This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 24 Nov 21 7.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
You must be insane. I suggest you read the report that Teddy referenced. It's all in there. The BBC are reacting to the revelations that Rafiq made, which were then followed up by a response to a question one of their journalists asked. Their decision is editorial. It is not judgemental.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 24 Nov 21 7.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
They have made the editorial decision not to have him in the TMS team for the Ashes and to remove him, for the time being, from the firing line whilst this story is current, as it would be awkward for him. I would expect he is still being paid. It's not an unusual situation these days. I hope, and expect, it will blow over. Nothing can be verified and, hopefully, it is just a genuine case of people misremembering, or completely forgetting, events which others remember differently.
Already he claims that he has 6 players who were present who support him. I would not expect him to publicly name then but he should be allowed to put up or shut up to the BBC in an internal inquiry. Edited by Badger11 (24 Nov 2021 7.45pm)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 24 Nov 21 8.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dreamwaverider
Originally posted by BlueJay
That omits the context of the words. Calling someone a Brit has no real negative connotations, whereas P**i is more routinely used as a racial insult (hence why HOL censors it), so that they're both four letter abbreviations or are not incorrect in conveying another meaning still strips what is often the meaning and reason for saying these specific words, especially nowadays. If someones child had learning difficulties and you call them a 'retard' in certain circumstances it might technically be the right term to use, but in a societal context expect the parent to be grossly offended. If someone calls a man's wife a 'bitch' in front of him , fine she's female so again he's correct in a sense, but expect any man worth his salt to quickly correct the language used (unless his other half is indeed a bitch ). Still, nothing is out of bounds really in the right setting. I'm just addressing your point regarding why words can often fairly be taken in very different ways.
I can tell you right now Blue Jay that I am hugely offended by you referring to me and my fellow countrymen as B**ts and I would like you to withdraw this offensive word with a full apology to all B**ta. I made a clear, reasonable and indeed jokey point about why context in referring to someone as a 'brit' or a 'p**i' may factor in. Giving other examples of it. You have no point to make other than playing to an audience. I wasn't saying anything that was particularly controversial and have only bothered to reply as a courtesy since you decided to address me weeks after I posted. If it's alright with you I'll not bother to engage in this section of the site in future, as I stated the other day. It's largely a waste of time, ever evidenced as such. Edited by BlueJay (24 Nov 2021 8.04pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 24 Nov 21 8.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
I made a clear, reasonable and indeed jokey point about why context in referring to someone as a 'brit' or a 'p**i' may factor in. Giving other examples of it. You have no point to make other than playing to an audience. I wasn't saying anything that was particularly controversial and have only bothered to reply as a courtesy since you decided to address me weeks after I posted. If it's alright with you I'll not bother to engage in this section of the site in future, as I stated the other day. It's largely a waste of time, ever evidenced as such. Edited by BlueJay (24 Nov 2021 8.04pm) That is hilarious coming from you. You keep saying you won't post on the political threads any more, but you keep coming back. Don't waste time responding with your usual slurs because you won't get a reply.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Grumbles 24 Nov 21 8.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
That is hilarious coming from you. You keep saying you won't post on the political threads any more, but you keep coming back. Don't waste time responding with your usual slurs because you won't get a reply. Observation across many posters on many forum......I bet he will.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 24 Nov 21 9.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
That is hilarious coming from you. You keep saying you won't post on the political threads any more, but you keep coming back. Don't waste time responding with your usual slurs because you won't get a reply. I was quickly following up on a reply to me. Thanks for your insistence that you won't be replying back. As you're not part of the exchange to begin with, that's no trouble at all. I wish you well.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 24 Nov 21 9.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
I was quickly following up on a reply to me. Thanks for your insistence that you won't be replying back. As you're not part of the exchange to begin with, that's no trouble at all. I wish you well. He said a week or two ago he wasn't going to reply to me any more. It didn't last long, so if you change your mind you will be in good company. Or bad, depending on how you view things.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 24 Nov 21 10.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
He said a week or two ago he wasn't going to reply to me any more. It didn't last long, so if you change your mind you will be in good company. Or bad, depending on how you view things. Actually, I said that I wasn't replying to you, which is different. There was no commitment going forward. I reserve the right to reverse that position when it amuses me.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 24 Nov 21 11.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Grumbles
Observation across many posters on many forum......I bet he will. This would be a comical post to sign off on.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 25 Nov 21 12.00pm | |
---|---|
The BBC decision on Vaughan was entirely predictable - guilty until proved innocent nowadays.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dubai Eagle 25 Nov 21 12.12pm | |
---|---|
I see Sky News is now running a story that 2 ex players are claiming that Cricket Scotland is institutionally racist based on these players speaking out & then not being selected to play for Scotland again
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 25 Nov 21 12.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Dubai Eagle
I see Sky News is now running a story that 2 ex players are claiming that Cricket Scotland is institutionally racist based on these players speaking out & then not being selected to play for Scotland again They forced them to eat Haggis.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.