by a judge. Not only was Biden just given a slap on the wrist for the serious crimes he was charged with he was also given a pardon for any crimes he had not been charged with, quite incredible.

The only times that these type of deals are given out is when a defendant agrees to co-operate and give up a bigger fish. Biden's deal did not include any requirement for that which is why the judge threw it out.

You talk about help and yet he was already in Rehab, sympathy for criminal behaviour can only go so far. His girlfriend was sufficiently worried about his mental health to throw the gun away.

Drug related gun crime is a serious issue in the US many many murders / shootings are related to people who are high on drugs hence this law. If Biden was poor and black there would have been no sweetheart deal and no public interest and he would get serious jail time.

Not many people run for President so it is hard to judge Trump's crimes against similar cases because there aren't many. However Biden is charged with common crimes that happen every day in the US so if he is found guilty there is a benchmark for his punishment.

We will see.

Edited by Badger11 (05 Jun 2024 9.15am)

One more point