As far as I'm aware Miles Taylor was a department Chief of Staff, not the actual Chief of Staff to Trump.

He was dishonest and hid his identity while writing an article stating that he was working against Trump from within.

Thus this dishonesty debars him from trust he had a book to sell.

However, as stated, while criticism of how Trump talked about his daughter....who has a very good relationship with him...can be criticized as inappropriate there is no suggestion that anything untoward physically happened.

The same cannot be said for Biden.....naked showers with a 13 year old daughter..

The proof is there in black and white ink from the daughter herself...'hyper-sexualized at a young age', her words of her childhood....she needed years of therapy....people should look at Hunter Biden's photos to see what influence Biden has had as a father and then compare that to Trump's children.

We have seen Biden sniffing the hair of young girls. As vice president there is video of him...I would say talking inappropriately to the children of white house visitors about dating and boyfriends and touching durin that saw several of them pull away from him.

Edited by Stirlingsays (02 Jun 2024 9.17pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Attempting to discredit anyone writing about Trump from personal experience is quite funny to witness. When Trump discredits himself all the time all anyone else can do is add context. The Chief of Staff was John Kelly who is said to have admonished Trump over these particular remarks. To repeat, so far as I am aware Taylor has not been sued for libel, either by Trump or Kelly, so it’s reasonable to assume the quote is accurate.

It’s already been acknowledged that there is no suggestion of inappropriate behaviour by Trump in this matter. Which is in stark contrast to the way some treat Biden. What is suggested is that the way Trump talks about his daughter is inappropriate and that this indicates an underlying dubious attitude towards women.

Once again we have unverified assertions being made. Where is the evidence? Why assume they were both naked? She was apparently 11 at the time she said it happened, not 13. The diary is not contemporaneous. It was written much later as part of an attempt to overcome her psychosis. What caused that psychosis is unknown and assuming it was something her father did does not bear examination. It might not have happened at all. It could all be entirely the imagined musings of a troubled mind.

We just don’t know. All we do know is that the diary exists, was written by her and was stolen from her to be exploited.

There is though another fact. This is a direct quote from Ashley Biden:-

“Repeatedly, I hear others grossly misinterpret my once-private writings and lob false accusations that defame my character and those of the people I love.”

Perhaps people will take her word that things were not as some are suggesting they were.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Of course it’s only potential at the moment. He is just a citizen and a candidate right now. It’s if he succeeds that the potential becomes real.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

She was 13. But what difference does it make. She could have been 17 or 27. Move on. Nothing to see here.

Putin is not head of a western country.

No they’re not. They verified the fact that the diary was genuine.

That’s all though. They could not possibly verify that the contents were accurate or the interpretation being put on them was. That’s the sole prerogative of the author and I have posted her comments.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.