You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
November 24 2024 3.02pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

ukip (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 63 of 311 < 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 >

Topic Locked

legaleagle Flag 18 May 14 9.12pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 8.33pm

Leaving aside the massive Bulkan Wars for now, just because there have been no major wars in the rest of Europe, why is that necessarily because of the existence of the EU?


Precisely my point re the Balkan wars (which were in central rather than W Europe)....the EU has contributed to making it unthinkable former nationalist rivals such as France, Germany, and the UK (and Germany v Poland) would go to war every generation or so..since, not least, rather than thinking of each other as eternal enemies, we would come to think of each other as all part of something together and iron out differences through dialogue, compromise and education,...the same applies to a repeat of the Balkan wars as more former Yugoslav states join the EU..

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
SloveniaDave Flag Tirana, Albania 18 May 14 9.15pm Send a Private Message to SloveniaDave Add SloveniaDave as a friend

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 8.33pm

Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 7.57pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 18 May 2014 1.37pm

Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 12.09pm

Being "anti-EU" has come to encapsulate a code for being disatisfied with life and seeking a convenient "other" to blame it on....Hence, UKIP's mass appeal....as a protest vote.

Maybe its the EU's fault our taxi drivers don't wear uniforms as per UKIP's manifesto at the last elections?!

Blaming all woes on the EU very neatly incorporates many of the "others" people have sought to blame their/"our" woes on over the past few decades: economic decline post empire, loss of Empire, immigration, multi-culturalism.

The EU is very far from perfect (what is?) but, I suspect we need it more than vice versa and if people think leaving would lead to anything other than economic disaster, I fear they are living in dreamland...The figures recently published about how many from Romania and Bulgaria actually chose to come here post 1 January 2014 says it all about the gap between reality and the culture of blaming/fear of the outsider "other" we inhabit.

Go to former Yugoslavia, for example, and you get a stark view of the very real benefits to all (including us) of the EU existing.

Will be interesting to see re next year's general election, if UKIP can sustain their place as a receptacle of the general protest vote...ie all we need for everything in the UK to be hunky dory is no more immigrants and get out of the EU.


This post incorporates not only a caricature of your perception of a Ukip voter and their motivations but for good measure you produce the rather obvious statement that poor countries that get a standard of living boost tend to like the EU.

Errr....Wow, how surprising.

There are only three net contributors to the EU of which we are one....I'm not bleeding surprised poor countries are chuffed.

Your caricature of a Ukip voter is simplistic and certainly doesn't speak for me. I most certainly don't blame the EU for everything but they do share blame for the financial crises (creation of a system that couldn't live with a financial shock).....But on that score they are just typical of politicians everywhere.

The overreach and mistakes the EU makes are really another thread so I won't list them here.

Officially Ukip spoke of projected figures that were possible and still are...The legal agreement Labour signed means any EU citizen can live here (I oppose this...There should be a cap)..The fact that you have gone with....once again with caricaturing what they meant actually shows your willingness to replace reality with half truths.

When I referred to former Yugoslavia, I was actually getting at the benefits of the rule of law and the reduction of nationalism...Its quite a good thing there have been no major wars in W Europe for 70 years or so, isn't it?There, many see EU "restrictions" and "diktats" as something positive, ie health and safety protections, data protection laws,judicial reforms, and at least some banking regulation.Sorry if that interfers too much with the stereotype of "Johnny Foreigner" only seeking monetary gain as soon as we are not looking...

When we speak of "net contributors", lets not overlook the massive contribution to our economy of tariff free access within the EU area. Plus having a bit more clout in world affairs as a part of the EU (ie in trade negotiations with the USA) than alone...

Our financial crisis was in large part due to Maggie and co's deregulation of the financial sector in the 1980's..as a result, and because of having the City as a major world financial centre, we'd have been exposed regardless of the EU...so another example of something blamed on the EU..

