You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Coutts VS Nigel Farage
November 22 2024 8.50am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Coutts VS Nigel Farage

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 63 of 80 < 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 >

  

HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 03 Aug 23 11.25pm Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

Originally posted by palace99

and that is the crux of this non story. Hopefully this thread can be closed ASAP.

So the resignation of two CEO's in major banks due to debanking someone based on legally held views, and then the bank u turns, is a non story?

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 03 Aug 23 11.46pm Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

Any allegation, no matter how baseless, should be treated as unproven rather than fake. In other words, the lie can be referred to as a factual allegation until it is disproved.

Is this a reasonable view?

The onus being 100% on the accused to prove the allegation wrong.

This is directly related to this thread.

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 04 Aug 23 7.47am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

[Link]

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Spiderman Flag Horsham 04 Aug 23 8.17am Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Don’t hold your breath. Wait to see who will be heading any enquiry

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 04 Aug 23 8.20am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

Don’t hold your breath. Wait to see who will be heading any enquiry

Wissie, which means an open and shut case for the banks

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 04 Aug 23 9.34am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Not really. It's legal to give alcohol to a 5 year old but that doesn't mean you should do it.

Arguing for change is lawful. No one says it isn’t or you shouldn’t do it.

Until then what is, is what ii is for all.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 04 Aug 23 9.41am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Wissie, which means an open and shut case for the banks

Let’s see what is actually revealed, why it’s being done and what proposals, if any, are made.

Don’t hold your breath. I wouldn’t put a lot of money on Farage’s claims being accurate.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 04 Aug 23 9.59am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Let’s see what is actually revealed, why it’s being done and what proposals, if any, are made.

Don’t hold your breath. I wouldn’t put a lot of money on Farage’s claims being accurate.

Just one needs to be true though !

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 04 Aug 23 10.10am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by HKOwen

Any allegation, no matter how baseless, should be treated as unproven rather than fake. In other words, the lie can be referred to as a factual allegation until it is disproved.

Is this a reasonable view?

The onus being 100% on the accused to prove the allegation wrong.

This is directly related to this thread.

That’s the kind of argument a conspiracy theorist relies on.

Things can only be proved in a court of law and then only to the “beyond a reasonable doubt “ standard, thus always leaving room for personal doubt or new evidence. That proof has to be produced by the accuser not the accused, who is innocent until proven guilty. It’s never the task of the accused to prove their innocence. Which enables many who are undoubtedly rogues to get away with things.

So is it reasonable? Not in every day life. In a court, yes, but with the burden of proof reversed.

As this is not a court, it cannot be in this thread. All there will ever be are opinions.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 04 Aug 23 12.35pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Arguing for change is lawful. No one says it isn’t or you shouldn’t do it.

Until then what is, is what ii is for all.

Being lawful doesn't mean it's morally or ethically acceptable.

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 04 Aug 23 12.44pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Being lawful doesn't mean it's morally or ethically acceptable.

[Link]

What's ethically and morally acceptable can be a matter of opinion. The only way to resolve differences of opinion is via the law.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 04 Aug 23 12.50pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

What's ethically and morally acceptable can be a matter of opinion. The only way to resolve differences of opinion is via the law.

Which is what Farage has done. He challenged the bank and they offered to reinstate his account.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 63 of 80 < 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Coutts VS Nigel Farage