Why is immigration seen as such an explanatory factor for all our woes (and consistently has been in some quarters for 100 years)?Shall we call for the repatriation of all the hundreds of thousands of Brits happily now living in EU countries, or is that different because, to paraphrase Mr Farage, they like Germans are ok neighbours whereas Romanians are not...


I accept it may well be you are not the archetypal UKIP voter I admittedly caricatured.

Leaving aside the massive Bulkan Wars for now, just because there have been no major wars in the rest of Europe, why is that necessarily because of the existence of the EU?


Because that was the primary reason behind the creation of the EU...to tie the French and German economies together so that war would be much less likely because of the inter-dependence it would establish. And to that end it has been an enormous success.

 


Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!

My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.

(Member of the School of Optimism 1969-2016 inclusive)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
kangel Flag 18 May 14 9.21pm

Quote SloveniaDave at 18 May 2014 8.57pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 8.45pm

Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 2.10pm)

I'm all for successful British businesses, we should do all we can to allow them to flourish, ie, minimum of government as possible.


like letting them invest where they want, sell where they want and employ who they want? I agree.

Absolutely - and free of all the EU controls and micro 'management'.


what controls exactly did you mean? Health and safety? or the 'controls' which actually allow us to sell throughout the EU without restriction? You haven't read the book yet, have you?


_____________________________________________________
If we produce goods that people want to buy at a price that they are willing to pay, then we will trade.

Edited by kangel (18 May 2014 8.45pm)


Only in your dreams. Countries use tariff barriers to protect their own economies and always have. That means that we cannot compete if a country or trading bloc (i.e. the EU) places tariffs on our goods.

That is why the current GATT negotiations have been running for over 20 years without resolution and our ability to export to the US and other countries is severely restricted in a whole range of goods.

You are living in a fantasy world if you think we can just carry on trading with zero tariffs without accepting what goes with it.

It is perfectly possible to construct a reasonable argument for us to leave the EU but you do need some basic degree of understanding of the issues in order to do it. Unfortunately you are not demonstrating that capacity.

We managed fine before we were in the EU when, as you say, tariffs existed.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
kangel Flag 18 May 14 9.22pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 9.21pm

Quote SloveniaDave at 18 May 2014 8.57pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 8.45pm

Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 2.10pm)

I'm all for successful British businesses, we should do all we can to allow them to flourish, ie, minimum of government as possible.


like letting them invest where they want, sell where they want and employ who they want? I agree.

Absolutely - and free of all the EU controls and micro 'management'.


what controls exactly did you mean? Health and safety? or the 'controls' which actually allow us to sell throughout the EU without restriction? You haven't read the book yet, have you?


_____________________________________________________
If we produce goods that people want to buy at a price that they are willing to pay, then we will trade.

Edited by kangel (18 May 2014 8.45pm)


Only in your dreams. Countries use tariff barriers to protect their own economies and always have. That means that we cannot compete if a country or trading bloc (i.e. the EU) places tariffs on our goods.

That is why the current GATT negotiations have been running for over 20 years without resolution and our ability to export to the US and other countries is severely restricted in a whole range of goods.

You are living in a fantasy world if you think we can just carry on trading with zero tariffs without accepting what goes with it.

It is perfectly possible to construct a reasonable argument for us to leave the EU but you do need some basic degree of understanding of the issues in order to do it. Unfortunately you are not demonstrating that capacity.


______________________________________________

We managed fine before we were in the EU when, as you say, tariffs existed.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
SloveniaDave Flag Tirana, Albania 18 May 14 9.24pm Send a Private Message to SloveniaDave Add SloveniaDave as a friend

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 9.21pm

Quote SloveniaDave at 18 May 2014 8.57pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 8.45pm

Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 2.10pm)

I'm all for successful British businesses, we should do all we can to allow them to flourish, ie, minimum of government as possible.


like letting them invest where they want, sell where they want and employ who they want? I agree.

Absolutely - and free of all the EU controls and micro 'management'.


what controls exactly did you mean? Health and safety? or the 'controls' which actually allow us to sell throughout the EU without restriction? You haven't read the book yet, have you?


_____________________________________________________
If we produce goods that people want to buy at a price that they are willing to pay, then we will trade.

Edited by kangel (18 May 2014 8.45pm)


Only in your dreams. Countries use tariff barriers to protect their own economies and always have. That means that we cannot compete if a country or trading bloc (i.e. the EU) places tariffs on our goods.

That is why the current GATT negotiations have been running for over 20 years without resolution and our ability to export to the US and other countries is severely restricted in a whole range of goods.

You are living in a fantasy world if you think we can just carry on trading with zero tariffs without accepting what goes with it.

It is perfectly possible to construct a reasonable argument for us to leave the EU but you do need some basic degree of understanding of the issues in order to do it. Unfortunately you are not demonstrating that capacity.

We managed fine before we were in the EU when, as you say, tariffs existed.


We did, for a couple of hundred years, but that was because we had an Empire to trade with and we set the tariffs.

You may not have noticed, but we no longer have an Empire.

 


Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!

My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.

(Member of the School of Optimism 1969-2016 inclusive)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
reborn 18 May 14 9.25pm Send a Private Message to reborn Add reborn as a friend

So...we all agree UKIP are mean and bonkers right?

 


My username has nothing to do with my religious beliefs

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
kangel Flag 18 May 14 9.31pm

Quote SloveniaDave at 18 May 2014 9.24pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 9.21pm

Quote SloveniaDave at 18 May 2014 8.57pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 8.45pm

Edited by nickgusset (18 May 2014 2.10pm)

I'm all for successful British businesses, we should do all we can to allow them to flourish, ie, minimum of government as possible.


like letting them invest where they want, sell where they want and employ who they want? I agree.

Absolutely - and free of all the EU controls and micro 'management'.


what controls exactly did you mean? Health and safety? or the 'controls' which actually allow us to sell throughout the EU without restriction? You haven't read the book yet, have you?


_____________________________________________________
If we produce goods that people want to buy at a price that they are willing to pay, then we will trade.

Edited by kangel (18 May 2014 8.45pm)


Only in your dreams. Countries use tariff barriers to protect their own economies and always have. That means that we cannot compete if a country or trading bloc (i.e. the EU) places tariffs on our goods.

That is why the current GATT negotiations have been running for over 20 years without resolution and our ability to export to the US and other countries is severely restricted in a whole range of goods.

You are living in a fantasy world if you think we can just carry on trading with zero tariffs without accepting what goes with it.

It is perfectly possible to construct a reasonable argument for us to leave the EU but you do need some basic degree of understanding of the issues in order to do it. Unfortunately you are not demonstrating that capacity.

We managed fine before we were in the EU when, as you say, tariffs existed.


We did, for a couple of hundred years, but that was because we had an Empire to trade with and we set the tariffs.

You may not have noticed, but we no longer have an Empire.

____________________________________

So we didn't trade at all before 1975?

Edited by kangel (18 May 2014 9.32pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
SloveniaDave Flag Tirana, Albania 18 May 14 9.45pm Send a Private Message to SloveniaDave Add SloveniaDave as a friend

Kangel, you appear to parade your ignorance as a badge of honour.

If you won't listen to others, at least go away and learn some history and basic economics so that you can form a coherent argument of your own.

You quoted Enoch Powell previously and, even if we don't all agree with much of what he said, he was, undoubtedly, a man of integrity, intelligence and intellectual rigour.

He was very pro-Empire in his younger days but came to see that it was not sustainable after the 2nd World War and he supported much closer links with our European neighbours as the best economic future for the UK.

His argument against the ECC was about the subservient relationship between Brussels and the member states and that is still where the debate lies. We are a part of Europe, always will be, and they will have to be our major trading partners. The question is how do we achieve the balance between economic cooperation and political integrity.

 


Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!

My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.

(Member of the School of Optimism 1969-2016 inclusive)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
kangel Flag 18 May 14 9.53pm

Quote SloveniaDave at 18 May 2014 9.45pm

Kangel, you appear to parade your ignorance as a badge of honour.

If you won't listen to others, at least go away and learn some history and basic economics so that you can form a coherent argument of your own.

You quoted Enoch Powell previously and, even if we don't all agree with much of what he said, he was, undoubtedly, a man of integrity, intelligence and intellectual rigour.

He was very pro-Empire in his younger days but came to see that it was not sustainable after the 2nd World War and he supported much closer links with our European neighbours as the best economic future for the UK.

His argument against the ECC was about the subservient relationship between Brussels and the member states and that is still where the debate lies. We are a part of Europe, always will be, and they will have to be our major trading partners. The question is how do we achieve the balance between economic cooperation and political integrity.

Is that your answer to did we trade before 1975?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
Stirlingsays Flag 18 May 14 10.19pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 9.12pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 8.33pm

Leaving aside the massive Bulkan Wars for now, just because there have been no major wars in the rest of Europe, why is that necessarily because of the existence of the EU?


Precisely my point re the Balkan wars (which were in central rather than W Europe)....the EU has contributed to making it unthinkable former nationalist rivals such as France, Germany, and the UK (and Germany v Poland) would go to war every generation or so..since, not least, rather than thinking of each other as eternal enemies, we would come to think of each other as all part of something together and iron out differences through dialogue, compromise and education,...the same applies to a repeat of the Balkan wars as more former Yugoslav states join the EU..

The actual reality is that you don't and didn't need what we have now as the EU to avoid war in Europe.

Europe needed cooperation and still does....It doesn't need a superstate.

Churchill himself spoke of greater cooperation, achievements were made.....Things like Nato, good positive things. It deterred the USSR and even now Putin factors Nato into his foreign policy.

However, anyone that argues that getting rid of this EU risks another world war is simply being Daily Mail like and talking overblown nonsense.

Globalization and inter-dependence has had an effect in reducing the chances of war.

So has advances in technology and communication.....Also, to put it simply. The massive costs of major war factor in.....But still these aren't anything like the biggest factors.....The single biggest reason is a factor you didn't mention.

It's called nuclear weapons and it ended the last world war.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
SloveniaDave Flag Tirana, Albania 18 May 14 10.25pm Send a Private Message to SloveniaDave Add SloveniaDave as a friend

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 9.53pm

Quote SloveniaDave at 18 May 2014 9.45pm

Kangel, you appear to parade your ignorance as a badge of honour.

If you won't listen to others, at least go away and learn some history and basic economics so that you can form a coherent argument of your own.

You quoted Enoch Powell previously and, even if we don't all agree with much of what he said, he was, undoubtedly, a man of integrity, intelligence and intellectual rigour.

He was very pro-Empire in his younger days but came to see that it was not sustainable after the 2nd World War and he supported much closer links with our European neighbours as the best economic future for the UK.

His argument against the ECC was about the subservient relationship between Brussels and the member states and that is still where the debate lies. We are a part of Europe, always will be, and they will have to be our major trading partners. The question is how do we achieve the balance between economic cooperation and political integrity.



Is that your answer to did we trade before 1975?


Yes. I am not paid to be your teacher.

I have already suggested some background reading for you, but, in hindsight, it was probably a bit advanced.

Can I recommend the Ladybird Book of British History and a very good read called 'Janet and John's Guide to the Principles of Economics and Trade'.

Happy reading

 


Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!

My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.

(Member of the School of Optimism 1969-2016 inclusive)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
kangel Flag 18 May 14 10.29pm

Quote SloveniaDave at 18 May 2014 9.15pm

Quote kangel at 18 May 2014 8.33pm

Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 7.57pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 18 May 2014 1.37pm

Quote legaleagle at 18 May 2014 12.09pm

Being "anti-EU" has come to encapsulate a code for being disatisfied with life and seeking a convenient "other" to blame it on....Hence, UKIP's mass appeal....as a protest vote.

Maybe its the EU's fault our taxi drivers don't wear uniforms as per UKIP's manifesto at the last elections?!

Blaming all woes on the EU very neatly incorporates many of the "others" people have sought to blame their/"our" woes on over the past few decades: economic decline post empire, loss of Empire, immigration, multi-culturalism.

The EU is very far from perfect (what is?) but, I suspect we need it more than vice versa and if people think leaving would lead to anything other than economic disaster, I fear they are living in dreamland...The figures recently published about how many from Romania and Bulgaria actually chose to come here post 1 January 2014 says it all about the gap between reality and the culture of blaming/fear of the outsider "other" we inhabit.

Go to former Yugoslavia, for example, and you get a stark view of the very real benefits to all (including us) of the EU existing.

Will be interesting to see re next year's general election, if UKIP can sustain their place as a receptacle of the general protest vote...ie all we need for everything in the UK to be hunky dory is no more immigrants and get out of the EU.


This post incorporates not only a caricature of your perception of a Ukip voter and their motivations but for good measure you produce the rather obvious statement that poor countries that get a standard of living boost tend to like the EU.

Errr....Wow, how surprising.

There are only three net contributors to the EU of which we are one....I'm not bleeding surprised poor countries are chuffed.

Your caricature of a Ukip voter is simplistic and certainly doesn't speak for me. I most certainly don't blame the EU for everything but they do share blame for the financial crises (creation of a system that couldn't live with a financial shock).....But on that score they are just typical of politicians everywhere.

The overreach and mistakes the EU makes are really another thread so I won't list them here.

Officially Ukip spoke of projected figures that were possible and still are...The legal agreement Labour signed means any EU citizen can live here (I oppose this...There should be a cap)..The fact that you have gone with....once again with caricaturing what they meant actually shows your willingness to replace reality with half truths.

When I referred to former Yugoslavia, I was actually getting at the benefits of the rule of law and the reduction of nationalism...Its quite a good thing there have been no major wars in W Europe for 70 years or so, isn't it?There, many see EU "restrictions" and "diktats" as something positive, ie health and safety protections, data protection laws,judicial reforms, and at least some banking regulation.Sorry if that interfers too much with the stereotype of "Johnny Foreigner" only seeking monetary gain as soon as we are not looking...

When we speak of "net contributors", lets not overlook the massive contribution to our economy of tariff free access within the EU area. Plus having a bit more clout in world affairs as a part of the EU (ie in trade negotiations with the USA) than alone...

Our financial crisis was in large part due to Maggie and co's deregulation of the financial sector in the 1980's..as a result, and because of having the City as a major world financial centre, we'd have been exposed regardless of the EU...so another example of something blamed on the EU..

Why is immigration seen as such an explanatory factor for all our woes (and consistently has been in some quarters for 100 years)?Shall we call for the repatriation of all the hundreds of thousands of Brits happily now living in EU countries, or is that different because, to paraphrase Mr Farage, they like Germans are ok neighbours whereas Romanians are not...


I accept it may well be you are not the archetypal UKIP voter I admittedly caricatured.

Leaving aside the massive Bulkan Wars for now, just because there have been no major wars in the rest of Europe, why is that necessarily because of the existence of the EU?


Because that was the primary reason behind the creation of the EU...to tie the French and German economies together so that war would be much less likely because of the inter-dependence it would establish. And to that end it has been an enormous success.


__________________________________________

If it was "the primary reason" for the EU, why did it just not stop at a France/Germany 'project', I'm sure they would have got along together famously. As the threat of a future war after World War II was with Russia, why didn't we ask Russia to join the EU? In fact why don't we ask all the countries in the entire world to join the EU as apparently it guarantees everlasting peace?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post

Topic Locked

Page 63 of 311 < 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic